It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ImpactoR
reply to post by goou111
Just as I thought, the antenna is from the object taking the picture, even if projected over the surface, it didnt even look like coming from the surface. it's in the air
Originally posted by wolveriine
reply to post by Phage
Perhaps because there is no "shard" there
There is no shard there ? Let me help you with this
Watch this video posted earlier by our member
Originally posted by AuntieChrist
Unfortunately for your question, you can´t actually make the claim that I used that NASA photo to support any opinion which I may or may not have.
Also for the record; on my planet, NASA can NEVER be trusted, (except with their airbrush skills) although I am absolutely game for them to prove me wrong.
The "shard" can be seen on the horizon and there is a landmark in the picture with a known location.
Mare Orientale is labeled in the picture and it is located at:
LAT 19.4S
Long 92.8W
The "shard" can be seen on the horizon and there is a landmark in the picture with a known location.
Mare Orientale is labeled in the picture and it is located at:
LAT 19.4S
Long 92.8W
Sheesh. I linked the map here:
www.abovetopsecret.com...
I make the location of the "shard" to be at about 7ºW 3.5ºS.
I gave you the source for the high resolution LROC images.
Originally posted by AuntieChrist
..Apollo photo´s/scans = NASA photo/scans X (airbrush/editing) ´divided by´ (the truth + questionable agenda),
gives the overall total answer of,
NEED INDEPENDENT DATA!
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
The location needs to be discussed and input from other members if they have some useful information to this regard will be appreciated.
The "shard" can be seen on the horizon and there is a landmark in the picture with a known location.
Mare Orientale is labeled in the picture and it is located at:
LAT 19.4S
Long 92.8W
The coordinates of the location of the image are provided. Even those that believe the "shard" is an actual object agree on that. The two craters prominent in the full image are identifiable as Bruce and Brag. Those same two craters are identifiable at the upper right in the Apollo 16 image.
I make the location of the "shard" to be at about 7ºW 3.5ºS.
Please members show your opinions who do you agree Phage or Tardacus is correct and why?
Why do you think the image Tardacus is referring to is of the same "object" in the OP?
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by AuntieChrist
Is that the exact same area of our alleged Shard? Clearly no Shard but then again clearly no clarity with anything.
You can try this version:
apollo.sese.asu.edu...
Or use the viewer here. The clarity is substantially better than that of the image which contains the "shard". If it were there, it would be quite prominent. It isn't.
wms.lroc.asu.edu...
edit on 2/9/2013 by Phage because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by AthlonSavage
Anyone ever see that 70s space show space 1999, all the reruns episodes are on Youtube great show.
Great show?
Are you serious? The original BSG was better and it was horrible.
Originally posted by RoScoLaz
Originally posted by Phage
reply to post by AthlonSavage
Anyone ever see that 70s space show space 1999, all the reruns episodes are on Youtube great show.
Great show?
Are you serious? The original BSG was better and it was horrible.
oh come on it had a certain charm. i remember one of the alien monsters was pretty much a man-eating carpet. terrible 'special' effects but it was pre CGI. it has a nostalgic appeal if nothing else. and Martin Landau.
Originally posted by AthlonSavage
Do members agrees with Phage or Tardacus????