It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
reply to post by sonnny1
I find your lack of faith disturbing! *chokes sonny by merely mimicking the motion* HAHAHA! I had to!
Just highlights the notion that either the White House doesn't really understand what "redress" means or that the People don't.....Either way we are screwed.edit on 14-12-2012 by ownbestenemy because: (no reason given)
What’s the economic calculus behind the Empire’s tactic of
A) building a Death Star,
B) intimidating planets into submission with the threat of destruction,
and C) actually carrying through with said destruction if the planet doesn’t comply?
Economists calculate the cost of building a Death Star
Star Wars fans hoping to build a real Death Star had better get saving – economists have worked out it would cost more than £541,261 trillion just for the raw materials. Is seems that while you should never underestimate the power of the Dark Side, you should also pay attention to the depth of their pockets.
Economics students at Lehigh University in Pennsylvania have calculated that it would require one quadrillion tons of steel to build a Death Star like those that featured in the movies.
It would cost 13,000 times the world's gross domestic product (GDP), or £541,261 trillion, to supply the steel for such a structure while labour and other construction costs would send the price even higher.
They also worked out it would take more than 833,315 years at current production levels to supply enough steel for the 87 mile diameter space craft.
In a tongue-in-cheek report on the Centives blog run by the Lehigh University economics students, they said: "We decided to model the Death Star as having a similar density in steel as a modern warship.
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
I thought Obama said he would definitely "not weaponize space". So was this his supporters who now demand him build a death star in space?
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by ThirdEyeofHorus
I thought Obama said he would definitely "not weaponize space". So was this his supporters who now demand him build a death star in space?
I've heard him make many claims and I heard claims falsely attributed to him but the not weaponizing of space is a new one to me.
Got a quoted source?