It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
2:23 "And if ye are in doubt as to what We have
revealed from time to time to Our
servant, then produce a Sura like thereunto; and call your witnesses or helpers (If there are any) besides God,
if your (doubts) are true."
17:88 "Say: 'If the whole of mankind and Jinns
were to gather together to produce the like of this Qur'an, they could not produce the like thereof, even if they
backed up each other with help and
support.'"
Inna aAtayna kal kawthar
Fasalli li rabbika wanhar
Inna shani-aka huwal abtar
Verily We have given to you the
Abundance
So pray to your Lord and sacrifice
Indeed your enemy is the one who is
cut off
Throughout the centuries thinkers,
poets, theologians and literary critics
have attempted to challenge the
Qur’an. Some of these challengers
include Musaylamah, Ibn Al-Mukaffa‘, Abu’l-’Ala Al-Marri, Yahya b. Al-Hakam
al-Ghazal, Sayyid ‘Ali Muhammad, Ibn
al-Rawandi, Bassar bin Burd, Sahib Ibn
‘Abbad, Abu’l – ‘Atahiya and the
contemporary Christian Missionaries
who developed the ‘True Furqan’. Without going into an analysis of why
Muslim and non-Muslim scholars have
agreed that those who have
attempted to challenge the Qur’an
have failed, the summary below
should suffice: Even though the challengers have had
the same set of ‘tools’, which are the
29 letters, finite grammatical rules and
the blue print of the challenge – which
is the Qur’an itself; they have failed to:
1. Replicate the Qur’an's literary form
2. Match the unique linguistic genre of
the Qur’an
3. Select and arrange words like that
of the Qur’an.
4. Select and arrange particles like that of the Qur’an.
5. Match the Qur’ans phonetic
superiority.
6. Equal the frequency of rhetorical
devices
7. Match the level of informativity
8. Equal the Qur’ans conciseness and
flexibility
For example if we take Musaylamah’s
attempt to challenge the Qur’an,
The elephant.
What is the elephant?
And who shall tell you what is the
elephant?
He has a ropy tail and a long trunk.
This is a [mere] trifle of our Lord’s creations.
it can be clearly seen, with reference to
the Arabic original, that the style of his
speech is in the kahin style of rhymed
prose. It lacks informativity and the
words and phrases that have been
used can be replaced with words that will express greater meaning and
produce more eloquent discourse. In
other words from a literary and
stylistics point of view, this challenge
fails.
below is a
summary of chapter al-Kawthar’s
literary and linguistic features:
1. Unique Literary Form
2. Unique Linguistic Genre
3. Abundance of rhetorical devices/
features:
- Emphasis
- Multiple Meaning
- Iltifaat
- Grammatical shift
- Word order and Arrangement
- Ellipsis
- Conceptual Relatedness
(Intertextuality)
- Intensification
- Choice of words & Particles
- Phonetics
- Semantically Orientated Repetition
- Intimacy
- Exaggeration
- Rebuke and contempt
- Conciseness
- Flexibility
- Prophesy/Factual
Rhythm and Sound
The Qur’an has been described as an
“inimitable symphony” whose rhythm
moves men to tears and ecstasy. The
Qur’an not only selects the most apt
words and phrases, but also achieves
a unique sound within a unique literary form. This chapter has the
following verse end rhyme:
Kawthar…
nhar…
tar
What is noticeable about the rhyme in
this chapter is that the end rhyme of
the last two verses resonate the sound
of the word ‘al-kawthar’, what is
meant here is as if the sound of the
word ‘al-kawthar’ is extended to support the overall theme that the
Prophet has really been given an
Abundance. It is as though the word
‘al-kawthar’ has been exaggerated
and phonetically elongated to further
highlight its meaning and enhance the overall persuasive power of the
structure.
There are major opinions of the
reason for this revelation. The first
opinion is that Al-`As bin Wa’il would
say, whenever the Prophet would be
mentioned (in his presence), `Leave
him, for indeed he is a man who is cut off having no descendants. So when
he dies he will not be remembered.’
Therefore this chapter was revealed to
console the Prophet.
The other opinion is that Abu Lahab,
another leading member of the
Quraish, exlaimed `Muhammad has
been cut off (i.e., from progeny)
tonight.’ when the Prophet’s son
passed away.
What makes this chapter a prophesy
and factual is the events that took
place after this revelation.
With regards to Abu Lahab he died of
a form of plague and was not buried
by his sons until one the leading tribe
leaders noticed how his body was
rotting. His sons eventually placed the
remains of the body on a wall and threw stones on it. Abu Lahab had lost
power, honour and dignity.(cut off)
‘As bin Wa’il faced similar humiliation.
His sons had converted to Islam thus
becoming his enemies, as he was an
active enemy of Islam. Furthermore his
sons did not take any inheritance from
him. So in reality his lineage was broken. (cut off)
This is Prophetic and factual.
Originally posted by tinhattribunal
upon a time, once it happened thus,
as certain men took ink to fine skin;
set under (them), they percieved not their demise.
But that doesn't mean the world should convert to Islam.
The Qur'an
was given to a particular time and
place, and to the people whose
unique temperament and psychology
and style was forged in that time and place.
As are the sacred inspired texts of all
religions.
Originally posted by logical7
reply to post by BlueMule
But that doesn't mean the world should convert to Islam.
does it at least mean that it should be read/heard to find what the Divine is saying?
not true, Qur'an itself says its for all mankind and its the last revealation to the last Prophet, so if you say its from The Divine then how do you contradict what it says?
Originally posted by logical7
Qur'an itself says its for all mankind and its the last revealation to the last Prophet,
Originally posted by FlyersFan
Originally posted by logical7
Qur'an itself says its for all mankind and its the last revealation to the last Prophet,
Isn't that circular logic? How can something prove it's true simply by saying it's true?
I could say that I am a prophet but just because I say it doesn't mean it's true.
The Quran can claim it's for everyone and a revelation from God .. but without any
proof to back it up, it's just one claim among many similar ones in the world.
not true, Qur'an itself says its for all
mankind and its the last revealation to
the last Prophet, so if you say its from
The Divine then how do you contradict
what it says?
i never like circular logic, have to tolerate it a lot from scripture bashing posters,
my response was to Bluemule when he had already accepted that Qur'an is from The Divine. You misquoted me, here's what i said
Originally posted by FlyersFan
reply to post by logical7
Ahhhh .... okay. I read it as you saying something totally different.
It's all good.
not true, Qur'an itself says its for all mankind and its the last revealation to the last Prophet
It may say that, log7, but that doesn't mean what BlueMule says isn't true. The Bible, I believe, also says that it's for all mankind forever, the be-all and end-all. Sorry, but no religion has a monopoly on the Truth
Because it's a sacred text for a certain unique environment and temperament and psychology and style... a psychology which wants to impose itself on all mankind. It's understandable. I don't judge. It told them what they needed to hear.
Truth will prevail.
Between a convenient lie and a terrible truth, the human species will always choose that which gives it the strength to continue fighting for survival.
If you think truth will prevail, you have
severely underestimated the dirty
tactics of the human condition.
It talks about One God, respecting all prophets equally and that all scriptures are from the same Source. Isn't it an all accepting idea?
Its destroys racism and even nationalism both of which have been and still are two major factors that keep people divided.
Doesnt it have universal appeal?