It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Remember the vehicles surrounding the WTC; they were absolutely incinerated. it is not possible that a building collapse would cause such intense heat at street level.
There were hundreds of vehicles which stood where they parked with the tires, interior, anything that was not metal - gone! Burnt into the air!
Originally posted by samkent
Remember the vehicles surrounding the WTC; they were absolutely incinerated. it is not possible that a building collapse would cause such intense heat at street level.
There were hundreds of vehicles which stood where they parked with the tires, interior, anything that was not metal - gone! Burnt into the air!
My thoughts are these:
You are stuck in traffic. Debris starts raining down. Many people left their cars running and simply ran like heck.
Debris from 80 stories up punches through the windshield/dash/hood and wreaks havok on the electrical system.
You end up with car fires. Not a surprise.
Originally posted by bacci0909
Originally posted by intrptr
Maybe a floor or two would "crush" people.
911 collapse was a hi speed blender filled with steel girders, blocks of cement, ground glass and office furniture.
Oh yah, and a few bits of flesh.
Ahh, ladies and gentlemen we have the newly developed "high-speed blender effect". As with the pancake theory and the suggestion that the "plane" that hit the pentagons wings vaporized upon impact, we are again supposed to allow the events of this fateful day to defy any resemblance of basic physics and common-sense logic. Got it
thousands of pre-planted charges that reduced the concrete in the buildings to a fine powder
Originally posted by gladtobehere
reply to post by Wrabbit2000
No, I'm sure Iran loves us. They have every reason to.
We overthrew their democratically elected leader in 1953, installed a brutal dictator for the next 30 years, had one of our puppets attack them leading to a million dead, have imposed sanctions and have threatened them countless times.
While this story can be found on Press TV's site, it was written by good ol' American, Dr. Kevin Barrett.
Logically if there were that many bodies before the collapse, there should be that many after the collapse, high speed grinder? Unless that is, they were not there, in the first place. Reports can be pencil whipped, simple.
The only exception I can accept is those people who were in direct contact with the crashing aircraft. There wouldn't be much left of them, but how many would that be? I would guess 120 or so.
The people who were said to be on the aircraft, their bodies would still be in the aircraft wreckage on the floors they crashed into. And again, this would be true, if, they were there, in the first place. It is just as simple as it gets.
Originally posted by Kharron
Thermite fueled fires perhaps? Lots of bodies were probably incinerated.
I think that, that, would be a unsafe assumption. There "whereabouts" is unknown.
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
reply to post by All Seeing Eye
Well yes one would assume that if the "number" was an estimate that it must be off due to more people evacuating the building than estimated....BUT this number represents the names of those missing and presumed dead who did not come forth in over a decade to set the record straight. Ergo you have to assume that they did die.