Iran new P5+1deal, give up your 20% Enriched Uranium

reply to post by Manhandler12
lets see try to explain this one oilprice.com... from the link

All intelligence indicators received and processed by GIS/Defense & Foreign Affairs show that the nuclear weapon tested by the Democratic People’s Republic of Korea (DPRK: North Korea) on February 12, 2013, was paid for, and intended for, the Islamic Republic of Iran. It was, in essence, a test of an Iranian nuclear weapon, and involved scientific as well as financial involvement by the Iranian Government. Moreover, the weapon was not — as some media reporting has averred — a “step toward” a North Korean or Iranian nuclear weapons capability: it was in fact a demonstration of a common DPRK and Iranian operationally-ready nuclear weapon.

Just as DPRK officials indicated long before the first North Korean nuclear weapons demonstration on October 9, 2006, that the DPRK had effectively tested its weapons and proven their design in the May 1998 Chagai-I series of tests by Pakistan, so the DPRK tests — particularly the February 12, 2013, test, were to prove Iranian weapon design efficacy. However, given the commonality of the payload “nipple” on the Iranian and DPRK missiles, it seems likely that the nuclear weapon design tested would be the baseline system for both countries.

then add in the Iran Pakistan deal, this is becoming to be really interesting really fast.

reply to post by bekod


Or that entire quote was made up nonsense for the western propaganda machine. Remember Iraq's WMDs. If you believe that the west have spies that can monitor the accounts division of top secret projects for Iran and NK, give it a break!

This is western propaganda.

P