The Book of Revelation - Decoded in all it's Glory

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

So what is your point ? Are you saying you have not read the Protocols or you think that the Vatican is in charge of the NWO or the Banking systems of the world that is destroying the world ? There are good and bad Jews who endeavor to follow either God or Satan . Would you say Judas was a good or bad Jew ? I have not cursed the Jews I am for Israel and Gods people Jew or Gentile .

Im not saying any of that. What are the modern-day nations listed in Joel 3?

It's a simple post to follow.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


The Catholic church was mentioned as directly by Jesus Christ as it could be as the enemy of Christianity. . In Joel they are also talking about the same bunch .Egypt and Jordan are mentioned

reply to post by NOTurTypical


That cross beam formed the cross on the vertical post . There for a cross ! Didn't matter if the Romans hauled the cross beam up by rope or it was nailed hard to the vertical post .

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

The Catholic church was mentioned as directly by Jesus Christ as it could be as the enemy of Christianity. . In Joel they are also talking about the same bunch .Egypt and Jordan are mentioned

Egypt and Jordan are catholic??

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

That cross beam formed the cross on the vertical post .

Cool, so you agree with what I said earlier.

There for a cross !

I said that too. What are you arguing with? If you simply agree just give me a star or somethin.

Didn't matter if the Romans hauled the cross beam up by rope or it was nailed hard to the vertical post .

Again.. yeppers.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


I am not following you !?

Originally posted by SimonPeter
reply to post by NOTurTypical

 

I am not following you !?

Someone tried to claim that Jesus was not crucified, that He hung from a noose on a tree since in several passages it says He was hung on a tree. The other member either ignored or is ignorant to the fact that being "hung from a tree" was a slang vernacular for crucifixion, and that the vertical portion of the cross which the crossbeam was affixed to was a tree trunk.

reply to post by metalholic


As somebody who reveres Inanna (and a Kashshaptu), I can't decide how I feel about this. On one hand, I'm a bit amused at the clever way you twisted this but, on the other hand, I'm almost as put off as the Christians on this thread by making some of these associations.

I would suggest researching "Asherah" as the bride of Jesus instead. She was the original Goddess who ruled with the Jewish god before the big exile and reformation. Some say that Asherah is Inanna since they believe that Asherah is Ishtar (and Ishtar is Isis and Isis is Inanna... according to some) but you may as well look there first.

reply to post by Cuervo


Do you recall the story of Elijah on Mt. Carmel and the worshippers of Astheroth and Ba'al? YHWH pretty much settled that issue.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Cuervo

 

Do you recall the story of Elijah on Mt. Carmel and the worshippers of Astheroth and Ba'al? YHWH pretty much settled that issue.

edit on 13-3-2013 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)

Yeah... Yahweh threw a fireball at a vivisected bull and then Elijah murdered all of the priests. Not exactly what I would call "settled".

Asherah was once an accepted component to Jewish worship but when the patriarchal shift concluded (Elijah being a chief champion of that agenda), nearly all references to her were destroyed and many of her priests were slaughtered. Remember, those people Elijah murdered were also Jews. Just ones who didn't agree with Elijah.

Originally posted by Cuervo
reply to post by metalholic

 

As somebody who reveres Inanna (and a Kashshaptu), I can't decide how I feel about this. On one hand, I'm a bit amused at the clever way you twisted this but, on the other hand, I'm almost as put off as the Christians on this thread by making some of these associations.

I would suggest researching "Asherah" as the bride of Jesus instead. She was the original Goddess who ruled with the Jewish god before the big exile and reformation. Some say that Asherah is Inanna since they believe that Asherah is Ishtar (and Ishtar is Isis and Isis is Inanna... according to some) but you may as well look there first.

It's simple Jesus is the masculine side of witch craft and Inanna is the feminine side.

If he walks then she walks. They are man in wife as the dragon and whore of babylon.

All gods masculine can be accepted as marduk and all feminine gods can be accepted as Inanna.

They are 2 halves to one mind. One universe.

I know these things because I'am a warlock.

Originally posted by Cuervo

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Cuervo

 

Do you recall the story of Elijah on Mt. Carmel and the worshippers of Astheroth and Ba'al? YHWH pretty much settled that issue.

edit on 13-3-2013 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)

Yeah... Yahweh threw a fireball at a vivisected bull and then Elijah murdered all of the priests. Not exactly what I would call "settled".

Asherah was once an accepted component to Jewish worship but when the patriarchal shift concluded (Elijah being a chief champion of that agenda), nearly all references to her were destroyed and many of her priests were slaughtered. Remember, those people Elijah murdered were also Jews. Just ones who didn't agree with Elijah.

Go back several hours. Like all the hours the prophets and priestesses did everything in the book to get Ba'al or Ashteroth to do the same thing.

Nothing whatsoever happened.

Originally posted by NOTurTypical

Originally posted by Cuervo

Originally posted by NOTurTypical
reply to post by Cuervo

 

Do you recall the story of Elijah on Mt. Carmel and the worshippers of Astheroth and Ba'al? YHWH pretty much settled that issue.

edit on 13-3-2013 by NOTurTypical because: (no reason given)

Yeah... Yahweh threw a fireball at a vivisected bull and then Elijah murdered all of the priests. Not exactly what I would call "settled".

Asherah was once an accepted component to Jewish worship but when the patriarchal shift concluded (Elijah being a chief champion of that agenda), nearly all references to her were destroyed and many of her priests were slaughtered. Remember, those people Elijah murdered were also Jews. Just ones who didn't agree with Elijah.

Go back several hours. Like all the hours the prophets and priestesses did everything in the book to get Ba'al or Ashteroth to do the same thing.

Nothing whatsoever happened.

No, I get that. Somehow, Elijah felt that bovine incineration was proof of divine superiority. And, in his eyes, if you were not superior, you must be executed. When I read the Christian bible, I do so as if it were real because that is what they do. Even when I do that, however, I cannot begin to justify the many things that the followers of the OT god did nor does it reconcile the elimination of many of their own beliefs at the whim of a debated prophet.

In your bible, I see Jews, Christians, and enemies of both. Sadly, I feel many of those enemies won when they should have lost and ended up influencing your religion in strange ways. Much like Muhammad changed your religion much later only that time it was Muslims exiling Christians and Jews instead of just Jews exiling Jews.

I hold no issues with Christians (you probably have seen me defending your faith a few times) but I don't see things in your religion with a baptized eye. As far as the theory in the OP is concerned, I think you agree with it about as much as I do. It is interesting to imagine, though.

reply to post by Cuervo


Imagine disobedient children who can't understand what a scientist is trying to say because they only understand at the best 3rd grade intelligence. That's why so much of the ot is hard to relate to and justify though I just made it possible.

What is an un told truth about it is. The OT is actually pre modern human era's.

Adam and Eve were pre cro magnon man. To put it more in perspective.

reply to post by NOTurTypical

If you read the Greek word for what Christ carried to Golgatha you'd see that it was the crossbeam that was carried there.

No, it doesn't.
It uses the exact same word used everywhere else in the New Testament for "cross".
The Greek word doesn't mean specifically a 'cross'.
"Cross" in English comes from the Latin.
There is a Greek word that came to be used to refer specifically to the crossbeam but it is never used in the New Testament.
I think for purposes of theology, it might be best in my opinion to just think that the NT means a cross, whenever you see "cross" in your English translations, since this how Christians have believed since day one.
To go on topic, the thread is on the Book of Revelation.
This tangent seems to have taken off from a discussion on Rev. 11:8.
Jesus said, according to the Gospel, that it was impossible for a prophet to be killed outside of Jerusalem.
It could be that the revelator is here expanding out the definition of what is inside or outside of "Jerusalem", for the sake of understanding prophetically, that "Jerusalem" can mean something beyond just a geographical location, and can have a wider metaphorical meaning to include the places where the Gospel is being preached in the Empire but hated by those who choose not to believe.

You've been blinded by your magick which has been given to you by demons. These demons want nothing more than to see Jesus erased from history and religion in order to save themselves and you fell into their trap. Now they only want to see you fall with them, thinking this somehow leads to a victory for them. The Bible warned us of such things. Their victory is your loss as well as their own, but they're too prideful to admit it.

Originally posted by stupid girl
reply to post by JesuitGarlic

 

The number must be calculated in Greek, not Latin. Translate the name to Greek, then calculate.

Why must the number be calculated in Greek?

There are multiple minor titles of the pope in Hebrew, Latin and Greek that add up to 666. The official title though is the one that I gave which is in Latin. I don't see what the issue is with using roman numerals from the latin words.

reply to post by NOTurTypical


The Jehovah Witness tends to imply that Jesus was crucified on a stake . They evidently do not know the particulars of Crucifixion and how it kills and how breaking the legs speeds up the process . Then the Muslims with all of their religions legitimacy hinging on their claim that Jesus [ chickened out ] and did not die for us on the cross . I guess he survived the terrible scourging to the point that his bowels were protruding without antibiotics from a scourge that had not been disinfected from the last victim , still whipped along the way, nailed to a cross in 4 places on his body with 3 rusty nails for 6 hours then speared through his diaphram , heart and heart then married Marry Magdalene and lived to be 54 . NOT!
I'm just an old wretched sinner and that unholy crap makes me sick . Think what it does to Jesus .

On a subject that turns off so many . I finally to a fair look at the Protocols of Zion and was truly astounded at the unparalleled accuracy of every facet of the worlds situation today and the diciplined efforts that the Protocols set in motion a very long time ago . These Protocols were exposed to the world in 1897 but are believed to be much older ,possibly the 1650s but kept close to the vest by the conspiritors . Another thing I found is a 1969 exposing of the NWO plot for America .

rense.com/general84/d2on.htm

reply to post by metalholic

It's simple Jesus is the masculine side of witch craft and Inanna is the feminine side.

So why then is witchcraft made redundant when someone calls on the name of Jesus to counteract witchcraft?

All gods masculine can be accepted as marduk and all feminine gods can be accepted as Inanna.

What you really mean to say is that all masculine made up deities by the humans Nimrod and his prostitute wife Semiramis can be accepted as Marduk (because Marduk is the first one they made up), while all feminine made up deities can be accepted as Inanna (or Astrate).

If your theory about Jesus was actually true then you would have to explain how He, in His pre-incarnate form, made a complete fool out of the masculine and feminine made up gods of Egypt with the 10 plagues over Egypt, then destroyed the reincarnated Osiris, the Pharaoh himself (Thutmose III, the most powerful Pharaoh of all time and writer of the Book of the Dead), in the Red Sea.



That would be the Egyptian army at the bottom of the Red Sea spread across the length of the crossing location.

Video: The spade unearths the truth

the vid shows the priests of Horus depicted in Thutmose III tombs throwing their rods and them turning into serpents. It has the changed body of Thutmose III tomb examined and show that the body they replaced him with is a good 30 years younger than what his actual age at death was. It shows through bible chronology that the date of the exodus and the date Thutmose III died as recorded by his scribe was the same date. It has evidence to suggest that the Pharaoh''s first born son was killed in the tenth plague, which is why the second born son became the next Pharaoh (which was not his right to do so).

I know these things because I'am a warlock.

To me, it sounds like all your warlock training is a big waste of time....as it conflicts with truths which tend to be more solid

reply to post by Cuervo


Ancient Israel incorporated Ashera worship subsequent to the clearly defined establishment of their religious beliefs at Sinai.
The major point of contention of the God of Israel, was their proclivity to assimilate the beliefs of cultures around them. The Bible is explicit in the fact that the religious practices of those cultures, namely the Philistine, Canaanite, Assyrian & Babylonian, were abominations to the God of Israel.
As the Nation of Israel progressed, it went against the express admonition of their God to not be influenced by, associate with or imitate the religious practices of those around them.

Initially, Israel also went against their instructions to utterly annihilate those living in the area in which they were to establish their nation. Not only was this common practice by all cultures, but it was also a preemptive effort to keep Israel from the gradual perversion of their newly established practices of faith.

Goddess worship had no place in the faith of Israel established at Sinai. As God likened His endeavor with this Nation as "husbandry" of a peoples, He also deemed their incorporation of other beliefs as "prostitution" and "whoring". The basis of those surrounding beliefs being founded in grossly inferior entities than the Most High God of Israel, He went so far as to literally accuse them of "spreading their legs to all those who passed by".

The ultimate destruction of the once, but brief, greatest nation on the planet, revered by all others, was primarily due to Israel's apostasy into spiritual skank-dom.

Elijah, as one of the greatest prophets of the Most High God, lived his life accordingly. Your perspective of him is skewed since the basis of your faith is in the sworn enemy of the Most High God that Elijah served. Where you see injustice, those Who serve the Almighty see righteous retribution.