It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by KyrieEleison
reply to post by ajay59
When something happens in a court room or via interaction with the police, there is a public record of it somewhere. Case files, police reports ... something.
When all this anecdotal stuff is posted claiming things, things that would be a matter of public record, really happened yet somehow have no documentation of any kind to back it up is being unreasonable.
Your burden of proof is incredibly easy to unload, yet there it is.
Originally posted by ajay59
Originally posted by KyrieEleison
reply to post by ajay59
When something happens in a court room or via interaction with the police, there is a public record of it somewhere. Case files, police reports ... something.
When all this anecdotal stuff is posted claiming things, things that would be a matter of public record, really happened yet somehow have no documentation of any kind to back it up is being unreasonable.
Your burden of proof is incredibly easy to unload, yet there it is.
Do you honestly expect intelligent people here to believe that the corrupt system is going expose it's self by leaving a paper trail leading to the truth that they have been wronging the masses for centuries? Does this make sense to anyone?
The unbalance to which I refer is like Capone saying, "don't listen to all those witnesses, we didn't kill anybody"! Not to mention the fact that the "charge" is being led by an admitted agent of the corrupt system.
But all of us have stated, if we can see a victory, we would gladly state we were wrong.. So far anyone asked comes up with excuses as to why these supposed victories in court cannot be sourced? Leaving that part out is just character assassination, and I'm not going to sit by and let you do that.
Originally posted by ajay59
reply to post by vkey08
But all of us have stated, if we can see a victory, we would gladly state we were wrong.. So far anyone asked comes up with excuses as to why these supposed victories in court cannot be sourced? Leaving that part out is just character assassination, and I'm not going to sit by and let you do that.
Do you recon it could be because the corrupt do not wish to have tangible evidence proving their crimes available to all? Really, can this be a plausibility? As for character assassination, is that not what all of you have been doing all through the entire topic on every thread? I mean really, labeling something to be a hoax or scam and then attempting to prove it to be so after the fact?
Originally posted by vkey08
Anything that claims that you can make a difference by simply making up a paper with a bunch of fancy looking words on it because it's some strange loophole in a commercial code, is not remembering what made this country great to begin with, the hard work and perseverance of our forefathers.