It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

Ask me anything regarding spirituality and I will answer humbly

page: 9
28
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Mar, 16 2013 @ 11:23 PM
link   
reply to post by 11118
 


That is an interesting perspective. I will note that it is very difficult for a child to experience the slow, gradual death of a sibling. Being grateful for the experience may be the ideal, but 30 years later -- I am still not complete enough to see it (or god) in this way.

Thank you for posting your ideas on my questions.



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 12:56 AM
link   
Where is the end to the universe? And if there is an end, what is on the other side? The big bang thoery does not explain many things. Like the existence of the universe. Big bang or not the universe existed prior to it. So how can there be an end to the universe, and if there is how can there possibly be an end. I speculate that the universe is like a wall of cubes. Each cube contains another universe. If you hit the wall you come out the other side like a video game.



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 02:07 AM
link   

Originally posted by 11118

Originally posted by Kurius
Since I was four/five, it had always felt funny that I should be here. I never did and will never understand the purpose of existence. It seems our ego tries to justify that we need to exist, we are beautiful, we are to serve the greater good, to be one with God, we need to learn lessons, compassion, etc, etc. I am now inclined to think that our creator really just had nothing better to do, It's all a big practical joke, an amusement park ride, a game. I have read many books and interviews and often surprised that not one seem to even question the basic fundamental essence of being.

Questions:
Why do we exist? What makes us exist, who decides? Why would the creator be silly to not build perfect beings who already knows everything there is to learn? No problem on earth (or anywhere else) is unique or original anymore...why are we so willing to be created only to be subjected to similar entrapment? Why must there be lessons to be learn? Nothing should matter if we don't exist in the first place, shouldn't it? Whom are we really slaves to and what is the grand plan?


We exist because it is our very essence. The decision is not made but simply it is as it is. I am that I am. You can never be anything other than existence otherwise you would not exist in the first place.

You are already a perfect being. You, are in essence, whole and complete. You have all possibilities in potentiation, you may as you are the plenum for manifestation of anything and everything. Yet if the mind is not balanced then the entity will be distorted. Realization of completeness will bring about grace and perfection - this takes practice.

The Creator is the principle of infinity focused into a point of awareness from this point of awareness the Creator inevitably desires to know itself as infinity cannot simply understand itself without seeing the contrast and the reflection betwixt itself. Thus the Creator divides itself into an endless continuum of finite experiences and fragments - because the Creator is infinite all begins and ends in mystery the Creator will never completely understand itself but will always become more and more aware of itself.

The grand plan is simple. The Creator wishes to know itself as the Creator - it is, in the deepest sense, love learning about love.

The lessons and struggles that we experience are beautiful gifts that teach us about love, about ourselves, about the Creator.
edit on 16-3-2013 by 11118 because: (no reason given)


Thanks, but why do you think it is our essence to exist? Why shouldn't it be the essence for all not to exist? Who started the silly idea of existing? Saying "simply it is as it is" seems to denote "there's no reason at all". Is this what you mean...no reason?

Then you appear to imply we are [nothing but] an extension/fragment of the Creator in order for it to know itself as a Creator...(so there is a reason after all!). Anyway, who is this Creator? Why does he/she have to exist and make us the extended slaves? How can we protest?
Why can't the Creator find "love learning about love", "the deepest essence" on his/her own? How do you know for sure this is the "Grand Plan" in the first place? Is there any chance that you are being misled? If not, why not?

Hope your friend is fine.



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 03:05 AM
link   
So do we ever get an answer from you? I want to know.

You gave up?
edit on 17-3-2013 by Izak4K because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 03:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Izak4K
So do we ever get an answer from you? I want to know.

You gave up?
edit on 17-3-2013 by Izak4K because: (no reason given)


Define "we" for the OP and your response might come quicker which i can only "presume" (in my perception).
This is just my personal thoughts on how i would expect a direct answer if i were to pose a question seeking information for myself personally. No disrespect intended as i feel this is a good question worded a little "distorted" unintentionally or intentionally i don't know for sure as it is not "me" asking it hehe



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 04:44 AM
link   

edit on 17-3-2013 by Izak4K because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 05:43 AM
link   
reply to post by Shadow Herder
 


A Trial, never thought about it in that perspective.
Thank you again for your reply! Opens up a new way of thinking



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 06:28 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kurius
reply to post by Itisnowagain
 

It could be genius...or pure evil.
Most seem to [like to] believe the former or something positive. It's always the ego thing...how can we ever be slaves to anything less than love, compassion, brilliance? But there's just possibility that it's all illusion. Like chickens thinking that they are raised because they deserve the feed. When the time comes, they are all harvested.

Watch this short video to see that there is no separate you existing.
youtu.be...
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 06:54 AM
link   
For a couple of years now i have been able to astral project, however i would like it to last longer/ have more control whilst doing so. I feel that i have hit a bit of a roadblock and have not made any progress for a few months now.

Thanks in advance



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 07:19 AM
link   
Where will you stay after your 'death'?
Will you re-appear again in other 'lifeforms' to help us?
If you reappear, will your memory reseted to 0?



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 07:21 AM
link   
Where will you stay after your 'death'?
Will you re-appear again in other 'lifeforms' to help us?
If you reappear, will your memory be reseted to 0?
So far what I learned is without desire, it's impossible to reappear, is that true?

Oops sorry double post.

Please delete my prev post. Thanks

Sorry!!!
edit on 17-3-2013 by dodol because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 07:26 AM
link   
Those that believe in 'me' shall never die.
What is this 'me'?

'Me' is an idea in time. Time is an idea that appears presently.
Presence is all there is.
Where are you in any of this?

You cannot exist without the idea of time so you are also an idea.
Has the presence ever gone anywhere?



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 08:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain

Originally posted by Kurius
reply to post by Itisnowagain
 

It could be genius...or pure evil.
Most seem to [like to] believe the former or something positive. It's always the ego thing...how can we ever be slaves to anything less than love, compassion, brilliance? But there's just possibility that it's all illusion. Like chickens thinking that they are raised because they deserve the feed. When the time comes, they are all harvested.

Watch this short video to see that there is no separate you existing.
youtu.be...
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)


Thanks for the link. Parsons begins his theory from existence; it's like watching "Gone with the Wind' starting from "Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn". He is basically trying to tell his audience everything is as it should be...there is nothing to see, to ask or to find just move along, live your life, get drunk. All there is is this. This is everything.

I would ask him to step back, rewind the movie and question how does "this" come into being? Why? Why couldn't it all come into non-being instead- ie. why couldn't "this" not exist? Who decides? Then how did this decision maker came into being? Why? Why couldn't this decision maker not exist? Then, who decides this decision maker to exist? And so on and so forth.
Hey, just maybe we are all in a loop like a concept of free energy. A trigger of one small energy feeds itself in a continuous cycle. The only way to stop existing is break the circuit? But how? ;P



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 08:37 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kurius

I would ask him to step back, rewind the movie and question how does "this" come into being? Why? Why couldn't it all come into non-being instead- ie. why couldn't "this" not exist? Who decides? Then how did this decision maker came into being? Why? Why couldn't this decision maker not exist? Then, who decides this decision maker to exist? And so on and so forth.
Hey, just maybe we are all in a loop like a concept of free energy. A trigger of one small energy feeds itself in a continuous cycle. The only way to stop existing is break the circuit? But how? ;P


Why, how and who are questions the seeker asks. The seeker asks questions because it feels incomplete.
Seeking is the action which makes a seeker. When the seeking drops away so does the seeker - the individual which appears to be separate from the whole.
There is only ever the whole but the seeking makes it appear that there is more to know, more to find. There isn't.
This is it. Here it is but the mind can never be satisfied with what is, it wants to know why.
No one knows how or why but it keeps the mind busy and it keeps you lost.

Concepts are abstractions away from the truth. The mind will hate what Tony Parsons speaks because it will be the end of it's control over you.
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 09:24 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain

Originally posted by Kurius

I would ask him to step back, rewind the movie and question how does "this" come into being? Why? Why couldn't it all come into non-being instead- ie. why couldn't "this" not exist? Who decides? Then how did this decision maker came into being? Why? Why couldn't this decision maker not exist? Then, who decides this decision maker to exist? And so on and so forth.
Hey, just maybe we are all in a loop like a concept of free energy. A trigger of one small energy feeds itself in a continuous cycle. The only way to stop existing is break the circuit? But how? ;P


Why, how and who are questions the seeker asks. The seeker asks questions because it feels incomplete.
Seeking is the action which makes a seeker. When the seeking drops away so does the seeker - the individual which appears to be separate from the whole.
There is only ever the whole but the seeking makes it appear that there is more to know, more to find. There isn't.
This is it. Here it is but the mind can never be satisfied with what is, it wants to know why.
No one knows how or why but it keeps the mind busy and it keeps you lost.

Concepts are abstractions away from the truth. The mind will hate what Tony Parsons speaks because it will be the end of it's control over you.
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)


Why would the seeker be deemed incomplete if he asks questions or the mind be judged lost if you should believe being curious and seeking must be part of 'what is'?
Nobody should hate what Parsons says. It is a perception and to believe in what he says or anything so dearly without the possibility of anything else is to allow that belief to control you and how you should be/think. Ironic, but true.



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 09:32 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kurius

Originally posted by Itisnowagain

Originally posted by Kurius

I would ask him to step back, rewind the movie and question how does "this" come into being? Why? Why couldn't it all come into non-being instead- ie. why couldn't "this" not exist? Who decides? Then how did this decision maker came into being? Why? Why couldn't this decision maker not exist? Then, who decides this decision maker to exist? And so on and so forth.
Hey, just maybe we are all in a loop like a concept of free energy. A trigger of one small energy feeds itself in a continuous cycle. The only way to stop existing is break the circuit? But how? ;P


Why, how and who are questions the seeker asks. The seeker asks questions because it feels incomplete.
Seeking is the action which makes a seeker. When the seeking drops away so does the seeker - the individual which appears to be separate from the whole.
There is only ever the whole but the seeking makes it appear that there is more to know, more to find. There isn't.
This is it. Here it is but the mind can never be satisfied with what is, it wants to know why.
No one knows how or why but it keeps the mind busy and it keeps you lost.

Concepts are abstractions away from the truth. The mind will hate what Tony Parsons speaks because it will be the end of it's control over you.
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)


Why would the seeker be deemed incomplete if he asks questions or the mind be judged lost if you should believe being curious and seeking must be part of 'what is'?
Nobody should hate what Parsons says. It is a perception and to believe in what he says or anything so dearly without the possibility of anything else is to allow that belief to control you and how you should be/think. Ironic, but true.


Do you feel complete? Individuals do not feel complete - they feel divided, as though there is something missing, something lacking so they seek to fulfil themselves. The feeling is very real.
The feeling is what life feels like for most, it feels awful.
That feeling will not go until you realize wholeness.

If you understood what Tony Parsons is saying you would lose 'your' life.
There is only aliveness - but you believe you 'have' a life. Which is two 'you' and 'life' - when the two become one the kingdom shall be revealed.



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 09:40 AM
link   
Have you ever visited bring4th forum www.bring4th.org... Seems its the only place on internet that´s fully dedicated to the study of the law of one. You could post your thread there too. What do you think of the RA Material? Would you say that its 100% accurate?
Thank you for your service



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 09:49 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
If you understood what Tony Parsons is saying you would lose 'your' life.
There is only aliveness - but you believe you 'have' a life. Which is two 'you' and 'life' - when the two become one the kingdom shall be revealed.


Interesting. Have you or Parsons lost 'your' lives? How does your feeling 'aliveness' differ from mine and how has that changed you personally? Do you feel you need to be? Can you exit from being?



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 09:54 AM
link   

Originally posted by Kurius

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
If you understood what Tony Parsons is saying you would lose 'your' life.
There is only aliveness - but you believe you 'have' a life. Which is two 'you' and 'life' - when the two become one the kingdom shall be revealed.


Interesting. Have you or Parsons lost 'your' lives? How does your feeling 'aliveness' differ from mine and how has that changed you personally? Do you feel you need to be? Can you exit from being?


Being is all there is.
Yes, Tony and I have both lost our individual lives. I am one with all that is - I am all that is - I am aliveness.
There is no worry or stress because I have no one to protect in the future - because one, there is no future and two, there is no me separate from what is happening.
The happening is happening presently as this and this is filling (whole).

The weight of carrying 'this life' you believe 'you have' is heavy - is it not?
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)

edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)



posted on Mar, 17 2013 @ 10:01 AM
link   

Originally posted by Itisnowagain

Originally posted by Kurius

Originally posted by Itisnowagain
If you understood what Tony Parsons is saying you would lose 'your' life.
There is only aliveness - but you believe you 'have' a life. Which is two 'you' and 'life' - when the two become one the kingdom shall be revealed.


Interesting. Have you or Parsons lost 'your' lives? How does your feeling 'aliveness' differ from mine and how has that changed you personally? Do you feel you need to be? Can you exit from being?


Being is all there is.
Yes, Tony and I have both lost our individual lives. I am one with all that is - I am all that is - I am aliveness.
There is no worry or stress because I have no one to protect in the future - because one, there is no future and two, there is no me separate from what is happening.
The happening is happening presently as this.

The weight of carrying 'this life' you believe 'you have' is heavy - is it not?
edit on 17-3-2013 by Itisnowagain because: (no reason given)


Curiously, our feelings of "aliveness" are rather similar. No, I don't feel the weight, no burden nor pressure. I just don't see the need for me to be, thus all the questions I had.




top topics



 
28
<< 6  7  8    10  11  12 >>

log in

join