It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
And here is where you fall on your face on ATS. We don't need their names.
Uhm, yeah you do. Particularly when you are aksing pointed questions about Masonry in relation to alleged plotting and scheming by these unnamed persons.
Go read the thread I created mostly in your honor. You seem to constanly utliize the tactics outlined therein.
Mod Note: ALL MEMBERS: We expect civility and decorum within all topics - Please Review This Link.edit on 28-1-2013 by Rising Against because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Their name is Mason. Regardless of their given name, the oath connects the private associations to the fruit of the labor.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
I thought the Masons had NOTHING to do with him?
Why are all these books on invocation of Angelic magic in the library of the Freemasons?
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by thelongjourney
Why are you so sure it doesn't exist? Calling people delusional and acting with a superiority complex, doesn't seem to be a hallmark of Freemasonry, from what I am to understand...edit on 28-1-2013 by VeritasAequitas because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
I have no idea, why do some people think marital rape is fine? You should ask the librarian of the Grand Lodge of Iowa why they have it in inventory.
In 1999, the King family conducted a civil case to consider the existence of an assassination conspiracy. The suit (for wrongful death) mentioned only Loyd Jowers by name, but also alleged government involvement.[3] The jury–six blacks and six whites—found that King had been the victim of assassination by a conspiracy involving the Memphis police as well as federal agencies. This verdict affirmed Ray's innocence, which the King family has always maintained.[47][53] William F. Pepper represented the King family in the trial.[54][55][56] The family requested a mere $100 in restitution to show that they were not pursuing the case for financial gain.
This is not something "we know" but rather something you apparently believe in. I disagree with this claim. The anti-Christ is not an individual but an action an individual may take, much like a satan. These words are mistakenly being used as nouns when they are originally defined as adjectives.
How so? The Anti-Christ will try to appear as Christ. We know this.
The “Good/evil” duality is two different sides of the same coin. They coexist and cannot be separated any more than you can get rid of only one side of a coin.
There are twins in all of religion. One is true and the other a counterfeit.
I agree with this and so I would like to call attention to the context of your posts in this thread. You are accusing the Masons of dreadful actions and I wonder if this is actually how you feel about your own religious organization and beliefs. I sure hope this is not the case and more importantly I hope you understand my point.
The mirror holds the choice we make.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
reply to post by thelongjourney
As for the Masons, they are the Mystery Religion of Babylon. There is no secret here. God said, "Jacob (Farmer) have I loved and Esau (Hunter) have I hated." This is a direct reference to the system of Babylon that is founded on taking rather than giving. The farmer gives and the hunter takes. Follow the thread of truth from Jacob to Jesus and you get the will of God as giving. Follow the will of Esau to Nimrod and you get the will to take. Genesis 3 is all about taking knowledge, which is what the Masons (Builders) have always done. They build the outer temple of the world. This is idolatry and Paganism. Further, the subvert the law in a conspiracy against the people. This is the definition of a private association. It is private and not out in the open. Hidden. Occult. On the other hand, the church doors are open and there are no secrets. One takes and one gives.
edit on 27-1-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Jamjar
reply to post by EnochWasRight
What does the following suggest?
"Not to be an enthusiast, persecutor or slanderer of religion, neither bending towards avarice, injustice, malice, revenge, nor the envy or contempt of mankind, but giving up every selfish propensity which might injure others."
Farmer or hunter?
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
A dishonest Farmer.
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
Was the founder of OTO, Karl Kellner, a Freemason? No matter. The roots of the Mystery School come in all forms. One is like the other if the pursuit is taking knowledge rather than receiving knowledge. If the aim is a conspiracy against the laws (True Landmarks set by God), then Masonic landmarks are bogus. We are all builders and no oath can take this right away from anyone on the street. Associating with the architect is not earned. It's HIS decision alone and God can only give. It's his will be done, not "So mote it be." It's do unto others and not do for one's self. I could go on. It's we the people and not we of the grand lodge. Like it or not, our world reflects the ones who took it. Not for long.
Originally posted by network dude
Originally posted by EnochWasRight
I am sorry, but I have questions and seeing Crowley in full Masonic regalia makes me think he may have been one.
He is wearing OTO regalia. This has also been pointed out to you.
Another lie to further your agenda. But with you crying about being banned and then implying it had something to do with your "knowledge" is just another example of how dishonest you really are.
Integrity=0
Jesus would not be proud of you.edit on 28-1-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)edit on 28-1-2013 by EnochWasRight because: (no reason given)
Which of these 25 Landmarks (linked below) would disqualify Crowley and the lodges he pledged?
I never said Crowley represents all of Masonry.
As for Westboro, there are Baptists that are on the fringe.
Yet, the Masons thrown on the robe of the leader and try to run a global cabal. They thrown on the hat of a general, after taking off the hat of a banker, to both fund and run wars in the name of world government and the "Great Work".
How can you help me see the difference between the average Mason and the ones funding and causing war for profit; building a NWO
If no, why do they use YOUR symbols?
Originally posted by VeritasAequitas
reply to post by justlittleoldme
I haven't said anything about the Masons being bad; I'm referring to the constant denial of any group or organization outside of Freemasonry, who may be responsible for the corruption in today's world...
Instead, we have people labeling others as delusional conspiracy theorists/nuts....I'd like to point out that quite a few of our staff members here, believe in some type of global conspiracy, would you call them delusional nuts too?