It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
en.wikipedia.org...
The Supremacy Clause only applies if Congress is acting in pursuit of its constitutionally authorized powers. Federal laws are valid and are supreme, so long as those laws were adopted in pursuance of—that is, consistent with—the Constitution. Nullification, is the legal theory that states have the right to nullify, or invalidate, any federal laws which they view as being unconstitutional; or any federal law that the states view as having exceeded Congresses’ constitutionally authorized powers.
The courts have found that under Article III of the Constitution, the final power to declare federal laws unconstitutional has been delegated to the federal courts and that the states therefore do not have the power to nullify federal law.
en.wikipedia.org...
The Tenth Amendment is similar to an earlier provision of the Articles of Confederation: "Each state retains its sovereignty, freedom, and independence, and every power, jurisdiction, and right, which is not by this Confederation expressly delegated to the United States, in Congress assembled." After the Constitution was ratified, some wanted to add a similar amendment limiting the federal government to powers "expressly" delegated, which would have denied implied powers. However, the word "expressly" ultimately did not appear in the Tenth Amendment as ratified, and therefore the Tenth Amendment did not reject the powers implied by the Necessary and Proper Clause.
When he introduced the Tenth Amendment in Congress, James Madison explained that many states were eager to ratify this amendment, despite critics who deemed the amendment superfluous or unnecessary:
I find, from looking into the amendments proposed by the State conventions, that several are particularly anxious that it should be declared in the Constitution, that the powers not therein delegated should be reserved to the several States. Perhaps words which may define this more precisely than the whole of the instrument now does, may be considered as superfluous. I admit they may be deemed unnecessary: but there can be no harm in making such a declaration, if gentlemen will allow that the fact is as stated. I am sure I understand it so, and do therefore propose it.
tenthamendmentcenter.com...
About the Tenth Amendment
“The Tenth Amendment was intended to confirm the understanding of the people at the time the Constitution was adopted, that powers not granted to the United States were reserved to the States or to the people. It added nothing to the instrument as originally ratified.” – United States v. Sprague, 282 U.S. 716, 733 (1931).
The founding fathers had good reason to pen the Tenth Amendment.
The issue of power – and especially the great potential for a power struggle between the federal and the state governments – was extremely important to the America’s founders. They deeply distrusted government power, and their goal was to prevent the growth of the type of government that the British has exercised over the colonies.
Adoption of the Constitution of 1787 was opposed by a number of well-known patriots including Patrick Henry, Samuel Adams, Thomas Jefferson, and others. They passionately argued that the Constitution would eventually lead to a strong, centralized state power which would destroy the individual liberty of the People. Many in this movement were given the poorly-named tag “Anti-Federalists.”
The Tenth Amendment was added to the Constitution of 1787 largely because of the intellectual influence and personal persistence of the Anti-Federalists and their allies.
It’s quite clear that the Tenth Amendment was written to emphasize the limited nature of the powers delegated to the federal government. In delegating just specific powers to the federal government, the states and the people, with some small exceptions, were free to continue exercising their sovereign powers.
When states and local communities take the lead on policy, the people are that much closer to the policymakers, and policymakers are that much more accountable to the people. Few Americans have spoken with their president; many have spoken with their mayor.
Adherence to the Tenth Amendment is the first step towards ensuring liberty in the United States. Liberty through decentralization.
Bush was following an Agenda and now Obama is following his. Apparently people think it's ok for Obama to extend the Patriot Act because Bush signed it off first. Where the hell is the logic in that? Seriously?
But I wouldn't worry about NDAA as much as the two American citizens being killed in Yemen. And now free speech is being limited because you might be "offending" someone. Mmmmmm I love Big Brother.
Nice ranting. That is, redneck style.
Just accept the fact a black man was re-elected into the white house. This Alex Jones "Hate the black man in the WH" doesnt work here buddy. Obama will be in office 4 more years and save this country from fringe KKK lunatics and other assorted right wing trash trying to destroy it from within.
Originally posted by johncarter
reply to post by seabag
Nice ranting. That is, redneck style.
Just accept the fact a black man was re-elected into the white house. This Alex Jones "Hate the black man in the WH" doesnt work here buddy. Obama will be in office 4 more years and save this country from fringe FOX news lunatics and other assorted right wing trash trying to destroy it from within.edit on 31-1-2013 by johncarter because: (no reason given)edit on 31-1-2013 by johncarter because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by johncarter
Nice ranting. That is, redneck style.
Thanks!
Leave your S&F on the OP!
Just accept the fact a black man was re-elected into the white house. This Alex Jones "Hate the black man in the WH" doesnt work here buddy. Obama will be in office 4 more years and save this country from fringe KKK lunatics and other assorted right wing trash trying to destroy it from within.
The lowest form of logical fallacy is race baiting.
I take it you have no point to make?
Would it change your view if I told you I wasn’t white?
Originally posted by Wanderer777
reply to post by johncarter
He is and always has been an evil man. The color of his skin has nothing to do with it. It is what he is doing as president
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by Wanderer777
All you can do is shine the spotlight on people like that.
Check it out at this link.
Be sure to read the OP, too.
It's funny you keep bringing up Fox, because I've never watched Fox once in my life. Have you ever once done any research on the man? Here ill post a video so you dont have to read. Because reading is bad. Im sure you support him because he's going to make it to where you never have to have a job. Never have to worry about getting your OWN house. Hey all these people that ARE working will pay for it so why am I worried. Yeah real stand up guy if you like thievery.
Everything in this video isnt crazy tin foil hat stuff. it is the truth from an ex marine who actually fought to support this country unlike you.
Originally posted by CosmicCitizen
IMPEACHMENT trumps Revolution. If the problem lies primarily at the top then the leadership should be replaced....especially peacefully and legally.
Originally posted by johncarter
reply to post by seabag
Nice ranting. That is, redneck style.
Just accept the fact a black man was re-elected into the white house. This Alex Jones "Hate the black man in the WH" doesnt work here buddy. Obama will be in office 4 more years