It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AGR1PPA
reply to post by Gideon70
Namaste, brudda.
That's what I'm thinking as well, probably just someone viewing the festivities. But the ATS side of me wants it to be something more complicated
Absent being able to identify the caller, could they triangalate after the fact to get a general location from where the detonation call originated?
If it was a disposable phone that might actually narrow the returns
Look for individuals that would match people seen at the impact scene around when they think the bags were dropped?
Originally posted by Cito
Crappy bombs...Ted Kaczynski would be embarrassed at the crappy work. Hiding them in trash cans?
When they explained the bombs, it was crap you got at home, nothing fancy, nothing as eloquent as ol' Ted's handywork, those were a lot fancier, even if he screwed up a couple course those were meant for single targets
This is almost like some kids wanting to prank the marathon setting off 2 trash can "poofs" when runners crossed the finish line.
Notice it was the finish line and 1 block back covering the final leg of the run. I think it was kids thinking it would be fun and cool, they screwed up and hurt people and that was NOT IN THE PLAN.
When they realized their "OH SH!$ moment", he/she or they decided to keep lips sealed and move with the crowd and get out of there and will never speak of it again, and live with the guilty conscience rest of their life/lives.
Originally posted by AGR1PPA
reply to post by Indigo5
Totally agree. And I think you're right on point with the questions about the CCTV cameras. This is a busy street in Boston, and I'm sure all of the shops have at least one camera each, not to mention the media cameras for the race, the municipal cameras on the street, and the bystanders' personal devices.
My biggest concern is that they won't look at the larger body of evidence. In an attack like this, I'm sure the perpetrator did a few "dry runs", just to make sure his timing was right, his sight angles were obscured from the police, his getaway plans were solid, etc.
What they need to do is pore through the past few weeks' security footage on those blocks in Boston. I'm sure they'll find someone suspiciously taking notes, walking in strange directions, and observing the area extensively. It might not be the best video, but it'll help in the investigation.
One or more persons?
Originally posted by neo96
This is their best bet to find the bomber. cameras in the area.
Originally posted by ShadowBase
Why does it always come down to "who", "why" and "how"? When will people start giving "what" some love? What made someone come to believe that such action was necessary?
Originally posted by xXSvenXx
Did a quick google search but couldn't find an answer to my question.
Is it possible to identify certain ingredients in a bomb by studying the explosion?
What would cause a fireball with white smoke?
Or do explosions all look and behave the same? Apart from nukes of course.
Is it possible to identify certain ingredients in a bomb by studying the explosion?
What would cause a fireball with white smoke?
Or do explosions all look and behave the same?
It was reported that the two bombs had been left in trash cans. Such receptacles are normally removed from parade routes and other events as an anti-terror precaution, and law-enforcement sources told The Post it wasn’t clear whether the report indicated a security failing — or if, perhaps, the terrorists had set up their own cans.