It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by jimmyx
my 2 cents...it's all about evolution...we humans have evolved to live on our world. we recognize some "senses" and discarded others, for our immediate survivial. if you cannot hear a predator and through that sound know how to protect yourself, all the other senses are useless. if you can see only infrared, poisonous plants, and cold blooded animals would kill you...etc.... we have these senses, because those have allowed our species to survive, nothing more.edit on 26-3-2013 by jimmyx because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by masta12d
reply to post by Theflyingweldsman
Oh my favorite crayon is blue.
Originally posted by masta12d
I posted this on a thread and then realized perhaps I can actually have these genuine questions answered by all you smart science and philosophy folks out there.
The only real truth is what your brain perceives as fact, no? What is real?
Is a red crayon really red? Or is it every color but red?
Isn't everything we perceive really upside down and backwards and its our retinas that flip and rotate it to what we see? How would life look if we saw things just as they were? I'd imagine pretty damn confusing.
What if we could see at all wavelengths? But not the ability to switch, simply forced to view the world in infa-red, gamma, etc etc. would we be able to navigate the earth like this or would everything just be a wall of light that you couldn't see anything? Much like staring at the sun from 5 feet away.
What if you heard all sound waves at all levels? Why are we limited to such a small fraction of sound waves?
Since are ability to see and hear this universe is only a fraction of what is really out there right in front of our faces.
Our reality isn't reality at all. Kinda like playing a 16 bit video game but you can only move within 1 bit.
The truth is stranger then fiction it seems. Anyone want to tackle these question to paint a portrait of what our world really looks like without all these filters?
Originally posted by emeris
reply to post by Theflyingweldsman
Questions= Confusion
Answers= Understanding
Confusion= Disturbance
Understanding= Peace
So what we really want is to move from a disturbed state of mind to a peaceful state of mind.
When a question appears in the mind the question IS the disturbance and when the question is answered it disappears and peace is left over. So we seek the answer merely to get rid of the irritating question. The question is the itch and the answer is the scratch. There may be some pleasure in the scratching but what we really seek is the end of the itching.
So when we say we want all the answers what we really mean is we want peace. But as soon as one question is answered another one pops up. And another and another and another. So peace is to be found by learning to still the mind. Not that you wont still ask questions sometimes but you will have the ability to stop and rest in perfect repose.
This is what meditation is: practicing a technique that stills the mind. A mind that goes on questioning without the ability to stop and rest is an insane mind and this is why we see so much insanity caused by individuals and humanity as a whole.
So really what im trying to say is spend a little time practicing meditation and not just running around in circles in your mind.
Originally posted by masta12d
reply to post by emeris
sadly my brain refuses to stop thinking if I'm not meditating and it's quite the challenge to free the mind even then.
But yes I have many itches to scratch and I also know I will ask these things until the end of my existence as I know it. I can say this confidently because I am humbled by the fact that no matter how much I learn, I won't learn all that I wish.
Originally posted by masta12d
Originally posted by jiggerj
Originally posted by masta12d
a red crayon is every color but red, as is the fact that our eye flip and rotate everything we see. Perhaps it's really a fact your walking on the ceiling.
We see red because of the sun and the light we use. Hold that crayon under different colored lights and it won't be red anymore.
True enough but then we are filtering again aren't we?
Originally posted by masta12d
reply to post by NorEaster
I get what your saying. But your responses are from your perceptions and your understanding of those perceptions. If we only exist in a fraction of the known universe, and again, not in the meaning of physical space, but in all densities. Then wouldn't it stand to reason our current perception of reality is fundamentally flawed? Kinda like looking at a 1000 piece jigsaw and only having one piece. And wouldn't you know it, the damn thing is all blue. *sigh* perhaps it's a skyline or an ocean? Perhaps just a piece of a giants blue sweater.
Furthermore, if we were born with the ability to see in all wavelengths, to hear in all and to be in all and it was in fact for our survival. I don't know perhaps because we are all Gods for example. And we had to fight for our existence so protecting ourselves required the use of all wave lengths. In that context, wouldn't we be able to interact in the hodgepodge of sensory override?
Originally posted by Theflyingweldsman
reply to post by masta12d
Also, seeing how I have one of the oldest profiles on ATS wouldn't it stand to reason that I was probably closer to adolescence at the time of creation of my profile?
No offence, Masta, but as you are a long term member,
hasn't all this been discussed many times on ATS?
My point is that these seem like banal, adolescent questions.
The eye assigns colour to a range of light wavelengths
that may not correspond with the colour of the wavelength itself.
We have cones in the eye which detect red, green, and yellow.
But we only detect light and colour with our eyes. (Imagine a camera lens and a CCD chip)
What we percieve is processed by our brains in a similar way to how computers process Holograms.
The brain learns which colours are which and uses this information to process visual information,
as it does with acoustic and sensory information.
Only smells are transported directly to the brain, otherwise its in a black, sealed room,
with no contact to the outside world except the electrical signals which it processes.
The world we see is made of light. How we see it depends on how the light reaches our eyes.
The sky is blue because blue frequency light is scattered by Nitrogen and oxygen molecules (Air) more than lower frequencies. Our eyes dont pick up indigo or violet very well unless it is directed, so the sky looks like a mixture of all light frequencies (white) and Blue, so it's Light blue.
The sun is yellow because yellow is the median colour in our visible light spectrum. It looks red when the sun is low, as light is scattered more and more by dust and water vapour in the lower atmosphere (air).
The tomato looks red, because the pigment "lycopene" absorbs green and blue frequencies, but reflects red light..
A leaf is green because "chlorophyll" absorbs red and blue frequencies and reflects green light.
Your favorite crayon is red because the dye in the crayon absorbs or scatters all other frequencies of light.
It is red because light (in the red bit of the spectrum of visible light) is reflected towards your eyes
Change the colour of the light source and you change the colour of the Crayon.
Every one percieves the world around them from inside a black box of sensory information.
The whole world is inside your head, an interactive personal holographic reality.
Everyones eyes have different amounts of each type of cone receptor, yet everyone, given similar circumstances percieves the world of colour exactly the same. You "see" with your brain, not with your eyes.
You see with your brain
That's why your favorite Crayon is Red.
Peace.
edit on 26/3/2013 by Theflyingweldsman because: never ruin an apology with an excuse
I didnt think the OPs questions are banal or adolescent. Its seems many people didnt understand what he meant with the red statement. If an object absorbs every color except red, doesnt that mean that object is every color except red in reality?
If an object absorbs every color except red, doesnt that mean that object is every color except red in reality?