It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
This question, or whatever, is nonsensical.
So what do you guys think about the acceptance of failure deal? Should your god be comfortable with risking himself for you? Should he be comfortable with having to suffer for that?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by AfterInfinity
Many, myself included, don't believe that God needs to make an appointment with Dr. Kervorkian to save humanity, there's an easier and more just provision already in place.
I'm suggesting that we may have gone from asking God to do an impossible act to doing an unnecessary act. Is that better for you and your discussion?
Asking God to be ignorant, limited by the laws of physics, do evil, all seem to be impossible under any traditional definition of God.
Why would anything we ask of our Creator be an impossiblity;
charles1952
Dear vethumanbeing,
We may have a definition problem. Why would anything we ask of our Creator be an impossiblity; Asking God to be ignorant, limited by the laws of physics, do evil, all seem to be impossible under any traditional definition of God.
charles1952
I don't believe we are God's "playtoys." We are His children.
If you dreamt your creator into existence, then who created the "you" who is dreaming?
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by vethumanbeing
Yes, I'm pretty sure it's a language problem. I thought you said there is nothing impossible to God. My response was that some things are impossible to God. God can't be stupid, or evil.
An all-powerful god can't be our playtoy which we created. First, because God created us. Second, because we are not able to create a perfect god using only our limited tools.
We can imagine such a god, but we can't create one.
I would settle for an imperfect God if it would show up for baseball practice and pay child support to we, the latch key kids.
Asking God to be ignorant, limited by the laws of physics, do evil, all seem to be impossible under any traditional definition of God.
I don't believe we are God's "playtoys." We are His children.
1god
noun \ˈgäd also ˈgȯd\
Definition of GOD
1
capitalized : the supreme or ultimate reality: as
a : the Being perfect in power, wisdom, and goodness who is worshipped as creator and ruler of the universe
b Christian Science : the incorporeal divine Principle ruling over all as eternal Spirit : infinite Mind
2
: a being or object believed to have more than natural attributes and powers and to require human worship; specifically : one controlling a particular aspect or part of reality
But in all actuality, I don't want a god to rule over me, I want a friend to share life with. Doesn't want my soul, doesn't tell me what to do under pain of eternal torment, just there to share with me as I share with him. Or her. Whichever. A shoulder to cry on, a fellow person to talk to, a hard kick in the - annnyyway, haha. I don't want a master. I don't want a king. I want a friend.
afterinfinityBut in all actuality, I don't want a god to rule over me, I want a friend to share life with. Doesn't want my soul, doesn't tell me what to do under pain of eternal torment, just there to share with me as I share with him. Or her. Whichever. A shoulder to cry on, a fellow person to talk to, a hard kick in the - annnyyway, haha. I don't want a master. I don't want a king. I want a friend.
charles1952
Doesn't much matter what we want now, does it? What matters is what's true, what's reality. If the Universe is not what you want, well, learn to adjust.
Or, buy a spaniel.
Originally posted by charles1952
reply to post by vethumanbeing
Dear vethumanbeing,
This is becoming much more interesting than I thought it would. Thank you. You've opened up a fascinating subject. What role does god play in our daily lives?
I ask your forgiveness. It's 2:30 a.m. here. May I continue this tomorrow?
I would settle for an imperfect God if it would show up for baseball practice and pay child support to we, the latch key kids.
AfterInfinity
And your god isn't what I look for in a friend. I don't believe in perfection, and I don't hold well with anyone who insists in dragging me along on their pointless quest to achieve it. Perfection is a resistance of motion, and resistance of motion creates friction, then flames. You gotta keep moving. Motion is change, change creates causality, causality introduces a vast web of potential futures that all involve trial and error because that's how we learn, it's how we think and how we feel and how we live. Perfection and immortality are stupid dreams to chase after, because every baddie who ever has got beat in the end. They found the perfection of indesire and the immortality of timelessness. But they lost their lives.
Doesn't much matter what we want now, does it?
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
This question is posed to all practitioners of the Christian faith. Let's say "God" has two choices:
1. Destroy himself to preserve the universe. His death would invoke an eternity of peace and prosperity for all living creatures throughout the universe. In destroying himself, he would never again be able to exist in any form. His only remaining traces would be his creations.
2. Destroy the universe to preserve his own existence. The continued existence of the universe would weaken him until he could no longer do anything but enjoy the agonized slumber of an old man suffering perpetual degeneration, for as long as he also exists. Should he destroy the universe, he would be unable to create a new one.
To the best of your Christian knowledge, what would he choose? And remember - these are the only two options allowed in answering this question.
What Would God Do? Heh heh heh...
To explain what God would do firstly require Gods perception. And God's perception is beyond our understanding. God could never sacrifice himself without continuing to play His role in existence, since God is the force/spirit that sustains all in the eternal and infinite universe.
edit on 6-9-2013 by BlackSunApocalypse because: (no reason given)