It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
A true free market is impossible under capitalism and guaranteed by socialism.
For those who have problems with "socialist" why is it such a "dirty word" don't see why the op is getting crap for the term usage after all:
Originally posted by neo96
reply to post by seabag
Your right socialism doesn't work because they can't admit it they have ran out of money even after printing 10 trillion dollars more.;
M2 money supply:
www.usdebtclock.org...
Here is a quotation from Hans-Hermann Hoppe’s book, A Theory of Socialism and Capitalism, in which Hoppe presents his system for classifying socialism into four major types: Analyzed in some detail are the particular disruptive effects that are produced:
(1) by a traditional Marxist policy of nationalizing or socializing the means of production, or rather, by the expropriation of private owners of means of production;
(2) by a revisionist, social-democratic policy of egalitarian income redistribution;
(3) by a conservatively minded policy of attempting to preserve the status quo through economic and behavioral regulations and price controls; and
(4) by a technocratically minded system of pragmatic, piecemeal social and economic engineering and intervention.
Socialism is a socio-economic system in which property and the distribution of wealth are subject to control by the workers,
either directly through popular collectives such as workers' councils, or indirectly exercised on behalf of the people by the state,
and in which Egalitarianism or equality is an important goal.
Thus, under Socialism, the means of production are owned by the state, community or the workers (as opposed to privately owned as under Capitalism).
There's no logical reason that we can't find a way to give everybody a relatively decent baseline. There is no reason that our people should be hungry, homeless, or otherwise destitute.
Originally posted by timetothink
reply to post by XPLodER
How is the government supplying you with a house from someone else's money, freedom and liberty?
It's not for the person supplying the money.
Everyone is responsible for their own welfare and purchases. Guns are a purchase, we are not asking the government to pay for them.
You are way off on your attempted analogy.
where jesus would want you to care about the suffering of the poor.
Originally posted by Ghost375
I don't know what's worse, that you people believe this corporate bought stooge really wants those things, or that you feel that people don't deserve those rights.
Originally posted by seabag
Originally posted by Ghost375
I don't know what's worse, that you people believe this corporate bought stooge really wants those things, or that you feel that people don't deserve those rights.
Those things are not RIGHTS.
The RIGHT to a home?
The RIGHT to economic security??
What country (or planet) do you live in that establishes those rights??
Originally posted by seabag
reply to post by XPLodER
where jesus would want you to care about the suffering of the poor.
Are you REALLY making the case that Jesus would be a socialist??
You should be ashamed, sir.
Would Jesus legislate away a percentage of my salary for someone who chooses not to work?
Thessalonians 3:10-12:
"If anyone is not willing to work, let him not eat. For we hear that some among you walk in idleness, not busy at work but busybodies. Now such persons we command and encourage in the Lord Jesus Christ to do their own work quietly and to earn their own living."
I think you need to go back to bible study.
where jesus would want you to care about the suffering of the poor
Are you REALLY making the case that Jesus would be a socialist
Those things are not RIGHTS.
The RIGHT to a home?
The RIGHT to economic security??
What country (or planet) do you live in that establishes those rights??