It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
reply to post by eLPresidente
You are right. I believe more guns will deter violence, crimes, and aggression, and more nukes, spread evenly will deter aggression between nation. Cold war nuclear stand off between USA and USSR would be the major case to reference. Neither party wanted to be destroyed so they both backed off.
Originally posted by happykat39
I don't know if this is true or not,but either way it is disturbing. The idea of a nuclear armed Iran should have world leaders much more concerned than than they seem to be. I don't know anyone personally that has a single doubt that Iran will use their nukes as soon as they have enough of them. But our leaders still think they can negotiate with mad men.
www.wnd.com
(visit the link for the full news article)
Originally posted by leemachino
How can anyone claim that kind of success without a test?
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Some people here seem to think it is difficult to build an old style Nuclear Fission Bomb...it is not. What is hard is to get the proper amount of Atomic Fuel and have it enriched to Weapons grade use.
Iran is trying very hard to get enough Weapons Grade Uranium to build several bombs. Has it built them yet? No...but then again...building them is not hard.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
reply to post by superman2012
Iran's own admission that it has built and is running over 10,000 centrifuges for the purpose of enriching Uranium. The only possible reason for Iran to use that many Centrifuges which is a very old and slow way to enrich Uranium to weapons grade...is to get enough enriched Uranium to build anywhere from 3 to 7 Nukes.
Split Infinity
Originally posted by shapur
reply to post by SplitInfinity
I know what he does in front of a mirror,when there is nobody around..