Are We All Martians? How Recent Discoveries Raise That Possibility.

Last week NASA announced a new discovery by the Curiosity rover that increased the likelihood that we may have had cousins on Mars.

(visit the link for the full news article)
That's utter rubbish,my cousin lives in Waltham Abbey.

Sorry to say this but you can not have cross species breeding that's why cats don't breed with dogs etc. We have one species of human at this time homo sapiens who have slight differences based on environmental factors.

reply to post by Hybrid00


There are only 2 species of human being on earth.

Negative and Positive.

One species will produce antibodies against the other to curb reproduction because it's not natural.

Yes, this is my point that Rh negative blood has 8% of it's dna from an unknown and untraceable source.


Before you go spouting more nonsense about 4 races of human you should look at the blood and make sensible comments. Do any of those races have trouble breeding? No, only negative and postive blood do.

reply to post by Knives4eyes



I've seen you post quite a bit of this Rh-neg rhetoric on here. It's admittedly rather amusing because it's pretty much pseudoscience that makes somewhat uncommon people feel extraordinary... but then becomes disconcerting because of the superiority complex it gives them at the expense of everyone else.

Have you got any concrete evidence suggesting at extraterrestrial origin for this blood type? What about all the animals which don't have the Rh factor (and are therefore Rh negative)?

That being said, I'm stoked for this reveal in December. Of course, we are still Earthlings no matter what but... damn...

reply to post by Knives4eyes


You are obviously human than. There are four species! Not two! Rh doesn't make them a different species, just a cross between two or more, an African and an Asian both rh negative produce a rh positive child. Your argument is irrelevant!

Originally posted by ihavenoaccount
reply to post by Knives4eyes

 

I've seen you post quite a bit of this Rh-neg rhetoric on here. It's admittedly rather amusing because it's pretty much pseudoscience that makes somewhat uncommon people feel extraordinary... but then becomes disconcerting because of the superiority complex it gives them at the expense of everyone else.

Have you got any concrete evidence suggesting at extraterrestrial origin for this blood type? What about all the animals which don't have the Rh factor (and are therefore Rh negative)?

That being said, I'm stoked for this reveal in December. Of course, we are still Earthlings no matter what but... damn...

Okay your superiority theory might be true if I had negative blood, I am not suggesting an extraterrestrial origin for this blood type and yes I do realize copper rich blood animals such as lizards and insects exist on earth. My only proof is the relative lack of history regarding negative blood while positive can be traced millions of years back.

I can only tie together a long string of coincidences through math,science,history and religion that leads me to my belief that Rh- blood is from the future.

The only part that would make you a believer in less than a second is when/IF you ever witness a dimensional vehicle 'jumping' or you can continue to look at the differences in blood.

Originally posted by Hybrid00
reply to post by Knives4eyes

 

You are obviously human than. There are four species! Not two! Rh doesn't make them a different species, just a cross between two or more, an African and an Asian both rh negative produce a rh positive child. Your argument is irrelevant!

edit on 24-3-2013 by Hybrid00 because: Auto-correct type-o

Rh- and a RH- do not make a positive , this isn't math, they make a negative baby only.

Your argument is less than irrelevant, please at least double check what you type.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


Lmfao, they are two different human species that are both negative and interbreeding causes a positive, can you actually see what you write? Honestly, grow a brain.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


There is no racism in the future, this is how important blood is. There are carriers of Rh-negative blood in each 'race' or color of human, there are no exceptions.

Originally posted by Hybrid00
reply to post by Knives4eyes

 

Lmfao, they are two different human species that are both negative and interbreeding causes a positive, can you actually see what you write? Honestly, grow a brain.

Are you a fool? 2 negatives make a negative baby


2 postives cannot make a negative


2 positives with recessive d gene have 25% chance to make a neg baby because half their genotype is negative but recessive.

A negative and a postive when blood is mixed results in a miscarriage or complications. RHOgam is a shot that is used before and after pregnancy for a negative mother carrying a postive baby, it also makes them sterile.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


The future? You see the future do you? You know what is going to happen? Forum rules stop me from telling you my opinion of your intellect.

Originally posted by Hybrid00
reply to post by Knives4eyes

 

The future? You see the future do you? You know what is going to happen? Forum rules stop me from telling you my opinion of your intellect.

That's fine, you've already proven you're an idiot.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


Oh my, get your head from your rectum for a second and comprehend that the parent being positive or negative doesn't affect the outcome when two species successfully breed, tigon and liger are great examples of this, tiger mother and lion father both rh negative produce a rh positive tigon. Either get it or don't, I have things to do and refuse to converse beyond this point with someone that can't even comprehend such a simple concept.

The RH problem was present in other species before humans evolved. and has not stopped us from reaching 6 billion population LOL none issue.

Originally posted by Tachyeon
The RH problem was present in other species before humans evolved. and has not stopped us from reaching 6 billion population LOL none issue.

I'm not sure which other species this has been a problem for, the information regarding negative blood and cross breeding stops at species that would never breed in nature.


So far all I see is a mule and a bunch of stupid cats that can't even breed. Continue, share your enlightenment that I obviously missed.

Just to clarify, I should have mentioned they can breed...just not with optimal results. Results that will further degrade with each attempt.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


www.Angelfire.com...

There ya go, stop looking at the mule in the mirror and see your arrogance

Originally posted by Hybrid00
reply to post by Knives4eyes

 

www.Angelfire.com...

There ya go, stop looking at the mule in the mirror and see your arrogance

Animals that would not exist naturally in nature without man breeding them.

Your self portrait is going to run out of the color stupid with the way you wield your brush.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


Still missing the point. Negative and negative of different species that successfully breed are positive and it is possible, the point has nothing to do with negative and positive or positive and positive. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance; baffle them with bull****) should be your tag, short lived small brained twit!

Originally posted by Hybrid00
reply to post by Knives4eyes

 

Still missing the point. Negative and negative of different species that successfully breed are positive and it is possible, the point has nothing to do with negative and positive or positive and positive. "If you can't dazzle them with brilliance; baffle them with bull****) should be your tag, short lived small brained twit!

NO, you are convuluting the point and dredging it up with your BS. You keep bringing up sterile beasts that cannot breed naturally.

Are you seriously this dumb? For your sake I hope you try to have children with someone of the opposite RH factor so you can experience the pain of multiple stillbirths and miscarriages, you silly twit.