It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by freedomSlave
reply to post by hawkiye
Your staged mind control shootings are not going to do it. Even if you manage to get some bogus unconstitutional law passed it won't matter the vast majority will not comply!
Mind control .. Odd there have been mass murders before electricity . were they using some kinda jedi mind tricks before to get people to have mental disorders ?
As for the nwo they have other countries with resources they can still take over ... secondly if they control governments and military .. they have rockets and lazer and space weaponry drones . your little guns are like someone trying to pick a fight with you and your gun with a twig ..edit on 15/12/12 by freedomSlave because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by MrSpad
No. I support the second amendment but, the idea that a mob of people with guns could stop and organized miltary force is beyond silly. They would be slaughtered in a stand up fight and if they were truly facing ruthless power like the NWO then any type of attempt at a guerilla actvity would lead to the exteremination of entire citiies. What you see in Iraq and Afganistan is the West who has revuslion from killing civilians or comitting mass murder. The first time you rebel against a true tyranical power they will act like the Germans when Heydrich was assasinated and destroy to villiages and the people that lived in them. So you can put away the fantasy that gun ownership in the US is some sort threat to truly tyranical power because it is not.
Originally posted by MrSpad
No. I support the second amendment but, the idea that a mob of people with guns could stop and organized miltary force is beyond silly. They would be slaughtered in a stand up fight and if they were truly facing ruthless power like the NWO then any type of attempt at a guerilla actvity would lead to the exteremination of entire citiies. What you see in Iraq and Afganistan is the West who has revuslion from killing civilians or comitting mass murder. The first time you rebel against a true tyranical power they will act like the Germans when Heydrich was assasinated and destroy to villiages and the people that lived in them. So you can put away the fantasy that gun ownership in the US is some sort threat to truly tyranical power because it is not.
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by hawkiye
They need to take a look at violent video games and some of the prescription medications some of these kids are taking that warns of suicidal behavior. Mental heath needs to be addressed and treated for the epidemic it actually is and we need to have stricter and more conscientious gun control.
I also think it would be a great idea to start teaching mediation and conflict negotiations in school so every skinny, weakling and coward does not feel the only solution to his "deficiencies" is to arm himself to the teeth to show what a big man he is. This is flawed and sad thinking by people who are impotent without their guns. Doesn't have to be that way but like that commercial where the tough guy kicks sand in the face of the skinny weakling - it is effective at making men think if they get a gun, all their problems will be over and they will suddenly be big and brave. It doesn't work that way.
A little gun control and responsibility is needed. 1.4 million guns were stolen from homes and cars in 2005-2010! That's not responsible gun ownership - that is just providing guns to criminals.
If we do not implement sensible solutions now - I foresee the day that guns designed to kill humans are banned outright except for hunting.
Originally posted by freedomSlave
reply to post by hawkiye
Your staged mind control shootings are not going to do it. Even if you manage to get some bogus unconstitutional law passed it won't matter the vast majority will not comply!
Mind control .. Odd there have been mass murders before electricity . were they using some kinda jedi mind tricks before to get people to have mental disorders ?
As for the nwo they have other countries with resources they can still take over ... secondly if they control governments and military .. they have rockets and lazer and space weaponry drones . your little guns are like someone trying to pick a fight with you and your gun with a twig ..edit on 15/12/12 by freedomSlave because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by TruthSeekerMike
Originally posted by newcovenant
reply to post by hawkiye
They need to take a look at violent video games and some of the prescription medications some of these kids are taking that warns of suicidal behavior. Mental heath needs to be addressed and treated for the epidemic it actually is and we need to have stricter and more conscientious gun control.
I also think it would be a great idea to start teaching mediation and conflict negotiations in school so every skinny, weakling and coward does not feel the only solution to his "deficiencies" is to arm himself to the teeth to show what a big man he is. This is flawed and sad thinking by people who are impotent without their guns. Doesn't have to be that way but like that commercial where the tough guy kicks sand in the face of the skinny weakling - it is effective at making men think if they get a gun, all their problems will be over and they will suddenly be big and brave. It doesn't work that way.
A little gun control and responsibility is needed. 1.4 million guns were stolen from homes and cars in 2005-2010! That's not responsible gun ownership - that is just providing guns to criminals.
If we do not implement sensible solutions now - I foresee the day that guns designed to kill humans are banned outright except for hunting.
Wow. You're quite a fan of tyranny. Great stuff. Let's regulate ourselves into oppression.
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
Asked and unanswered:
The OP insists that the raison d'être of the 2nd is the peoples right to defend themselves from tyrants, foreign and domestic. Fine.
The Supreme Court upheld Citizens United -- legislation more pernicious to liberty than the Tea Act, by several orders of magnitude, and there was no rallying call for resistance from the NRA or gun enthusiast lobby.
What -- besides the guns themselves -- are they willing to fight for?
I am genuinely curious.
since the Citizens United decision was focused more on free speech, what does that have to do with the 2nd, anyway ?
Originally posted by 0zzymand0s
Asked and unanswered:
The OP insists that the raison d'être of the 2nd is the peoples right to defend themselves from tyrants, foreign and domestic. Fine.
The Supreme Court upheld Citizens United -- legislation more pernicious to liberty than the Tea Act, by several orders of magnitude, and there was no rallying call for resistance from the NRA or gun enthusiast lobby.
What -- besides the guns themselves -- are they willing to fight for?
I am genuinely curious.
any chance you'd care to point that out in the decision, itself ?
Citizens United ruling gave every corporation permission to buy the peoples representatives wholesale
If the Armed forces of America and its government turn against its people, its people don’t stand a chance to believe that you do because you own several guns is laughable.