It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
Originally posted by JustgibberisH
this whole thread is nothing but dick measuring. oh its this gun, no its this gun stfu and move on. its not like it matters
No, its actually a PSL with an ATI Fiberforce stock chambered in 7.62 x 54R or .308
Its not a "this" or "that" gun.edit on 20-12-2012 by GeisterFahrer because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
ATI Fiberforce Dragunov stock.
It was a Bushmaster .223
any questions?
Originally posted by EyesWideShut
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
Originally posted by JustgibberisH
this whole thread is nothing but dick measuring. oh its this gun, no its this gun stfu and move on. its not like it matters
No, its actually a PSL with an ATI Fiberforce stock chambered in 7.62 x 54R or .308
Its not a "this" or "that" gun.edit on 20-12-2012 by GeisterFahrer because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by GeisterFahrer
ATI Fiberforce Dragunov stock.
It was a Bushmaster .223
any questions?
Make up your mind, Yesterday it was an AR...NOW it's a PSL!?!... No one in their right mind puts an ATI on a PSL. ATI makes crap. Also a PSL has a two foot barrel, that barrel wasn't two feet. I know your ego doesn't want to admit it's wrong, but give it up...it's a saiganov. If you can't tell the difference between an AR and a PSL...this isn't the thread for you to post on.
Originally posted by sputniksteve
reply to post by starviego
Yup, that article flat out says he left a shotgun in the car, as well as earlier saying they found a Saiga shotgun at the scene.
Originally posted by starviego
www.courant.com...
from Dec 19
Sources said that Nancy Lanza owned at least five guns and that all of them were purchased legally since her divorce in 2009.
Except that there were seven guns seized at her home and the crime scene: the Bushmaster, Sig Sauer, Glock, Marlin, Saiga, Henry, and the Enfield.
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by GeisterFahrer
The news has stated it was a shotgun,
and we have a clear video of a shotgun and a huge shell being ejected.
You're argument hinges on it reflecting light and appearing brass. That's weak considering the qualit of the digital video (zoomed)
Originally posted by GogoVicMorrow
reply to post by GeisterFahrer
I used to have some nice shiny gold shells. You guys are wrong about this. The news has stated it was a shotgun, and we have a clear video of a shotgun and a huge shell being ejected. You're argument hinges on it reflecting light and appearing brass. That's weak considering the qualit of the digital video (zoomed) and the fact that 12 ga shells are shiny and can be gold.
Originally posted by XTexan
Ya I see it. Watch it full screen, at 2 seconds in you can see the high cap magazine, between 2-4 seconds the officer removes the magazine. The pistol grip is visible several times in the video.
I don't have a enfield, but is it available in a similar configuration?
I don't believe the henry does and he's not cycling a bolt action so that rules out the marlin
edit on 19-12-2012 by XTexan because: (no reason given)edit on 19-12-2012 by XTexan because: add a question
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by sputniksteve
Then perhaps you'd like to provide a picture and video for a shotgun that looks like this one and discharges like it? OH, and you need to show me a shotgun registered to Nancy Lanza or purported to have been used. She had rifles and handguns, that's it.
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by sputniksteve
And yet, still, for the thousandth time, you have not provided a pic or video of a gun configured like this that is, indeed, a shotgun or anything other than a close match to a Bushmaster.
And you are making "positive" identification of the ROUND from the video, but can't even identify what the GUN is? Please. Try a little harder.edit on 19-12-2012 by 00nunya00 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by sputniksteve
But, because you want to think the Bushmaster wasn't in the trunk, you're willing to come up with a million unverifiable reasons why this was not the Bushmaster, and that's better than identifying the gun based on matching photos of what we KNOW was in there and what she had? That doesn't cut it.
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by bjax9er
Oh, for sure. It only looks like a Bushmaster. And we have all this proof that a bunco-playing stay-at-home mom had illegally unregistered weapons in her possession, that makes total sense. ??? Seriously?
Originally posted by 00nunya00
reply to post by Domo1
It's a side-slide modification. Reread the OP.
1)The obvious grip with finger-shapes in it