Operation Thunderdome: How The US Will Unravel. And Soon. (Important)

reply to post by 2gd2btru


The Globalist have a plan for you . It is called the NWO and Agenda 21 and you are not going to like it . This same bunch is driven by a written Constitution called the Protocols of Zion .They are for real !

www.biblebelievers.org...

Originally posted by coltcall
reply to post by 2gd2btru

 

As William Randolph Hearst said, "Lie to the people. They prefer it."

Although many people read the "Ulsterman Report" as if it is written by a 'Whitehouse Insider' it is a total fabrication on the level of the Daily Onion. This article traces the history of the group who writes under the name and their motivations.

Suppose it turns out that both Deep Throat and Ulsterman have engaged in fraud in order to play a joke on those who report and read the series of conversations supposedly cloaked in secrecy. Or, suppose the entire thing was made up in order to draw attention to and gain readers for 'News Flavor,' the online publication for which Ulsterman writes.

www.examiner.com...

Ulsterman Report seems to still hold power over a lot of fearful people. Push the fearful a little further down the road and you have created a tool for manipulation. Right leaning people that hold up the UR as authentic now appear radical as they spread the hoax further. Those who believe Ulsterman is real and persist in spreading this hoax after it has been revealed as such for two years have destroyed their own credibility. Yet many of the concerns they have are real, such as the push against the second amendment.

Love your Hearst quote.

Originally posted by vkey08
this same "operation" again? This has been discussed in other threads ad nauseaum..

Seeing these same types of posts over and over and OVER ridiculing honest discussion...

Suggests to me that this "theory" is most likely a FACT.

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by 2gd2btru

 

The Globalist have a plan for you . It is called the NWO and Agenda 21 and you are not going to like it . This same bunch is driven by a written Constitution called the Protocols of Zion .They are for real !

www.biblebelievers.org...

edit on 14-3-2013 by SimonPeter because: (no reason given)

The plan for my life has already been written by another. I trust He is sufficient. As for the Globalist, they are emperors with no clothes. It only takes one word of truth to reveal they are naked.

Your link didn't work.

reply to post by 2gd2btru

Originally posted by 2gd2btru
Why is fear controlling so many in our populace? And How do we address this type of all encompassing fear in a civil manner that doesn't include limiting freedoms? Fear is coming from all directions, right, left, center and off kilter.

Because FEAR is the opposite of FAITH...

Just in case you really DO want the answer to that question:

FEAR is opposite of FAITH

why does satan use fear

fear is the opposite of love

"After forty years of patient study of the crises which faces humanity, I arrived at a very simple conclusion-all conspiracies are Satanic! ~ Eustace Mullins

Originally posted by Murgatroid
reply to post by 2gd2btru

 

Originally posted by 2gd2btru
Why is fear controlling so many in our populace? And How do we address this type of all encompassing fear in a civil manner that doesn't include limiting freedoms? Fear is coming from all directions, right, left, center and off kilter.

Because FEAR is the opposite of FAITH...

Just in case you really DO want the answer to that question:

FEAR is opposite of FAITH

why does satan use fear

fear is the opposite of love

"After forty years of patient study of the crises which faces humanity, I arrived at a very simple conclusion-all conspiracies are Satanic! ~ Eustace Mullins

Exactly!

1 John 4:18 18 There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.

1 Peter 3:14-15 14 But even if you should suffer for what is right, you are blessed. Do not fear their threats; do not be frightened. 15 But in your hearts revere Christ as Lord. Always be prepared to give an answer to everyone who asks you to give the reason for the hope that you have. But do this with gentleness and respect,


Thank you for your answer. Above is mine. This is a day of blessing. Rejoice!

these threads are monitored. be careful what you say, and watch who you believe

Globalists are fallible.

From Alexander the Great to Adolph Hitler, drugs and booze did them in.

Now, is the OD-ing of a globalist a work from the Hand of God...or Karma...or some kind of balancing act to keep the world in one piece?

What if a globalist discovered the elixir of living two hundred years...and who killed Hugo Chavez, anyway? The Catholic Church, not what the new Pope is revealed to be Latin American? Could a globalist last two hundred years under all that pressure and competition from other globalists.

We have this system in America where our globalist presidents only get eight years max in office. Not that there is much difference between the Bush foreign policy from the Obama foreign policy.


The toxic soup probably helped to end the war early. In the early years Hitler did a good job of running the war both planning and allowing others to plan. Later he became less careful, refused to listen to others and made bad decisions that ultamatly led to his defeat and him taking his own life. I do not believe he would have won the war but he probably could have lasted 2 or 3 more years by continuing his war effort as he had started it

Read more: How did the fact that Hitler's blood was a toxic soup courtesy of his personal "physician" Dr. Morell affect Hitler's behaviour, and the war, or did it? I shall include in an answer a partial list of the chemicals Morell pumped into Hitler. | Answerbag www.answerbag.com...

reply to post by coltcall


My first thought after reading your post is a waking up to the news headlines, "George Soros chokes on his own Monsanto GMO veggies." It would be current proof that 'Globalists are fallible."

Originally posted by MONST3R
these threads are monitored. be careful what you say, and watch who you believe

Meh. There have been threads like this all over the internet for years and years and I've yet to hear of anyone suffering any sort of consequences from it.

Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by MRuss

 

A one world government simply is not possible. Its been tried numerous times and failed miserably. There are simply too many people with too many different values, religions, beliefs.......to all fit nicely under one set of rules and its impossible to enforce.

The Romans couldn't even keep their little part of the world under one rule before it started frailing at the edges and crumbled. Charlamagne couldn't do it, Napolean couldn't, Genghis Khan couldn't it, the Soviet Union couldn't, Britain couldn't.

The only way to control the world is secretly from the shadows where nobody knows you are doing it. Those with just even a smidgeon of historical knowledge know this.

That was then.. this is now. Charlemagne didn't have access to Echelon, did he? =) Moreover- the same bloodline from which the Bush dynasty hails is directly linked to Charlemagne.

So maybe he will have a global empire, after all? Brick by ' boring' brick, those living for 'today' will find themselves walled up soon enough.

I laugh at the notion that 'Rome' ever went anywhere. IT WENT EVERYWHERE.

Jeez. Us.

There's not going to be a "collapse", but rather a smooth transition. Kinda like the frogs in a pot of slowly boiled water. Those that are unable to adapt to the "change" will be outta luck. It's a dangerous situation, if you're American because the people have been rounded up, and pushed to the outer edges of the country; leaving the entire mid-west practically vacant and barren. Meaning, thousands and thousands, plus thousands of acres of land not producing anything. It's becoming easy to see how this slow death is being carried out by those that make the rules. These are the recipes for disaster:
1. We live in concrete jungles; packed on top of each other like sardines.
2. We depend on our jobs to: a. feed us, b. house us, and c. provide for our lavish lifestyles.
3. We have become lazy.
4. We believe someone owes us something.
5. We can't decipher the difference between right and wrong; truth and lies; fantasy and reality.
6. We have become totally dependent on a system built around slaves and masters.

Originally posted by Murgatroid
.....Suggests to me that this "theory" is most likely a FACT.

Here's a fact for you, there are people in this thread who staunchly defended GWB when similar scenarios were put forward during his presidency, but they have no problem with sticking the boot into Obama now.

Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by MRuss

 

A one world government simply is not possible. Its been tried numerous times and failed miserably. There are simply too many people with too many different values, religions, beliefs.......to all fit nicely under one set of rules and its impossible to enforce.

The Romans couldn't even keep their little part of the world under one rule before it started frailing at the edges and crumbled. Charlamagne couldn't do it, Napolean couldn't, Genghis Khan couldn't it, the Soviet Union couldn't, Britain couldn't.

The only way to control the world is secretly from the shadows where nobody knows you are doing it. Those with just even a smidgeon of historical knowledge know this.

The Chinese haven't done so badly over the centuries. A Long View and flexiblitiy.

Originally posted by neformore

Originally posted by Murgatroid
.....Suggests to me that this "theory" is most likely a FACT.

Here's a fact for you, there are people in this thread who staunchly defended GWB when similar scenarios were put forward during his presidency, but they have no problem with sticking the boot into Obama now.

Some of us knew he worked for the same demonized bosses and said so.

Nevertheless, in their use of the different parties in various good-cop/bad-cop games and charades

can you really blame folks for preferring the slower, more whitewashed road to Armageddon & hell vs the racecar route?

Originally posted by FyreByrd

The Chinese haven't done so badly over the centuries. A Long View and flexiblitiy.

The Chinese know there have been many cycles of honorable leadership then arrogance, tyranny, abusiveness, collapse . . . in a recurring cycle.

There was more brutality in history than egalitarianism . . . certainly true in China.

Nevertheless, even through and beyond the cultural revolution, the CULTURE retained a lot of distinctives. That's fascinating in itself.

Originally posted by FyreByrd

Originally posted by Hopechest
reply to post by MRuss

 

A one world government simply is not possible. Its been tried numerous times and failed miserably. There are simply too many people with too many different values, religions, beliefs.......to all fit nicely under one set of rules and its impossible to enforce.

The Romans couldn't even keep their little part of the world under one rule before it started frailing at the edges and crumbled. Charlamagne couldn't do it, Napolean couldn't, Genghis Khan couldn't it, the Soviet Union couldn't, Britain couldn't.

The only way to control the world is secretly from the shadows where nobody knows you are doing it. Those with just even a smidgeon of historical knowledge know this.

The Chinese haven't done so badly over the centuries. A Long View and flexiblitiy.

Well that, and Child Slave Labor. Conquer the next generation and you can rule the World.

Originally posted by 2gd2btru
reply to post by coltcall

 

My first thought after reading your post is a waking up to the news headlines, "George Soros chokes on his own Monsanto GMO veggies." It would be current proof that 'Globalists are fallible."

edit on 14-3-2013 by 2gd2btru because: spelling

These - theories, ever being remolded by a new 'convert' serve a very useful purpose in the so-called "Globalist Agenda" they - distract from useful thought and action.

As a starting point, say there are 7 billions human souls on the planet, if I have my math right, that makes for 70 miliion in the "1 %" and 700,000 in the top 100th of 1%. (As an aside, there is video making the rounds on wealth distribution in the USA right here on ATS). Next point, some globalist organition, Club of Rome, perhaps states that the carrying capacity of the planet is about 350 million. Third, if you remove all but 350 million souls from the planet (assuming!!!! that is a supportable number) it leaves you with only 280 million minions to bury the bodies, clean up the mess, cook THEIR food, guard THEIR homes, build THEIR toys, grow THEIR food, etc, etc.

Now I know that not all of the 70 million at the top end are stupid. They know this. There is reason behind actions (fear, greed, hate) and I think that THEY know their time is nearing an end and are playing a holding game.

Do I think things will be easy, smooth and peaceful - not so much; but I agree with the fellow with the Mr Spock avatar, that it really doesn't matter - it's just smoke and mirrors, bread and circuses. Empires rise, empires fail and it isn't going to stop just because I want it too. I'm not going to get my home back because THEY did it to me or my job because THEY did it to me. I can be angry all I want about republicans, democrates, commies, white people, black people, whoever; But, but it is a cowards defence against fear and nothing, nothing else.

Originally posted by MRuss
reply to post by Hopechest

 

Why?

Because they want to have a one world government.

A one world government would give its leaders control of the world, which they believe needs controlling. To them, it seems like an out of control, over populated mess, and if they can gain control of it, they can "fix" it, which merely means they seek control of the highest order.

It reduces you to slavery, in a sense, with little say. Your inherent right to freedom? Gone!

Now, if you want to have a one world government, what do you have to do?

You have to get rid of the most powerful country on earth.

How do you do that?

You undermine their economy, first off.

Then you take away their freedoms one at a time, while you're dumbing them down with flouride, a horrible education system, and info-tainment.

Then you take away their guns.

Voila!

They made it look easy, didn't they?

it's interesting because they would actually be right, we do need a one world government to control the resources and enact fair policies. I want a one world government and I think it's a natural progression of our species.
The problem is corruption and money are in the mix.

reply to post by Philodemus

Let say you convinced me and that all my skeptical tendencies have been thwarted by your presentation, my question is to you then, "What do I do now?"

This is one of the more practical responses to this thread. Firstly doomsday predictions are not new with plenty around and lots of circumstantial evidence to back them up, but we are still here. This is a complex and dangerous world through with many threats, risks and localized destruction depending on where you are in the world so it does pay to be prudent and aware. While having a large family does make it difficult, one thing you can do is relocate now before any road closures take place. There are lots of risks to consider with many environmental and political situations going on.

Another thing you can do is work out who you can trust should some SHTF event occur, what will you do if you have not had any communications for a few days then the army rocks up at your door? Will you go with them or fight it out? If society is to break down for some reason, will you fell safer in a FEMA camp or out in the streets?

Depending on what type of information you get in the lead up to the breakdown can alter the decisions you make and the survivability of your family. Preferably you do not want to be in a panic having never thought about it. Maybe it is some natural or unintended event that gets the ball rolling, in which case the military will be your friend. Maybe it is a political coup with a depopulation agenda in which case the military might be very dangerous.

If there is a science behind determining the threat

One scientific tool is performing a risk assessment. List out all the way thing could turn bad, how likely such a possibility is and how bad the impacts could be. From here it helps prioritize where further actions need to be done and what weak spots need to be covered. At a minimum, make sure you have plenty of water in reserve in case the taps do get turned of.