Lightning Guns - Patent Published 2013-01-17

a reply to: Phage

Lol if it didn't make sense the U.S. Patent office would not have granted the patent. Your mental capacity is not unlike those that believed the was flat.

a reply to: Phage
Apparently you have not read the patent.
It bears striking resemblance to Nikola Tesla's patent
he called a weather machine. Tesla was convinced that smashing high powered radars together would result in chain lightning & rolling thunder. Digital synchronization was not available back in Tesla's days as they are today.

FDA might have something to say about it...

a reply to: InTheKnow123

Apparently you have not read the patent.

You are in error.

Tesla was convinced that smashing high powered radars together would result in chain lightning & rolling thunder.

Tesla had a number of silly ideas. Never mind the fact that he knew nothing of radar.

a reply to: Phage

Lookup Tesla's "Weather Machine" patent drawings it clearly depicts and states 2 large radar dishes aimed at each other.

a reply to: InTheKnow123

I cannot find such a patent.
Can you provide the patent number?

a reply to: InTheKnow123
USPTO PATENT Examiners are established experts in the exact field USPTO employs them in. If the patent examiner is not convinced it will actually work, no patent will be granted.

a reply to: InTheKnow123

Lol if it didn't make sense the U.S. Patent office would not have granted the patent.

Why not?
Does this make sense?
www.google.com...

a reply to: Phage
No it is Classified. Over 1,000 of Nikola Tesla's patents remain to this day classified.

a reply to: InTheKnow123

No it is Classified.

So, how can I look it up? You told me to look it up.
Do you have security clearances? How did you see the "radar dishes?"

a reply to: InTheKnow123

If the patent examiner is not convinced it will actually work, no patent will be granted.

False.
No such requirement.
www.bitlaw.com...

a reply to: Phage

There are some see books in my Lisbrary that speak of it and show the drawings.

a reply to: InTheKnow123

There are some see books in my Lisbrary that speak of it and show the drawings.

But it's secret. Tell me, if you knew it was secret, why did you tell me to "look it up?"

I don't believe that Tesla knew anything about radar. Especially since he didn't believe that radio would be of much use for anything. His big thing was the transmission of electricity through the ground.

a reply to: Phage

Unbelievable the lies you put out. According to your logic a kindergarten teacher could serve as a USPTO Examiner/Expert deciding what patent subject matter is bona fide " new material", wether the described invention makes sense or not, and weather the described invention will teach others in the field how to duplicate it, which is the real purpose of a patent in the first place. Surprising you don't already know this. What is your educational & work background? Couch potato?!

a reply to: Phage

Why haven't you simply Googled "Tesla Weather Machine" do your own research.

I've pointed this thread in the correct direction for now. Goodnight

a reply to: InTheKnow123

According to your logic a kindergarten teacher could serve as a USPTO Examiner/Expert deciding what patent subject matter is bona fide " new material", wether the described invention makes sense or not, and weather the described invention will teach others in the field how to duplicate it, which is the real purpose of a patent in the first place.

I don't know the requirements of becoming a patent examiner, but like most bureaucratic positions, they probably are not very restrictive.

BTW, the purpose of a patent not for others to duplicate. It's to make sure that if someone does duplicate it, the inventor is compensated.

a reply to: Phage

Why haven't you simply Googled "Tesla Weather Machine" do your own research.

I did.
No patent came up. You said I could see the patent drawings for it.

a reply to: Phage

this Supreme Court case states it well:
www.aclu.org...

This article also points out the errors of your posts:
c4sif.org...

a reply to: InTheKnow123

this Supreme Court case states it well:

What did the case state? I mean the case, not a blogger's opinion of it. The case was not about an invention, btw.

This article also points out the errors of your posts:

Your source:

But the Patent Act seeks to accomplish this goal by granting to the inventor a limited monopoly1 in exchange for disclosure. That is, patent law encourages disclosure of ideas by rewarding it.

c4sif.org...

a reply to: Phage

Wikipedia explains PATENTS quite well:

en.m.wikipedia.org...