It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by JonnyMnemonic
If my hypothesis is correct, which it is, that answers every single one of those questions, and many more. Without it, you are left with YOUR theory to explain these events. And what is that theory, by the way?
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
reply to post by JonnyMnemonic
I am a conspiracy theorist like most on this site and enjoy a plausible theory.
Could you post some official news headlines to back your claims?
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by JonnyMnemonic
You just signed up for this site. I've been a member for over five years. . .
There is no "normal". I'm trying to meet you half way. Runaway climate change is likely to occur. Huge methane releases will continue. Eventually ecosystem collapses will occur. I simply think you lack proper scales, and are tying too many things together for which other expanations are more plausible.
Theories exist in science for a wide number of things which simpky aren't so. Again, you lack scales. The concentrations needed to ignite this methane are too large for the amount of volume in the atmosphere.
Peace.edit on 16-12-2012 by unityemissions because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by JonnyMnemonic
Your timelime is off. We've known of the methane releases for a while now. Cars have been igniting for a long time... You're just seeing what you want.
Originally posted by AnAbsoluteCreation
reply to post by JonnyMnemonic
At first I thought this was a scripted thread to boast the topic by pretending to have the original author arrive first on the scene. Quite coincidental, no?
Anyway, This topic is interesting but you lose credibility with me when you try to convince me about strange plane happenings and come up with three Romney incidents in a row. Man does he have bad methane hydrates luck?
Anyway, so basically what you are saying is that these eruption will continue to burst more rapidly until all breathable air is gone?
And you give it 5 years? Damn, what are you still doing here?
AACedit on 16-12-2012 by AnAbsoluteCreation because: Oopsedit on 16-12-2012 by AnAbsoluteCreation because: (no reason given)edit on 16-12-2012 by AnAbsoluteCreation because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by unityemissions
reply to post by JonnyMnemonic
I checked your blog. You're too alarmist for me to take seriously. How the hell is this going to cause human beings to he extinct? You realize we're like cockroaches, and they will survive, too, right?
Check my link. We had reports or these massive releases all last year. I've been watching this escalate for years.
As for the exploding cars. I think it's time you back that up. Look, you can't trust the media for an accurate depiction of what's going on. They choose to focus on topics for ratings. They can make a regular occurance into beibg perceived as extraordinary by shaping the context as they see fit. Remember the shark scare in florida? 3,00% increase over the last 12 months or whatever. It's horse poo.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Interesting how you tie "chemtrails" in this one.
Originally posted by JonnyMnemonic
Great, so then if you've known about the methane releases (except for that gigantic one off the US East Coast) then you know about the Clathrate Gun Hypothesis, and how that alone causes mass extinction events.
Cockroaches may indeed survive. I'd expect them to. Insects died off some during the Permian-Triassic, but they did better than anything else except bacteria. But WHY did they survive? It's because they reproduce so quickly. Human life span is going to drop, on average, below the number of years that it takes to conceive a child and raise that child to reproductive age. That's a backwards-looking thing though. It may already be the case, but we won't know it until it's a done deal, as in, everyone is dead in 10 years then we'd know THEN that we had achieved mathematical extinction NOW. Cockroaches need a month or two for a generation. We need much much more than that. They need month or two of breathable air and they have a new generation ready to go. We need a good FIFTEEN YEARS to do the same thing. We aren't gonna have that, not on the surface. Underground or off-planet, else we will go extinct.
And your comment about the media made no sense. So NOW they're 'focusing on ratings' but in February they didn't care about ratings. And all the backing up is there in the monthly event lists. Maybe I'll make a nice chart showing the progressive rise in vehicular fires (and people burning to death inside them). Might be interesting to watch a chart showing average-incinerated-people-per-day. I'll look into that!
BTW, you have NO IDEA how many more people I wake up when I have folks like you around. Spectacular. Much thanks! I could never do this much waking without yas. I should have come here months ago. Didn't realize it'd be this awesome.
Originally posted by Rezlooper
Originally posted by unityemissions
Interesting how you tie "chemtrails" in this one.
Neither I nor the author tied in the chemtrails. Another poster mentioned Ozone and planes and a classified matter with the government. She was asking if the author thought ozone could help.
Originally posted by unityemissions
Originally posted by Rezlooper
Originally posted by unityemissions
Interesting how you tie "chemtrails" in this one.
Neither I nor the author tied in the chemtrails. Another poster mentioned Ozone and planes and a classified matter with the government. She was asking if the author thought ozone could help.
Go back over the posts! He or she replied to this, and added their own reasoning.
Incorrect!
Originally posted by unityemissions
* Why are people seeing flashes of light in the sky and having their homes shaken by unexplained explosions?
It's called, lightning, and thunder.
Originally posted by Lil Drummerboy
reply to post by JonnyMnemonic
I am a conspiracy theorist like most on this site and enjoy a plausible theory.
Could you post some official news headlines to back your claims?
Originally posted by JonnyMnemonic
Originally posted by amatrine
I have a question . I am not a scientist, so this may sound stupid, but I have to ask.
What if we pumped ozone into the atmosphere. I worked for a scientist that invented the ozone machine . I worked for him back in the 80's. He had invented a way for planes to to put ozone into the atmosphere, and the government seized that work and classified it, and he was no longer allowed to pursue that area of work.
I use ozone to this day in my home to kill molds and bacteria. Would ozone in the home have any effect on these gasses if they were to enter the home , ozone is O3, until it destabilizes to 02. How would sulfide react to 03 ?
Thanks
Yes, ozone helps! It reacts away hydrogen sulfide: O3 + H2S --> H2O + O2 + S.
I have three ozone generators going constantly. I don't wanna be seen as promoting any particular product, and I own no stock in ozone generators (or anything else), but ozone generators are a good idea. That should help eliminate any H2S that infiltrates your home. If your clothes or cardboard boxes or books have absorbed any, it should help there too.
Interesting about the planes generating ozone being classified. That's a big problem, how to create ozone in the upper atmosphere. It's so incredibly reactive that it's basically impossible to transport, so it has to be created where you need it. I suspect that's partly what chemtrails and HAARP are for: to generate electrical arcs in the stratosphere, which would create ozone there. If planes could create it too, all the better!