It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by crappiekat
Waco Texas.
First thing I thought of when I saw this thread.
I know David Koresh was a nutcase. And the Branch Davidians were a religious cult.
IMHO, I think this is a bad headline, waiting to happen.
If[/b ]they advertise their venture in this way.
edit on 13-1-2013 by crappiekat because: sp
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by badgerprints
Professional athletes are paid millions of dollars though. Cult members give their assets to the cult. Hence the donation form immediately below the story. They want to get you donating right away. No wasting time getting settled in an actual community.
Originally posted by TheComte
reply to post by badgerprints
Are saying this commune is a charity?
The most severe disciplinary action may include the loss of Lease and expulsion from the community.
adhesion contract (contract of adhesion) n. a contract (often a signed form) so imbalanced in favor of one party over the other that there is a strong implication it was not freely bargained. Example: a rich landlord dealing with a poor tenant who has no choice and must accept all terms of a lease, no matter how restrictive or burdensome, since the tenant cannot afford to move. An adhesion contract can give the little guy the opportunity to claim in court that the contract with the big shot is invalid.
There is nothing unenforceable or even wrong about adhesion contracts. Insurance contracts and residential leases are kinds of adhesion contracts. This does not mean, however, that all adhesion contracts are valid. Many adhesion contracts are Unconscionable; they are so unfair to the weaker party that a court will refuse to enforce them.
Originally posted by Tardacus
The most severe disciplinary action may include the loss of Lease and expulsion from the community.
so, you won`t actually own the land or your home, you will be leasing one or both?
since it`s a lease agreement than it has to conform to the laws.
adhesion contract (contract of adhesion) n. a contract (often a signed form) so imbalanced in favor of one party over the other that there is a strong implication it was not freely bargained. Example: a rich landlord dealing with a poor tenant who has no choice and must accept all terms of a lease, no matter how restrictive or burdensome, since the tenant cannot afford to move. An adhesion contract can give the little guy the opportunity to claim in court that the contract with the big shot is invalid.
There is nothing unenforceable or even wrong about adhesion contracts. Insurance contracts and residential leases are kinds of adhesion contracts. This does not mean, however, that all adhesion contracts are valid. Many adhesion contracts are Unconscionable; they are so unfair to the weaker party that a court will refuse to enforce them.edit on 13-1-2013 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by badgerprints
Originally posted by Tardacus
The most severe disciplinary action may include the loss of Lease and expulsion from the community.
so, you won`t actually own the land or your home, you will be leasing one or both?
since it`s a lease agreement than it has to conform to the laws.
adhesion contract (contract of adhesion) n. a contract (often a signed form) so imbalanced in favor of one party over the other that there is a strong implication it was not freely bargained. Example: a rich landlord dealing with a poor tenant who has no choice and must accept all terms of a lease, no matter how restrictive or burdensome, since the tenant cannot afford to move. An adhesion contract can give the little guy the opportunity to claim in court that the contract with the big shot is invalid.
There is nothing unenforceable or even wrong about adhesion contracts. Insurance contracts and residential leases are kinds of adhesion contracts. This does not mean, however, that all adhesion contracts are valid. Many adhesion contracts are Unconscionable; they are so unfair to the weaker party that a court will refuse to enforce them.edit on 13-1-2013 by Tardacus because: (no reason given)
Yep.
Just like tens of thousands of existing communities all over the US.
The POA can take your home in most planned communities for simple infractions. Are they all cults?
Originally posted by antonia
It may start with good intentions, but generally these sorts of things always fall apart. The problem is someone in there is going to be the alpha dog. They will start calling the shots. They will start demanding the others live the way they deem right and the whole "live and let live" idea will fall apart.
We are talking about humans right? Someone always takes charge and directs the group. It's just how it goes.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
reply to post by skalla
the US would appear to be collapsing in on itself if this is it's future.
That is the problem. The US IS COLLAPSING on itself, and it is not because of this idea. Just look at how many young people cannot get jobs, and are living with their parents, even with a college education. Such a country cannot survive very long. In addition, a country cannot survive long by printing money, because at some point, nobody with accept it. People who fail to learn from the lessons of history are doomed to repeat it, Witness Nazi Germany and the super inflation that occurred there.
Originally posted by antonia
reply to post by Tardacus
Is that true? I've heard of people getting repoed by HOA's so I'm not sure about that.
Originally posted by ProfEmeritus
This is an extremely interesting idea. It certainly gives people the opportunity to avoid some of the liberal, socialist trends that are accelerating under the current administration. I'd like to know how many people would consider joining such a community. Furthermore, I'd like to know whether those that are opposed to the current direction of this country, would be willing to help build such a community if one were available in your state?
One of the things that could accelerate such a movement, would be if the free militias of the various states were to endorse and agree to be part of such communities. If such communities were fairly self-sufficient, they could barter and avoid income and sales taxes. In addition, the idea of teaching schools without socialist leanings seems very attractive.
I know that economic issues may make it very hard for many people to join, but theoretically, would you be willing to participate in such an endeavor?
Let's try to keep this free from trolling, personal attacks, and just stick to the issue.
I believe that this is an important idea for a country that most believe is broken, and many believe is so corrupt that free elections are all but impossible.
cnsnews.com
(visit the link for the full news article)