It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Aleister
Robert McNamara and Lyndon Johnson both admitted that the Vietnam War protesters were right. When is someone going to build a monument to anti-war activists? And why Rumsfeld and his commander in chief aren't standing trial someplace is it's own kind of monument - to unfairness and "letting bygones be bygones".
Most importantly, it needs to be realised that both the Republicans and Democrats have made these decision and that neither party can claim any kind of moral superiority over the other, at all. The blood shed really is on everyone's hands
Originally posted by daveinats
Well, I don't know about you 'armchair quarterbacks', but there were WMD there. And they were used against us.
Most of the liberal morons only consider nuclear items as WDM, but there are much worst things.
Chemical and biological weapons, which Sadam did have, and were whisked away to Syria by the Russians, are much worse.
“The main obstacle to a stable and just world order is the United States.”—George Soros
Is it possible to lay the global financial meltdown, the radicalizing of the Democratic Party, and America’s moral decline, at the feet of one man?
It is indeed possible.
If George Soros isn’t the world’s preeminent “malignant messianic narcissist,” he’ll do until the real thing comes along. Move over, Hitler, Stalin, Mao, and Pol Pot. There’s a new kid on the block.
What we have in Soros, is a multi-billionaire atheist, with skewed moral values, and a sociopath’s lack of conscience. He considers himself to be a world class philosopher, despises capitalism, and just loves social engineering.
In 1944 Hitler’s henchman Adolf Eichmann arrived in Hungary, to oversee the murder of that country’s Jews. The Soros children were all given fake identity papers, and were shipped out to various Christian families. George Soros ended up with a man whose job was confiscating property from the Jewish population. Soros went with him on his rounds.
France has upheld an earlier conviction against Soros, for felony insider trading. Soros was fined 2.9 million dollars. (Source)
Recently, his native Hungary fined Soros 2.2 million dollars for “illegal market manipulation.” Elizabeth Crum writes that “The Hungarian economy has been in a state of transition as the country seeks to become more financially stable and westernized. [Soros’] deliberately driving down the share price of its largest bank put Hungary’s economy into a wicked tailspin, one from which it is still trying to recover.” (Source)
Originally posted by purplemer
reply to post by TrueAmerican
I do not really get it. If there is real proof of such a large cover up the politicians that instigated the war should be up on charges on mass murder... It is a massive failure of government..
The total cleansing sounds like a very good idea to me
Originally posted by mbkennel
Originally posted by daveinats
Well, I don't know about you 'armchair quarterbacks', but there were WMD there. And they were used against us.
Well, then, they weren't very GOOD weapons of mass destruction, now were they?
Most of the liberal morons only consider nuclear items as WDM, but there are much worst things.
No there aren't. At most Saddam had tiny remnants of chemical weapons, which are not actually WMD's. You need delivery systems of conventional military sorts, like aircraft and artillery. And if you have indiscriminate ability to deliver chemical WMD's, you could just as easily drop cluster bombs, which are at least as destructive.
Biological weapons, in theory, might be actual WMD's, but it's never been proven that they can actually work successfully and there are serious barriers (as in biology wants to do what biology wants). It's very unlikely Iraq had anywhere near any serious capability; probably only the USSR did.
Chemical and biological weapons, which Sadam did have, and were whisked away to Syria by the Russians, are much worse.
Not in the slightest. The supposed chemical weaponry did almost nothing militarily---suppose Saddam instead had 25 nuclear warheads on his missiles (actual WMD) and actually used them?
edit on 20-2-2013 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by kthxbai
The total cleansing sounds like a very good idea to me
Don't forget to add some of the current Marxists/Socialist/Globalist/narcissist/Communist leaders to the list.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
reply to post by kthxbai
The total cleansing sounds like a very good idea to me
Don't forget to add some of the current Marxists/Socialist/Globalist/narcissist/Communist leaders to the list.
Originally posted by CT_Flyboy
Why haven't these 3 stooges (Bush, Cheney & DUMBsfeld) been charged with war crimes?
Originally posted by okamitengu
the real surprise to me was that anyone actually believed it in the first place.
seriously, they suddenly start throwing around the word iraq straight after 911... they were gunning for a showdown
reply to post by TrueAmerican
They are scheming, secretive, lying SOBs, who will toss Amerikan blood on battlefields and not even think about it. They really DO NOT CARE anymore about the soldier's lives, or the family's lives who are so affected by this- much less the children and other innocents who bear the brunt of their lasting destruction with depleted uranium.