It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
hmmmm, last i checked that 'code' is the same UCC everyone is talking about, eh ??
Depends on what kinds of contracts you are talking about, business to business, and person to business, yes and those are governed by a code
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by HIWATT
If it's been established by the owners of this site that this topic is forbidden now, then it should apply to both sides of the coin.
No. The intent of the ban was to prevent ATS from lending material support to a criminal enterprise.
Originally posted by Crakeur Recently, this site started seeing posts regarding The One People’s Public Trust (TOPPT). After one lengthy discussion, located here, the owners and administrators of ATS have decided to close down any future discussion on the topic as it was deemed to be nothing more than a new age scam.
Originally posted by fourthmeal
See, you can't do that. You can't disallow a topic and ban it from discussion on ATS, and then write up a thread demonizing them.
Let the information come out. It is coming. Let the chips fall where they may. Once all the information is out, THEN you can make informed decisions.
I'm firm on what I believe and know, the I AM that is me sees right through what is happening on this forum. And, let me add, taking folks who are in favor of OPPT and then pulling their comments off for whatever reason is only solidifying the unfair stance ATS is putting on this. This is all unprecendented, and all very new age. But new age doesn't mean wrong. Everything is new, everything deserves to be fleshed out and observed for what it is.
BTW, the "What the FUQ" movie that covers the Australian government issue with a similar solution the OPPT took, is out and available for view. Perhaps watching the story of that will give more light to this complex situation.
I told you I will be dark on the subject until more info comes out, but for the love of Pete and fairness, why create demonizing threads when we are all told to NOT discuss it? Come on!
Originally posted by HIWATT
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by HIWATT
If it's been established by the owners of this site that this topic is forbidden now, then it should apply to both sides of the coin.
No. The intent of the ban was to prevent ATS from lending material support to a criminal enterprise.
Really?
Originally posted by Crakeur Recently, this site started seeing posts regarding The One People’s Public Trust (TOPPT). After one lengthy discussion, located here, the owners and administrators of ATS have decided to close down any future discussion on the topic as it was deemed to be nothing more than a new age scam.
ANY FUTURE DISCUSSION
Not my words. Crakeurs.
The fact that this thread has been allowed to stand, despite clear direction by the owners here, is evidence to everyone reading how duplicitous and hypocritical ATS really is.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by HIWATT
Originally posted by DJW001
reply to post by HIWATT
If it's been established by the owners of this site that this topic is forbidden now, then it should apply to both sides of the coin.
No. The intent of the ban was to prevent ATS from lending material support to a criminal enterprise.
Really?
Originally posted by Crakeur Recently, this site started seeing posts regarding The One People’s Public Trust (TOPPT). After one lengthy discussion, located here, the owners and administrators of ATS have decided to close down any future discussion on the topic as it was deemed to be nothing more than a new age scam.
ANY FUTURE DISCUSSION
Not my words. Crakeurs.
The fact that this thread has been allowed to stand, despite clear direction by the owners here, is evidence to everyone reading how duplicitous and hypocritical ATS really is.
You're picking and choosing to fit your complaint. This was clarified shortly after, saying that threads promoting it will be put in the hoax bin, where it belongs.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by fourthmeal
See, you can't do that. You can't disallow a topic and ban it from discussion on ATS, and then write up a thread demonizing them.
Let the information come out. It is coming. Let the chips fall where they may. Once all the information is out, THEN you can make informed decisions.
I'm firm on what I believe and know, the I AM that is me sees right through what is happening on this forum. And, let me add, taking folks who are in favor of OPPT and then pulling their comments off for whatever reason is only solidifying the unfair stance ATS is putting on this. This is all unprecendented, and all very new age. But new age doesn't mean wrong. Everything is new, everything deserves to be fleshed out and observed for what it is.
BTW, the "What the FUQ" movie that covers the Australian government issue with a similar solution the OPPT took, is out and available for view. Perhaps watching the story of that will give more light to this complex situation.
I told you I will be dark on the subject until more info comes out, but for the love of Pete and fairness, why create demonizing threads when we are all told to NOT discuss it? Come on!
You're not required to like what rules they set forth, but if you want to continue to use these forums, I'd follow their rules if I were you.
Originally posted by flyswatter
Originally posted by fourthmeal
See, you can't do that. You can't disallow a topic and ban it from discussion on ATS, and then write up a thread demonizing them.
Let the information come out. It is coming. Let the chips fall where they may. Once all the information is out, THEN you can make informed decisions.
I'm firm on what I believe and know, the I AM that is me sees right through what is happening on this forum. And, let me add, taking folks who are in favor of OPPT and then pulling their comments off for whatever reason is only solidifying the unfair stance ATS is putting on this. This is all unprecendented, and all very new age. But new age doesn't mean wrong. Everything is new, everything deserves to be fleshed out and observed for what it is.
BTW, the "What the FUQ" movie that covers the Australian government issue with a similar solution the OPPT took, is out and available for view. Perhaps watching the story of that will give more light to this complex situation.
I told you I will be dark on the subject until more info comes out, but for the love of Pete and fairness, why create demonizing threads when we are all told to NOT discuss it? Come on!
The reasoning from the OP was given a few pages back, as was what a forum moderator and the site owner said on the subject. You're not required to like what rules they set forth, but if you want to continue to use these forums, I'd follow their rules if I were you.
The OPPT is a scam, and anything promoting the use of it by members here is nothing more than a promotion that will get people in trouble. Discussion of it is fine, promotion of it as legit is just stupid.
Originally posted by Honor93
reply to post by vkey08
hmmmm, last i checked that 'code' is the same UCC everyone is talking about, eh ??
Depends on what kinds of contracts you are talking about, business to business, and person to business, yes and those are governed by a code
so let me get this straight ... all people (Americans) are unvoluntarily subject to this New Deal 'contract' that supercedes our birth and exists in continuum so long as the US exists ??
so, if we are party to the first part, how can we not be party to second part ??
UCC exemption.
does the same code apply or not ?edit on 13-2-2013 by Honor93 because: format
I have knowingly, willingly and intentionally instructed all my agents, employees, work associates, and family who have come to me with a report that a [man/woman], whether [he/she] is impersonating a public officer or not, claiming to record their calls and then making threats of various future “actions” and spewing alphabets such as “FBI” to intimidate them to answer questions, I have instructed them to inform said [man/woman] and her accomplices, that they will happily return calls, consent to recordings, and comply with all official written requests from public officers, officials, or persons as soon as said officers, officials or persons provide verifiable proof and documentation as demanded in #1-38 below;