It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by ObservingYou
Actually I'm pretty good friends with an older Scottish gentleman who was posted to Faulklands -
If you consider sending a trained proffesional army over to a distant island to slaughter women and children fighting for their indepenace a GOOD cause, you are very much mistaken.
When re-counting his exsperiences the grown man, broke down and cried in the pub - he said it altered everything about him.
A few alternate history books may change your opinion also.
And they are not "our" people - WTF have we got in common?!
Sorry, but this is total rubbish. The Falklanders were fighting for their independance? Women and children being killed by British troops? Yeah, right! Total honk.
We were fighting to free them from a bunch of mass-murdering facists.edit on 6-1-2013 by AngryCymraeg because: Typo
mass-murdering facists.
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by Rapha
It may be about the black stuff for the elites..
Originally posted by kingmonkey
Hmm, so you take land thousands of miles from your own land, populate it, call these people indigenous, then have them vote to decide the fate of this land. Sounds fair.
As a previous poster has said, the Empire is over. Perhaps Cameron would do well to hand back the Malvinas and apologise to every country the British Empire has spilled blood in.
Originally posted by MickeyMarley
Originally posted by EvanB
reply to post by Rapha
It may be about the black stuff for the elites..
Guinness?
Originally posted by stumason
Originally posted by ObservingYou
Do you really think we were over there to fight for a minority of people who claim to be British?
I can promise you, most us Brits do not consider those people far away across the sea as British - far from it.
A minority ? 99% is a minority now is it?
As for your second line, you're talking out of your arse. Everyone I know is 100% behind defending them.
Originally posted by ObservingYou
Actually I'm pretty good friends with an older Scottish gentleman who was posted to Faulklands -
If you consider sending a trained proffesional army over to a distant island to slaughter women and children fighting for their indepenace a GOOD cause, you are very much mistaken.
When re-counting his exsperiences the grown man, broke down and cried in the pub - he said it altered everything about him.
A few alternate history books may change your opinion also.
And they are not "our" people - WTF have we got in common?!
Now I know you're just talking crap.... Everything you just said above is a bare faced lie.
How did we send an army to "slaughter women and children fighting for independence? Jesus man, what are you smoking? Do you know anything about the Falklands at all?
Originally posted by boymonkey74
reply to post by kingmonkey
OMG they have lived there for over 170 years, they were the first people to have a permanent settlement there.
Argentina wasn't even around at that time and like others have said Argentina was founded by conquistadors from spain, so If we give the falklands back the Argentinians have to give Argentina back to the natives....but the Falklands never had natives on it.
GOOD GOD PEOPLE READ THE BLOODY THREAD I'M SICK OF SAYING THE SAME THINGS.
Gonna make a brew and watch Dexter now
Originally posted by Zcustosmorum
What a sleaze ball, this is decoration playing to the voters. And Argentina are in no position for war. Pathetic
And Rupert Murdoch and his toilet rag The Sun can get lost also, it's nothing but sabre rattling to the public.edit on 6-1-2013 by Zcustosmorum because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
Originally posted by kingmonkey
Hmm, so you take land thousands of miles from your own land, populate it, call these people indigenous, then have them vote to decide the fate of this land. Sounds fair.
As a previous poster has said, the Empire is over. Perhaps Cameron would do well to hand back the Malvinas and apologise to every country the British Empire has spilled blood in.
By the same yardstick would you like to see Australia given back to the Aborigines? New Zealand to the Maories? Oregon and most of the Mid-West given back to the Native Americans?
The Falklanders have been there since 1833. I think that gives them a stake in matters.
Originally posted by InitiumArietis
There is possibly a diplomatic solution to this. We keep the Falkland's and they can have Northern Ireland
Originally posted by AngryCymraeg
reply to post by ObservingYou
Well for a start you mentioned fighting for independence (???) and also murdering women and children. There's no way that the former is right and the latter is demonstrably untrue.
Originally posted by stumason
reply to post by ObservingYou
I'm sorry, but it is a bare faced lie. I'll say it even more directly, you're "mate" is a liar or, more likely, simply made up. Only 3 civilians died during the whole sorry affair caused by a stray shell. The Islands have a monument to those who died and list only 3 people as being lost.
What proof, if any, do you have of any massacres or that we went there to fight the islanders?