It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by LeftBehind
What kind of REAL INVESTIGATION would satisfy you if the conclusion was that no bombs were used?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
C*******F*****"s
?
What ?
Originally posted by LeftBehind
Originally posted by quicknthedead
What gets me is how they can be so dead-set against a REAL INVESTIGATION OF 9/11 in the light of all this information.
In some circles, the NIST investigation is considered a REAL INVESTIGATION.
Since your mind is made up, would any investigation that disproved bombs or thermite or government involvement satisfy you?
Or by REAL INVESTIGATION do you mean one that supports demolition theories?
What kind of REAL INVESTIGATION would satisfy you if the conclusion was that no bombs were used?
Engineers are not bound by any commitment to not point each other's bad science out...I assure you.
Originally posted by quicknthedead
Then Dr. Sunder paused. “But truthfully, I don’t really know. We’ve had trouble getting a handle on building No. 7.”
Originally posted by Valhall
billybob,
Just to dispell an "urban legend" that I didn't know about. Engineers are not bound by any commitment to not point each other's bad science out...I assure you. We're not like doctors who have some kind of liability insurance creedo going. I'll talk smack about any engineer who signs his name to nonsense, rubbish, or just plain NIST-type crap.
Just wanted to set the record straight.
twelve inch-thick thermite filled walls would explode into searing white-hot flames, destroying the files, the safe and most of the old house in seconds.
Originally posted by Rotator
Had to be setup before imo.
The idea of pre placing Thermite to blow apart twelve inch thick walls is not new. Exactly 3 years prior to 911 Joe Vialls published a document talking about that very idea.
Originally posted by tetragrammation
my personal opinion is that 9/11 is a conspiracy, fact. there is more evidence that suggests it's a cover-up than evidence that suggests it's not. And, importantly, the evidence that backs up the official reasons for the collapse is fatally flawed..thus supporting the evidence that opposes it!