It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
Mexico and US are a little different. I mean drug lords run that country.
Let's try to keep crypto-racism out of this thread. Thanks.
Originally posted by SonsOfTheMeek
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
Mexico and US are a little different. I mean drug lords run that country.
Let's try to keep crypto-racism out of this thread. Thanks.
Mexico isn't a race, it's a nation. What a bizzare attempt to bait people into a race argument. Keep your inferences to yourself. Thanks.
Keep your inferences to yourself. Thanks.
They don't know that the car they attempted to stop was tourist. All they knew was that it ran from them when they attempted to stop it. They had no idea who was in the car, someone they were seeking to arrest or a a group or people passing through.
So then they probably shouldn't have shot it up.
Also, as much as I commend them for what they're doing, caution is necessary as well. They really have no official authority at this point and no citizen should be forced to cower under their presence just as much as a corrupt police force.
The car full of tourists really had no requirement to stop for them. Honestly, would YOU have stopped? I highly doubt it if you were to answer honestly.
Let's say you're driving home on your way from work in an area you KNOW if rife with crime, corruption, etc. Would you stop for a group of ten men with guns and bandannas?
It's great they want to overthrow the bad guys but you cannot go around shooting up unknown people. That's my main bone to pick.
Sorry but I get the impression you're arguing for the sake of arguing.
One car of tourists refused to stop so the vigilantes fired on them, wounding at least one.
Originally posted by MrWendal
reply to post by AshleyD
The reason I connected the statements to Mexico to that of the USA by comparison has more to do with your very first words in your original post.
"Good for them!"
While I agree, yes it is good for them, when will it be "good for us"? We (all of us) are usually very quick to applaud the efforts of others who stand up for their rights, while doing nothing for ourselves or to protect our rights.
Originally posted by AshleyD
On one hand, GOOD FOR THEM! If the government fails the people, the people should have the right to rectify things. Mexico is a cesspool of corruption where the citizens are terrified and abused.
On the other hand, it looks like the vigilantes are a bit of a loose cannon. For instance, the article lists one example where they created a checkpoint. One car of tourists refused to stop so the vigilantes fired on them, wounding at least one.
I cannot approve of that. If I was driving along with my family and came across a group of men with guns flagging us down, I'd try to keep driving, too.
If they can get that type of stuff under check then I could approve. You just can't become what you hate.
Hopefully they can become the heroes the country desperately needs.
Originally posted by AshleyD
reply to post by HandyDandy
Yes. We shouldnt be over there IMO but that is another thread.
Originally posted by murphy22
reply to post by walliswallis
I'm an Irish American. Should I be offended if he said Irish go home?
Originally posted by walliswallis
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
Mexico and US are a little different. I mean drug lords run that country.
Let's try to keep crypto-racism out of this thread. Thanks.
edit on 28-3-2013 by walliswallis because: (no reason given)