It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by TauCetixeta
I think we may have found the antidote for the 2016 democrat ticket….
Rand/Cruz - Cruz/Rand or possibly Cruz/Rubio – Rubio/Cruz??
Hey, nobody knew Obama before the ‘anointed one’ took his throne. Cruz, Paul and Rubio are all making big waves and all have bigger national name recognition than Obama did in 2007.
Originally posted by indisputable
reply to post by TauCetixeta
I am not well versed in The us amendments... BUT with that aside i would like to know why is not one type of gun enough,and why not the most basic and simplistic of gun
Indisputable
Originally posted by indisputable
reply to post by TauCetixeta
I am not well versed in The us amendments... BUT with that aside i would like to know why is not one type of gun enough,and why not the most basic and simplistic of gun
Indisputable
Originally posted by SPECULUM
"Shall Not Be Infringed" is exactly what it means and has no other interpretation. However! is a direct threat to the government and all of their private membership and way of "lifestyle"
Shall not be infringed is the only real security for the constitution through its keepers IE: "WE THE PEOPLE"
Regardless of what any member of the government say's or implements on paper, it is irrelevant and has no authority that allows circumvention of "Shall Not Infringe" therefor making the executive body Enemies of the People and our right to defend against its threat of circumvention.
any gun law within each city, county or state has the ability to regulate.... The government has no authority Constitutionally and should focus more on regulating themselves of their trespasses on the people
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
I hope he lectures the progressives every week!
Originally posted by FyreByrd
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
I hope he lectures the progressives every week!
I didn't watch the video, I haven't read more then two or three posts.
I did, however, see the 'warning' from the MODS and have to agree.
My question is this: When a republican/tea party member, or other esteemed member of the right - won't answer a question - it's okay? But when Diane Feinstein does it (and she is not PROGRESSIVE only a Californian Democrate - the two are not synonymous) it's news?
It's just SOP (Standard Operating Proceedure) for ALL LEADERS - government and otherwise).
Real news on the front page please. Just what is ATS' definition of 'Breaking News'? I'll have to look it up. My responsibility.
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by macman
The emotion driven nonsense didn't work.
Senator Ted Cruz was expecting it. Answer the question senator!
Senator Ted Cruz.............................1
Senator Feinstein.............................0
Originally posted by bronto
What is ugly horror dog Feinteins advice to the swiss woman who was gang raped in India ? her husband was tied up, she was gang raped in front of him, they stole their money and mobile phone [sorry cant call the Police now] when the U.S dollar etc collapses and women have no way of protecting themselves ,imagine how many countless rapes and sexual assults will happen !!!! whats Feinstein going to say these victims .''There there dear ,its better to be raped ,stabbed or killed than own one of those awful guns !!! dont worry you will get better once the pencillin deals with the syphillis ,gonnorhea etc the rapist had ''