Meteorite Crashes in Russia

reply to post by zoomer72

ok Phage so you tell us how the buildings roof collapsed like that because of sonic boom? im eager to see?

I've told you. Several times.
Weak points in the structure.

Now you tell us, what caused those other partial failures you've been shown? Falling meteors?

A large chunk... Heats up, cracks in twain. Still together-ish. 1 Boom. 2 smoke trails.

Those 2 chunks then split further until they are small enough to completely explode as smaller bolides, creates even more separate multiple booms.
Same event, multiple smoke trails, multiple booms. Perfectly normal, but somewhat rare event, although these events will SEEM to increase over the next 100 years, but this is purely because capturing the events will become commonplace with the proliferation of camera tech.

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by theabsolutetruth

 

two almost symmetrical contrails

I don't see that.

Here is the close up picture again.



If this is the same event, it is a statistical anomaly.

If it isn't, then it is the reporting that is questionable.

www.wunderground.com...


2nd picture on the site is another view of the zinc factory.

Looks like structural failure under major stress to me.

reply to post by theabsolutetruth

Look at the whole length of the trail. The photographer pans it. It starts as a single trail, splits, then rejoins.
There are no two "identical" trails. Yes at one point there are parallel trails but that is what you would expect from a single object producing two trails, isn't it?

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by zoomer72

 

Hey m8 all i say is shockwave doesnt do a hole in a ceiling

Was it falling objects which caused those other partial failures you've been shown?

i really dont know, but dont think so, anyways i dont see what those have to do with this Russian case? not the same buildings etc...? you have not shown anything relating to this?

reply to post by eriktheawful




Correct me if I'm wrong....we never experienced an exploding asteroid before. But...I know the difference in the common celestial bodies (even though a certain member pegs me as a full fledged moron).
More or less: meteors are alive. Asteroids are dead. Meteors whiz through the cosmos. Asteroids saunter. But now comets.....they're just dirty snowballs, right

But, whose to say what it is we saw today? Sure, it looked like a 'regular' meteor and it impacted like a normal meteorite. But could it have been remnants of an asteroid? I say...why not?

reply to post by zoomer72

i really dont know,

You could have stopped right there.
You said a roof cannot partially fail. You are wrong.

big thread! unsure if this was posted already, shows a couple of videos, one showing some building damage etc

www.space.com...

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by zoomer72

 

i really dont know,

You could have stopped right there.
You said a roof cannot partially fail. You are wrong.

what the hell are you talking about? i think you should read back on the thread friend...
Since i dont know what caused the damage seen in those pictures that arent from todays event, what ive seen that happened today at the zinck factory the damage (my opinion) was because of the debree. of that rock

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by theabsolutetruth

 

Look at the whole length of the trail. The photographer pans it. It starts as a single trail, splits, then rejoins.
There are no two "identical" trails. Yes at one point there are parallel trails but that is what you would expect from a single object producing two trails, isn't it?

edit on 2/15/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)

Such exactitude isn't expected especially on a natural phenomena, it would require exactly the same burning and vapourisation rates on objects of the same mass and shape, this is the statistical anomaly.

aliens did it!

I couldn't read all those 190 pages.....BUT DID YOU SEE that sumavich coming inbound from out there....lighting up and punching right the hay back out there....what a fire ball....the reason for the twin trails must be the huge size....not the usual sonicboom, a super blast, really.....like...take that....
lucky he had that video going....the one on the first page or so...

reply to post by Human_Alien

Correct me if I'm wrong....we never experienced an exploding asteroid before.

You are wrong.

Here's a smaller one last year.
www.space.com...

Here's a really big one in 1947. Much larger than the one today.
en.wikipedia.org...

More or less: meteors are alive. Asteroids are dead. Meteors whiz through the cosmos.

A meteor is an object (asteroid, grain of sand) which enters the Earth's atmosphere and becomes visible as it vaporizes.

reply to post by theabsolutetruth

I guess I just don't agree on the "exactitude".

Originally posted by Human_Alien
reply to post by eriktheawful

 

Correct me if I'm wrong....we never experienced an exploding asteroid before. But...I know the difference in the common celestial bodies (even though a certain member pegs me as a full fledged moron).
More or less: meteors are alive. Asteroids are dead. Meteors whiz through the cosmos. Asteroids saunter. But now comets.....they're just dirty snowballs, right

But, whose to say what it is we saw today? Sure, it looked like a 'regular' meteor and it impacted like a normal meteorite. But could it have been remnants of an asteroid? I say...why not?

Oh no HA, .......if it was a piece of an asteroid, the moment it broke off it became a Meteoroid. Asteroids are called such as they are much bigger, measuring miles in diameters.
Meteoroids on the other hand are much smaller.

As for a asteroid exploding? Well I don't think we've ever been lucky to see one doing it (I would assume it would have to be from an impact with another object).

But be very glad that what hit Russia today was a Meteoroid and not a Asteroid......If it had been an Asteroid....I don't think we would have gotten to see all those videos and pics.......There would have been no one alive.......

Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by Human_Alien

 

Correct me if I'm wrong....we never experienced an exploding asteroid before.

You are wrong.

Here's a smaller one last year.
www.space.com...

Here's a really big one in 1947. Much larger than the one today.
en.wikipedia.org...

that first one does not appear to have achieved anything like the effect that this new one achieved

reply to post by Credenceskynyrd

Yes. As I said. It was a smaller one.

Originally posted by sam_inc
aliens did it!

Tell Captain Bill I'd be much more impressed if they had given a warning days in advanced, including the Russian city that it flew over.....and then had seen events today.

But as always......they wait until something happens, THEN make the claims....

but of course they did.....

Originally posted by eriktheawful

Originally posted by theabsolutetruth
reply to post by eriktheawful

 

]

First, those contrails streamed off of the meteor at around 18,000 mph. The were in no way shape or form fluffy, etc. They were like water shooting from a fire hose.

Take a look at a jet in the sky when it's contrails are streaming behind it.

Afterwards, you have 2 trails of billowing smoke that have now slowed, side by side. Same air currents. Same air density, Same air temperature.

I would be very suspicious if they did not have similiar characteristics.

But even so, given convection of currents, the particles making up that smoke trails in the end are still not exactly identical.

Thanks. That is an awesome explanation I think you broke it down to where everyone can understand it. It makes perfect sense to me anyway.