It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Tuttle
reply to post by DAZ21
Lincoln turns the bankers down, and uses funds directly from the Treasury. The Rothschilds then decide to threaten Lincoln and use Britain and France as a force to join the Confederacy. The U.S enlist the help of Russia, who also remain free from the bankers grasps. The bankers decide to back down
Sorry but can you elaborate on this point please?
It is my understanding both Britain and France supported the confederate states over the Union for one reason, trade, the cotton trade to be precise. However very soon into the war, the North threatened to cut off Britains grain shipments, Britain then promptly ceased all support to the South and encouraged Egypt and India to begin producing cotton instead.
Sources would be appreciated cheers, and legitimate sources at that.edit on 5-2-2013 by Tuttle because: (no reason given)
Instead of having the information spoon feed to you, maybe do your own research and find your own sources instead of having someone else to do all the hauling. If you don’t like the information provided, counter it with your own “sources”
Originally posted by camaro68ss
Originally posted by Putyournamehere
Why hasn't anyone debunked this yet?
because its all true
Originally posted by Tuttle
reply to post by camaro68ss
Instead of having the information spoon feed to you, maybe do your own research and find your own sources instead of having someone else to do all the hauling. If you don’t like the information provided, counter it with your own “sources”
It is not my thread, the onus is not on me to prove anything, unless asked. I have asked the poster to provide a source for his claims, this is not unreasonable surely?
Also man, i'm not really sure what acting like a weirdo with strangers on the internet is all about, im a pretty laid back person, so please dont act weird with a strange attitude in the future, cheers.
Well thats just not true, The Peoples Bank of China is not controlled by Rothschild,
Bank of America derived 9 percent of its total revenue from Asia for the year ended Dec. 31, 2009, the first since the merger, up from 2.4 percent in the previous two years, according to the company’s annual reports.
Originally posted by Tuttle
reply to post by camaro68ss
Well then when the Alien life forms from Qauzdarack 9 ask the Rothschilds for the money they lent them in 500 million BC to defeat the dinosaurs we are all going to be in some trouble, because 500 million years of interest on 9583749596749302 qaudrazilion space dollars is at least 48458574937394739475956060 to the power 5 more than what it was then.
And how are they possibly going to repay them?, well they cant. The only way to do that would be to install lazer beams on our head and activate the brain inplants and turn us into an invincible LAZOR army to do battle with the Qauzdarackians on the battle fields of Mars.
My source?
ORIGINAL RESEARCH!
BOOM!
No further explanation required.
Originally posted by Putyournamehere
Why hasn't anyone debunked this yet?
Originally posted by Tuttle
reply to post by DAZ21
Lincoln turns the bankers down, and uses funds directly from the Treasury. The Rothschilds then decide to threaten Lincoln and use Britain and France as a force to join the Confederacy. The U.S enlist the help of Russia, who also remain free from the bankers grasps. The bankers decide to back down
Sorry but can you elaborate on this point please?
It is my understanding both Britain and France supported the confederate states over the Union for one reason, trade, the cotton trade to be precise. However very soon into the war, the North threatened to cut off Britains grain shipments, Britain then promptly ceased all support to the South and encouraged Egypt and India to begin producing cotton instead.
Sources would be appreciated cheers, and legitimate sources at that.edit on 5-2-2013 by Tuttle because: (no reason given)