It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Hi Jigger, Mistakes go against something right, whose right did we error from? How do we know what we did is wrong? The basic, God gives everyone a conscience...and much more... colbe
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
Hi Jigger, Mistakes go against something right, whose right did we error from? How do we know what we did is wrong? The basic, God gives everyone a conscience...and much more... colbe
Hi Colbe, I must say this thread has been interesting. Thanks for that. I have a multiple scenario for you to consider:
1. You find a $20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. Not a soul around. You pick up the money and put it in your pocket.
2. You find a $20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. You see a lone man walking a half mile away (too far to chase after). You pick up the money and put it in your pocket.
3. You find a $20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. You see a lone man walking fifty feet away. You pick up the money and put it in your pocket.
4. You find a $20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. You see a lone man walking ten feet away. You pick up the money and put it in your pocket.
5. You find a $20 dollar bill on the sidewalk. A lone man is right there and says, "That's my $20. I dropped it." You pick up the money and put it in your pocket.
Now, if a god gave everyone a conscience then everyone will choose the same scenarios to call them a right thing to do, with the other scenarios a wrong thing to do. Do you believe everyone on the planet will choose the exact same ones? If you don't believe it, then the conscience you speak of was created by man through conditioning and life experiences. Not god.
I choose 1, 2, and 3 as okay to do. Number 4 is iffy. Number five is just mean. And yet, I know that even with number 1, somebody owned that money. So why would it be okay to take the money with no one around to claim it, and not okay to take it with the man standing right in front me? If I just left the money on the ground I'd consider myself a fool. I could weigh a thousand pros and cons on this, so our consciousness is far from being a solid foundation given to us by a god.edit on 4/10/2013 by jiggerj because: (no reason given)
You receive God's grace in your soul for the first time in Baptism
you will find the entire writing that contains Pope John Paul quotes about conscience,
Originally posted by colbe
We atone for our sins here by our sufferings, acts of love and prayers said. If not completed here, we make reparation over the veil in Purgatory.
.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
You receive God's grace in your soul for the first time in Baptism
When my daughter died at 1 month old, my wife totally freaked out because she was sure our daughter would spent eternity in hell because she wasn't baptized. I took her to a priest and he said what I had always believed; baptism is merely an initiation into the catholic faith. That's all.
you will find the entire writing that contains Pope John Paul quotes about conscience,
All of these teachings are based on the pope's belief in a god, and that belief comes from one book, the bible. There is absolutely no evidence of a god's input into our consciousness, otherwise every intellectually challenged person would not be able to escape god's input. Yet, so many of them have no idea about right and wrong. Psychopaths do not have a moral compass. To imply that a god gave us a conscience is to say that he is imperfect and weak because he didn't have the power to bestow a conscience on the mentally challenged.
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
Sorry, Colbe, I find Aquinas' statement to be just wrong. His thoughts are all based on the belief in a supernatural being. Here's the line that hit me the most: we have no remorse or compunction on breaking merely human law.
There are many people (including myself) that won't murder - not because of a fear of spending eternity in hell, but out of fear of spending a lifetime in prison.
I would never think of getting rich from selling drugs simply because it's against the law of the society I live in. I might've done it if it wasn't against the law because I have no reservations about giving cigarettes to those that bum them from me. I won't give them to teenagers because it's against the law, not because it's against some god.
I would never take another man's wife because the man is my fellow human being. If I take from him I am making it okay for others to take from me. We don't need a god to be good.
Originally posted by colbe
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
Sorry, Colbe, I find Aquinas' statement to be just wrong. His thoughts are all based on the belief in a supernatural being. Here's the line that hit me the most: we have no remorse or compunction on breaking merely human law.
There are many people (including myself) that won't murder - not because of a fear of spending eternity in hell, but out of fear of spending a lifetime in prison.
I would never think of getting rich from selling drugs simply because it's against the law of the society I live in. I might've done it if it wasn't against the law because I have no reservations about giving cigarettes to those that bum them from me. I won't give them to teenagers because it's against the law, not because it's against some god.
I would never take another man's wife because the man is my fellow human being. If I take from him I am making it okay for others to take from me. We don't need a god to be good.
Originally posted by Logos23
Originally posted by colbe
We atone for our sins here by our sufferings, acts of love and prayers said. If not completed here, we make reparation over the veil in Purgatory.
.
So why did God bother sending Jesus to live on earth and die on the cross?...by your account it seem's we didn't need him.....
Originally posted by jiggerj
reply to post by colbe
Sorry, Colbe, I find Aquinas' statement to be just wrong. His thoughts are all based on the belief in a supernatural being. Here's the line that hit me the most: we have no remorse or compunction on breaking merely human law.
There are many people (including myself) that won't murder - not because of a fear of spending eternity in hell, but out of fear of spending a lifetime in prison.
I would never think of getting rich from selling drugs simply because it's against the law of the society I live in. I might've done it if it wasn't against the law because I have no reservations about giving cigarettes to those that bum them from me. I won't give them to teenagers because it's against the law, not because it's against some god.
I would never take another man's wife because the man is my fellow human being. If I take from him I am making it okay for others to take from me. We don't need a god to be good.
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by colbe
jigger, your wife was Catholic and you never were?
reply to post by colbe
And where do you think LAWS stem from from, the natural law and conscience. God has put Himself on our hearts by the natural law and conscience. Yes you need God to be good, God is the source of all good.
* If you have a MORTAL sin on your soul, you must go to Confession BEFORE you receive Communion on the Feast of Divine Mercy.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by colbe
* If you have a MORTAL sin on your soul, you must go to Confession BEFORE you receive Communion on the Feast of Divine Mercy.
Or else I will not be forgiven. I get it. Oh well. Because I want a narcissistic egomaniac's favor anyway. He preaches humility, but practices pride. He preaches peace, but deals in violence. He talks of generosity, but prefers to make bargains. We must grant him our souls and our eternal and utter fealty before he lifts a finger to correct the mistakes that he has made.
And yet, I must be forgiven for my actions. When has he ever apologized? I suppose that vacation he took during the Holocaust was just a misunderstanding. I suppose the Japanese bombing Pearl Harbor, or the necessity for the nukes to be dropped on their cities, was all just a miscalculation. I suppose every single mass murder and every single tragedy is completely exonerable in the eyes of the almighty as long as he's the one responsible for them. But if someone is to feel love and attraction for another of the same gender, that's a sin worthy of eternal damnation?
Seems legit.