It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SPEZNA1
IMO i think ANON is the government. Think of if you were playing chess, our gov is several moves ahead and can afford make little mistakes but are able to keep the goal the same......Checkmate.
If you create the need for more control, then you will achieve more control.
Jus' Sayin'
spez
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by Catalyst317
All Anon is doing is giving the government an excuse to crack down on the internet which will only affect the common person not the people who can exploit the the system.
I would not be surprised if "Anon" group was the government. They have exposed nothing and done nothing other than threaten and pull pranks.
Originally posted by interupt42
Originally posted by votan
reply to post by Catalyst317
All Anon is doing is giving the government an excuse to crack down on the internet which will only affect the common person not the people who can exploit the the system.
I would not be surprised if "Anon" group was the government. They have exposed nothing and done nothing other than threaten and pull pranks.
Ditto . They are only helping the gov't to justify more internet regulations. Besides do you really think that anything of top secret level or above is some how connected to the internet?
I can be certain that the publicly available site ussc.gov does not contain any top secret or sensitive data worth hacking. The only thing accomplished by this act is giving bogus justification to the gov't to crack down on the internet and to continue expanding big brother presence on the internet.
Originally posted by dieseldyk
Asteroids?
Assuming Anon acts logically. This maybe a clue as to the information (if any) that anon has. Perhaps there is an asteroid impact that is expected. It would explain the bunker building, the excessive printing of money to fund bunkers, the asset buying binge (gold, oil etc.), the Jesse Ventura black coffins.
Governments and global businesses are preparing for a financial crash, but maybe its an asteroid crash. Pure speculation on my part.
Originally posted by HawkeyeNation
It's nothing...Anon is just applying for a gov't job. Instead of an interview he just shows them what he can do. He'll be a member of the gov't soon enough.
Originally posted by dieseldyk
Asteroids?
Assuming Anon acts logically. This maybe a clue as to the information (if any) that anon has. Perhaps there is an asteroid impact that is expected. It would explain the bunker building, the excessive printing of money to fund bunkers, the asset buying binge (gold, oil etc.), the Jesse Ventura black coffins.
Governments and global businesses are preparing for a financial crash, but maybe its an asteroid crash. Pure speculation on my part.
Originally posted by Catalyst317
reply to post by Anishnaabe
They had stated in their video that they were playing a game with the government and the only winning move is not to play.:
Originally posted by gman1972
Originally posted by Catalyst317
reply to post by Anishnaabe
They had stated in their video that they were playing a game with the government and the only winning move is not to play.:
Any one remember a movie "War Games" from the mid 80s with Mathew Brodrick? To sumerize, he was a teenage computer hacker who cracked into a military computer which ran the defence system and accidently almost started a nuculear war. At the end when the computer is figuring out a firing solution to destroy the USSR it's also running a far fetched game of tick tack toe which taught the computer the reality of playing a game which was almost impossible to win. After the computer figures out what mutually assured distruction is by way of never winning tick tack toe and not finding a way to destroy the USSR without wiping out the US as well, the program stops and the computer says to the creator of the computer, "a strange game, the only winning move is not to play"
This along with the nuculear referrence... well I just find it curious.