It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by Camperguy
Did Timothey McVeigh have a military need to attack the FBI building ... yes the actions at Waco showed him that the FBI had attacked civilians using military equipment and that was not proportional .
I think people would have to be more creative than semi autos when homeland security forces come rolling up to their houses in armoured personal carriers. Tactics used against us in vietnam and the middle east would be something to be interested in, if it gets that bad.
Bill
edit on 28-1-2013 by Camperguy because: repost
Hoping we don't have to find out what tactics are necessary (McVeigh was a nutball, sorry it is the way I see it). In that scenario there is no right, and there are no winners, certain lines should never be crossed in the name of "winning".
Originally posted by Camperguy
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by Camperguy
Did Timothey McVeigh have a military need to attack the FBI building ... yes the actions at Waco showed him that the FBI had attacked civilians using military equipment and that was not proportional .
I think people would have to be more creative than semi autos when homeland security forces come rolling up to their houses in armoured personal carriers. Tactics used against us in vietnam and the middle east would be something to be interested in, if it gets that bad.
Bill
edit on 28-1-2013 by Camperguy because: repost
Hoping we don't have to find out what tactics are necessary (McVeigh was a nutball, sorry it is the way I see it). In that scenario there is no right, and there are no winners, certain lines should never be crossed in the name of "winning".
I agree it was extreme but killing 76 people at Waco to serve a search and arrest warrant was also extreme,considering they had the chance to pick up Koresh in town by himself.
Bill
Originally posted by EarthCitizen07
reply to post by Darkphoenix77
I remember reading years ago in some newspaper that only 10% of the containers are scanned for illegal objects by the port authority. That means there is a 90% chance some container will never get inspected and its payload delivered to the customer.
It is also known that organised crime families have a huge say in what passes inspection. How much oil would it take to grease the necessary folks to give the ok? No money equals no favors? I guess if you are a high level capitalist with millions, billions, trillions to spare then bribing folks is pocket change.
You try to sneak small amounts of narcotics through airport customs, the dogs will go crazy, and you would be serving many years behind bars.edit on 28/1/13 by EarthCitizen07 because: (no reason given)
Well my friend, you can just do what I did.
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
reply to post by Propulsion
touche, I can't refute that logic lmao
Where do I get my own pack of signs so I can be protected as well haha
I even have a couple of those babies on my car....
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
reply to post by Propulsion
touche, I can't refute that logic lmao
Where do I get my own pack of signs so I can be protected as well haha
Originally posted by Propulsion
Well my friend, you can just do what I did.
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
reply to post by Propulsion
touche, I can't refute that logic lmao
Where do I get my own pack of signs so I can be protected as well haha
If you have Photoshop, (or even Windows Paint), you can put together your own signs.
I have about 15 of those babies all around my property! There's no way in hell anyone’s going to come and murder, rape, or pillage my property and/or family!edit on 28-1-2013 by Propulsion because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Alfie1
Originally posted by _BoneZ_
Originally posted by Alfie1
The trouble with the quotes you gave is that I can't find any reliable sources for them. The Thomas Jefferson society cannot find any evidence that he said anything about tyrannical government and opposing it with arms.
The first Jefferson quote, I edited due to the fact that it can't be proven those were his words.
The second Jefferson quote you can find at the Library of Congress:
www.loc.gov...
The Lincoln quote is from his first inaugural address. I'm sure if you look again, you'll find it.
Thanks for link to Jefferson letter of 1787. Am I right in thinking therefore that you accept the often attributed statement to Jefferson of " to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government " is spurious ?
The letter is somewhat sympathetic to a rebellion in Massachusets which he attribures to the ignorance of the people. But he seems mainly concerned with putting over that one rebellion in one state over some years is no big deal. It was written a few years before the 2nd Amendment so if he considered armed rebellion to be desirable for liberty he could no doubt have seen that it was explicitly referred to in the 2nd, which of course he didn't.
I still can't find your Abraham Lincoln quote but we have now moved on 70 years from the 2nd Amendment anyway. I do find it strange that Lincoln should have said anything about the removal of government by revolutionary forces when he spent his whole presidency fighting southern rebellion. He did say this in his first inaugral speech " It follows from these views that no State upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Union; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally void, and that acts of violence within any State or States against the authority of the United States are insurrectionary or revolutionary, according to circumstances." If you can point out just where Lincoln said your quote in his speech I would be grateful.
So far, I have seen nothing to justify that the 2nd Amendment has anything to do with armed resistance to government beyond wishful thinking.
I had tears in my eyes on that one!!!
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
Originally posted by Propulsion
Well my friend, you can just do what I did.
Originally posted by Darkphoenix77
reply to post by Propulsion
touche, I can't refute that logic lmao
Where do I get my own pack of signs so I can be protected as well haha
If you have Photoshop, (or even Windows Paint), you can put together your own signs.
I have about 15 of those babies all around my property! There's no way in hell anyone’s going to come and murder, rape, or pillage my property and/or family!edit on 28-1-2013 by Propulsion because: (no reason given)
Absolutely, I will have to get on that so I can know the luxury of sleeping well at night.
And who would break into your car with such signs, nothing says "This guy means Business!!" like a well crafted Gun Free Zone sign "It says I am not afraid of nuthin'!!!"edit on 28-1-2013 by Darkphoenix77 because: (no reason given)
I had tears in my eyes on that one!!!
My wife is making the stickers as we speak!
We’re jumping up and down with joy right now, thinking about all the money we’re going to have once we turn our guns into the feds!
2 words my friend….TGI Fridays!
Edit: My wife has just finished the first stickers, and am now putting them on our kids lunch boxes!
We're prepping, and will be all secure come tomorrow...!edit on 28-1-2013 by Propulsion because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by eagledriver
Why do you think there has been no budget for the last 4 years, going 5 years? So they spend like drunken sailors with no accountability. Why are they letting gays and women in the military? Coupled with mandatory budget cuts, it will fall apart slowly. How did a obvious habitual liar that failed at everything win a second term?
By elite sponsored voter fraud on a mass scale.
Originally posted by pyramid head
reply to post by EarthCitizen07
AK is good if your a third world amature, with no training, but if you know how to shoot properly, the m-16 is the greatest rifle ever created. The ak is highly inaccurate, and will not serve you well in open field combat. The m-16 and its various versions are used by all the highest trained US military outfits for a reason. I have used and own one, it is the most accurate combat rifle in the world.