Rachel Corrie's Parents Call for Justice in Palestine on 10th Anniversary of Death

Originally posted by bluemirage5
reply to post by schuyler

 

You are 100% correct and I also wish to add.....

from what I have gathered since that incident, Corrie did'nt even want to do the deed but was talked in to it and those with her did'nt even bother to immediately tell the IDF soldier until AFTER the bulldozer hit her. She was used as collaterial damage by Hamas agents among the Palestinians who were with her at the time - whom were also told not to say a word to the driver of the bulldozer until the deed was done. I think there is enough blame to go around.

I don't know where you get your info from but you are wrong. Here is a video of it happening. The scumbag driving the dozer didn't even call her a person but an object.

Where do you get your twisted version of history at? Who do you think pushed Hitler to let the Jews go to Israel? His Zionist backers that's who.

reply to post by buster2010


Are you refering to 'The Transfer Agreement' by Edwin Black?
How about, 'To Eliminate the Opiate' by Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman?

There appear to be some crossed purposed disagreements here.

Can I ask out of curiosity, a simple Yes/No question, without bringing additional political/revisionist/historical/etc baggage to the table....is there a place in the Middle East/Palestine/Israel/Judah/The Levant, for the Jewish people, as a historically recognised homeland? Yes or No?

Originally posted by buster2010


2. If Iran is developing a peaceful nuclear program they are well within their right to do so.

Yes, Iran has the right to develop a nuclear program if they don't have a holocaust denier for president.

The United States which now opposes Ahmed's nuclear ambitions, because he is a nutcase holocaust denier, was actually one of the countries which helped start Iran's nuclear program.

We have holocaust deniers in America. They are called skinheads. Usually poor whites whoremongers with little education and no direction in their lives. Often bastard children with no paternal influence. And this is who Iran has for a president.

Originally posted by Lucius Driftwood

Where do you get your twisted version of history at? Who do you think pushed Hitler to let the Jews go to Israel? His Zionist backers that's who.

reply to post by buster2010

 

Are you refering to 'The Transfer Agreement' by Edwin Black?
How about, 'To Eliminate the Opiate' by Rabbi Marvin S. Antelman?

There appear to be some crossed purposed disagreements here.

Can I ask out of curiosity, a simple Yes/No question, without bringing additional political/revisionist/historical/etc baggage to the table....is there a place in the Middle East/Palestine/Israel/Judah/The Levant, for the Jewish people, as a historically recognised homeland? Yes or No?

NO
To think someone should be given land back to someone just because it belonged to them thousands of years ago is just plain stupid. And besides it belonged to the Sumerians before the Jews.

Originally posted by Miracula

Originally posted by buster2010


2. If Iran is developing a peaceful nuclear program they are well within their right to do so.

Yes, Iran has the right to develop a nuclear program if they don't have a holocaust denier for president.

The United States which now opposes Ahmed's nuclear ambitions, because he is a nutcase holocaust denier, was actually one of the countries which helped start Iran's nuclear program.

We have holocaust deniers in America. They are called skinheads. Usually poor whites whoremongers with little education and no direction in their lives. Often bastard children with no paternal influence. And this is who Iran has for a president.

edit on 20-3-2013 by Miracula because: bastard children edit

You seem to have a problem telling the difference between a denier and a revisionist. This is understandable seeing how people have been brainwashed over the years. Ahmadinejad has never denied it happened he just wants an accurate accounting of what happened. Maybe if you did a little research instead of instantly believing the propaganda you would know this to be true.

According to the Jewish World Almanac in 1933 there were 15,315,000 Jews. In 1948 there were 15,753,000 Jews. Where's the six million drop?
OFFICIAL RECORDS FROM INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS PROVE "HOLOCAUST" WAS A FRAUD
According to the Red Cross 271,501 people were murdered in the camps and not all of these were Jews.
But this isn't the first time we have heard the 6 million dead. We heard it in 1906, 1919, 1921, and lastly in 1936 this was the one they used to justify stealing Palestine.

Originally posted by buster2010
OFFICIAL RECORDS FROM INTERNATIONAL RED CROSS PROVE "HOLOCAUST" WAS A FRAUD[/url]
According to the Red Cross 271,501 people were murdered in the camps and not all of these were Jews.

I was expecting a holocaust denier to bring that false claim up... which has been explained before here.

e familiar with the argumentational strategy of many Holocaust Deniers may have come across a frequent claim that the ITS Arolsen and ICRC has only documented the deaths of between 300 to 400,000 victims in the German concentration camps. Ever wonder where this figure came from? Biedermann explained how: Biedermann confirmed that as of December 31, 1983, the total number of deaths registered with the Special Registry Office and various other registry offices was 373,468. (11-2515) This figure represented death certificates issued pursuant to received applications and was based, with respect to the Special Registry Office, on camp records kept by the Nazis during the war. (11-2516, 2517) Biedermann agreed that at an international conference held by the International Committee of the Camps in Vienna in 1977, the then director of the ITS, Albert de Cocatrix, gave a speech which indicated that as of December 31, 1976 a total of 357,190 names of persons who died in concentration camps had been registered at the Special Registry Office. Biedermann confirmed that these numbers actually came from the ITS. (12-2640 to 2646) He pointed out, however, that these figures resulted from applications. If an entire family had died, there was no one to make an application for a death certificate. Secondly, the ITS had complete documentation for only two of the twenty-two concentration camps. For the remainder, it had either partial or no documentation. Therefore, if an application was made for a person who had allegedly died in one of these camps, the ITS would not have the records to justify a request to the Special Registry Office for a death certificate. (12-2647) In case there are any dimwits out there, let's just repeat those bolded parts one more time: He pointed out, however, that these figures resulted from applications. If an entire family had died, there was no one to make an application for a death certificate.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

reply to post by buster2010


Sorry but you just won the WTF award with that post.

reply to post by octotom


I disagree. Its in Revelations for a reason. It is prophetic. Khazars are evil. just the other day they were throwing fecal matter on the Palestinians.

Can I ask out of curiosity, a simple Yes/No question, without bringing additional political/revisionist/historical/etc baggage to the table....is there a place in the Middle East/Palestine/Israel/Judah/The Levant, for the Jewish people, as a historically recognised homeland? Yes or No?

NO To think someone should be given land back to someone just because it belonged to them thousands of years ago is just plain stupid. And besides it belonged to the Sumerians before the Jews.

reply to post by buster2010


So at what point is it okay to give back land that has been occupied by another? 50 years? 100 years?
The Ottoman empire owned the land before Britain took it. Should we give it back to them? The 'west bank' belonged to Jordan before the 6 day war. Shouldn't it be rightfully given back to them rather than the palestinians?

Originally posted by buster2010

You seem to have a problem telling the difference between a denier and a revisionist..

Yeah, the Jews left their happy homes and went to Israel because they were being treated well.

Originally posted by phillyhemp
reply to post by octotom

 

. Khazars are evil. .

I've seen some of the Khazars in person. They are very aggressive. However, Israel is composed of more than just khazars.

a reply to: purplemer

The Israeli Supreme Court on Thursday rejected an appeal by the family of Corrie, exonerating the Zionist military of all wrongdoing. The family had challenged a lower court's controversial 2012 ruling.

The family of murdered US activist Rachel Corrie has condemned Israel’s Supreme Court for not holding the military accountable for her death.

source

a reply to: purplemer

bumping this in remembrance of all those that have died in the name of freedom.