It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by marg6043
reply to post by FissionSurplus
Actually what the Supreme court did was to give free reign to obama to tax every single American with Obamacare, and the taxes are piling as we speak, all the fees new increases and taxes are coming and they are going to hit us like a run away train.
Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by NavyDoc
You are not alone in the criticism of how the government conducts itself. I'm right there with you. My theory would only work if things changed in America to the point that government was on a very tight leash.
But I think you can agree that our current system is completely corrupt and capitalistic healthcare is a failure as well.
Originally posted by undo
just out of curiosity i would like to ask a couple questions
i have 3 kids, all of them are adults. 2 can't find jobs. the other is self-employed.
will they all have to pay for health insurance out of their own pockets, even if unemployed or self-employed?
Today, you are not required to have health insurance. But beginning in 2014, most people will have to have it or pay a fine. For individuals, the penalty would start at $95 a year, or up to 1 percent of income, whichever is greater, and rise to $695, or 2.5 percent of income, by 2016.
For families the penalty would be $2,085 or 2.5 percent of household income, whichever is greater. The requirement to have coverage can be waived for several reasons, including financial hardship or religious beliefs.
Obamacare is one big giveaway to the corporate insurance companies. By the time this completely takes effect, people will be wishing Obama was a socialist, instead of the fascist he is turning out to be!
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by undo
just out of curiosity i would like to ask a couple questions
i have 3 kids, all of them are adults. 2 can't find jobs. the other is self-employed.
will they all have to pay for health insurance out of their own pockets, even if unemployed or self-employed?
No, but they will have to pay a fine that is less than the premium. What they will do is pay the fine and then have the taxpayer pick up their insurance bills for them.
.
Originally posted by undo
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by undo
just out of curiosity i would like to ask a couple questions
i have 3 kids, all of them are adults. 2 can't find jobs. the other is self-employed.
will they all have to pay for health insurance out of their own pockets, even if unemployed or self-employed?
No, but they will have to pay a fine that is less than the premium. What they will do is pay the fine and then have the taxpayer pick up their insurance bills for them.
.
how does a person without a job pay a fine? are they crazy?
Originally posted by butcherguy
Originally posted by undo
Originally posted by NavyDoc
Originally posted by undo
just out of curiosity i would like to ask a couple questions
i have 3 kids, all of them are adults. 2 can't find jobs. the other is self-employed.
will they all have to pay for health insurance out of their own pockets, even if unemployed or self-employed?
No, but they will have to pay a fine that is less than the premium. What they will do is pay the fine and then have the taxpayer pick up their insurance bills for them.
.
how does a person without a job pay a fine? are they crazy?
Crazy like foxes, they are!
A fool and his money are soon parted. We are the fools.
Your 401k is next in their sights. They will run out of paycheck to steal.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by undo
I'm guessing that they will not want to put you up with free room and board, so probably no jail.
I'm sure they would rather garnish paychecks. If we have one at that point.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by undo
If they can't balance the healthcare books, and they can't suck enough money from us, they will cut services and benefits I guess?
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by undo
You're right, it doesn't.
I can't imagine that the American people will stand for the poor being put in jail for nonpayment of their healthcare fines.
There were work programs in the 1800s also. The employers provided basic health care, basic housing, they even fed you though the food wasn't all that great. There were some downsides like corporal punishment for misbehaving slaves; um I mean employees. We have similar programs in many prisons now too.
Originally posted by butcherguy
reply to post by undo
There were work programs back the.
That would be an option for them, I suppose.
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Is it fear mongering when the increases are actually already occurring? Google it for yourself. People all over the country are complaining about huge spikes in insurance costs leading to many small companies and individuals losing what coverage they used to have. As the above poster mentioned, this was planned. The goal is single payer government controlled healthcare. Just look at the UK to see how that works out. Rationed health care will be the result in the end. AKA "death panels".
Originally posted by nixie_nox
reply to post by DarthMuerte
Are you really so naive that you can't recongize when insurance companies are fear mongering?
With the onset of healthcare, this behavior is more than predictable for these companies.
And you instantly took the bait, hook, line, and sinker.
"the George W. Bush tax cuts for the wealthy and corporations should be off the table, Americans’ retirement security and health care most definitely should [not] be.”
The Institute for Policy Studies claims that the Fix the Debt initiative is driven by business and is actually using the fear of going over the fiscal cliff “as a cover for tax-code changes that would damage our economy.” The institute found that Fix the Debt “has raised $60 million and recruited more than 80 CEOs of America’s most powerful corporations to lobby for a debt deal that would reduce corporate taxes and shift costs onto the poor and elderly.”