Are We All Martians? How Recent Discoveries Raise That Possibility.

Are We All Martians? How Recent Discoveries Raise That Possibility.

www.thedailybeast.com

A few weeks ago, a team at Berkeley announced that conditions on comets are sufficient to allow the creation of complex dipeptides, linked groups of amino acids, which could have provided the seeds of life on Earth.


Last week NASA announced a new discovery by the Curiosity rover that increased the likelihood that we may have had cousins on Mars.

If we do eventually find evidence for life on Mars, extant or extinct, the big question will be whether it evolved independently, or whether we will have just discovered evidence of distant cousins. Material routinely travels between Earth and

(visit the link for the full news article)


Related News Links:
www.theweek.co.uk

Related AboveTopSecret.com Discussion Threads:
Mars Rover 'Curiosity' Team Reportedly Will Reveal Major Discovery In December

We are getting closer and closer to finding evidence that there was or is martians on Mars. I wonder of Nasa ever actually finds anything that is walking, breathing, if they will ever actually let us know.

I also wonder if there is anything on Mars if it would likely destroy the curiosity rover so it would not be discovered.

www.thedailybeast.com
(visit the link for the full news article)

reply to post by theone88


And if they do find it, I wonder if they'll call it 'Marvin'
2nd

reply to post by theone88


I think it is unlikely that anything is still living on Mars, other than some microbes maybe deep under the surface.

As far as the Curiosity rover, well Spirit and Opportunity have been there for over five years and they are fine So I think that is unlikely as well. Not to mention destruction of a rover would be confirmation of a presence by itself, so that would not be a logical coarse of action by any intelligent being.

We are all Earthlings if we were born here regardless of how our predecesors came to live here.

Martians would be born on Mars, and if Mars was seeded from somewhere else (highly probable "if" the scenario in the OP exists) then they would be named after the planet they were origanally from and so on and so on.

Personally I believe everything is made from little bits of everyrthing else so definition of beings to specific locations becomes a little mute.

We just "are", have always been, and will always be. Right now, "this" is the configuration of "stuff" on it's endless journey.

Ball of dirt with bugs on it.

you should read about the viking lander back in 1975

The Viking landers conducted biological experiments designed to detect life in the Martian soil (if it existed) with experiments designed by three separate teams, under the direction of chief scientist Gerald Soffen of NASA. One experiment turned positive for the detection of metabolism (current life), but based on the results of the other two experiments that failed to reveal any organic molecules in the soil, most scientists became convinced that the positive results were likely caused by non-biological chemical reactions from highly oxidizing soil conditions.[11]

en.wikipedia.org...

it was a 1/3 result for life back then,
but they used different methods of detection.

IMHO
they have already found life on mars, it was just 33% likely which is not enough to satisfy the bofins

xploder

I actually watched this video earlier and something else that may be worth considering, what if we were already walking and evolved enough to create technology before we came to this planet?

Nothing about the history of the human race can obviously be discounted, but there are some true mysteries in archaeology that have yet to be answered:

Interesting possibility.

Although the opposite may have been true and microbial life from Earth may have reached Mars.

If life colonized one planet from the other, I'd think Mars to Earth was the likelier route. Mars, being smaller and less massive than Earth, is likely to have to cooled enough for life to take hold there, before such conditions prevailed on our planet. Also, it has been determined that it is much easier for material from Mars to end up on Earth, due to asteroid impacts, than the other way around.

reply to post by Zcustosmorum

It would be nice to see a written source for this, including footnotes, photos, and references that can be checkd.
i deduct 50 percent for creepy music and added irrelevant visuals.

reply to post by Ross 54


Transpermia is very real and we even have some rocks from space that have life on them.

The problem is that people always overlook the obvious. I believe in intervention. The difference is that life was replanted here by another intelligence.

I even have a theory about the food sources that proves that life was brought here. What a coincidence, it even states in the bible that all life was brought here, and it sure looks like it.

www.youtube.com...


Here's an entertaining perspective on martians.

Hey OP, you may not be far off there...
You obviously know that everything- from plants and trees to rodents and people - have certain frequencies to which we vibrate to.

What you probably did not know is that theres a unique difference between the frequency of a black person and a white person. Whites match the frequency of Mars and Earth matches the frequency of the black race.

Dont call me racist, frequencies are frequencies.




Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

Hey OP, you may not be far off there...
You obviously know that everything- from plants and trees to rodents and people - have certain frequencies to which we vibrate to.

What you probably did not know is that theres a unique difference between the frequency of a black person and a white person. Whites match the frequency of Mars and Earth matches the frequency of the black race.

Dont call me racist, frequencies are frequencies.




Posted Via ATS Mobile: m.abovetopsecret.com

IF some amount of panspermia is not possible then everything is the result of abiogenesis, right? So everything is found where it began. But this seems increasingly unlikely as we can see how planets in a system can share materials through meteor collisions. It seems rather likely that some amount of panspermia is possible. HOwever, because research has not supported the possibility of life surviving interstellar journeys between stars, there does seem to be a limit.

It could be that organisms survive interstellar journeys via rogue planets. But this is speculation and of course is not backed up by any research that I know of. But rogue planets would seem tobe large enough to protect against cosmic radiation. They may have enoguh atmosphere and internal heating to drive life processes. It might not develop to the level on earth, but it could be possible? This is especially true if one can imagine life on Europea, for example. Europa has no atmosphere and is basically frozen. Any life would be trapped in its subsurface layer of deep ocean.

My opinion is if we do not locate any simple organisms in our solar system then the odds of intelligent life might fall considerably. For there tobe intelligent life, simple life must proliferate. However, this is just my own feeling. It could be wrong because this is a complex universe.

But whatever our expectations are now we do not know yet. We have to explore to know.

Originally posted by darkstar57
reply to post by Zcustosmorum

 

It would be nice to see a written source for this, including footnotes, photos, and references that can be checkd.
i deduct 50 percent for creepy music and added irrelevant visuals.

As far as I'm concerned mate, MSM archaeology will not accept anything that proves the human race is older than most consider at the moment, just as astrobiologists refuse to consider some UFO reports as evidence of alien existence.

There are problems with both of these fields on this subject and I think the possibilities must be examined.

reply to post by theone88


Interesting, but even if that were the cause of life's beginnings it would still be considered native as it grew there. But it is believed that Caucasian humans are a result of interbreeding between 'grey aliens' and native dark skinned humans. So some merit to the story lol

reply to post by Hybrid00


Let me correct you.

Blood is the biggest conspiracy possible, it is the mother of all conspiracies.

When you say man mated with grey, do you realize there are 2 kinds of human that exist on earth today?

1 makes the theory of evolution seem plausible
1 makes religion seem right


If you do not believe look into blood, look at the negative and positive rhesus phenotype.

The Mars photos showing large crystal looking tunnels running through Olympus Mons looked like a subway system running underground. There are other photos that show towers with smoke bellowing out. I would bet 100 bucks there are entities living under ground on Mars. Even here on earth all the most hi tech military complexes are built under ground.

reply to post by Knives4eyes


It is a genetic marker that shows interbreeding of species. There are 4 species of human on earth. Asians Caucasian African and native American are the most well known names for them, they have around 98% of DNA in common, same as between any human race and monkeys. Did you have a point?