It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by seabag
Where was a candidate who stood a shot that offered us different. Was Romney going to anything different about the NDAA, ACTA all those other things you listed? No.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by seabag
I did vote for Johnson... good lord.
Where was a candidate who stood a shot that offered us different. Was Romney going to anything different about the NDAA, ACTA all those other things you listed? No.
H. Ross Perot sunk that ship when he had all of the momentum and chose to drop out of the race because the CIA was threatening his daughters cat - at least I think that was what he claimed.
Originally posted by Kali74
reply to post by seabag
Because Johnson didn't have a shot. No corporate backing no corporate media coverage.
In other words you're more interested in any point that makes you feel you're in the right?
Instead of engaging in conversation you want to stick out your tongue and say I told you so? "Anybody but Obama" is quite a foolish if not dangerous mentality to have.
The hatred by the right, FOX, Alex Jones, & The NRA is all the proof I need
that he's giving it his best although realistic shot.
It would be wonderful if he could actually
implement a plan or two but obstruction is tougher than any president since
Lincoln has had to endure.
Originally posted by jimmiec
The Republican House has sent plenty of Bills to the Senate to put on the floor for discussion. Budgets, etc. Harry Reid will not even present them to the Senate. It is the Democrats that refuse to even talk about compromise for the sake of the people. We are literally living under a dictatorship.
Nonsense!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! You are living in the bubble.
Today, Senate Republicans are pushing legislation that would hand Obama a scalpel rather than a meat cleaver. The Toomey-Inhofe alternative would give the president discretion to allocate the sequester’s cut largely as he sees fit.
WaPo
The bottom line is that Republican bill makes the sequester easier to live with, and the White House doesn’t want the sequester to be easier to live with.
Originally posted by sealing
I know your discouraged but I place most of the blame where it belongs. The insane Tea Party & FOx "News" and AM radio shock jocks.
I still think your pretty cool.
It's the "backers" of the Tea Party et al who hold the reins.