It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by HIWATT
Moral call? YES i'm making a moral call.
So you're implying China will mete out justice on the US with their new Nuclear arsenal and obliterate it and that's ok with you because the US dropped the Bomb on two Japanese [China's enemy] cities during WW-II?
Your comment regarding the age of that attack is irrelevant
Why?
SHAME ON YOU
Question still stands though...edit on 12-12-2012 by SLAYER69 because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by SLAYER69
.
How is this any different than the Soviet Union's capability of obliterating the US during the cold war which would have triggered MAD?
Originally posted by randomname
the article makes it sound like america and china are best friends.
america is like an infant still suckling on its mother's teat.
it's civilization is measured in millenniums, meanwhile america is self-destructing in just a couple of hundred years.
they're not just going to throw it away to start a nuclear war with americans unless it's very survival is threatened.
they won't even use it if n.korea invades s. korea and 10 million chinese die fighting in the process.
what it does do is allow them to stand up to the worlds bullies at the bargaining table and economically.
Originally posted by SLAYER69
reply to post by randomname
POP Quiz....
In the past 236 years that the US has been around how many times have the Chinese changed Governments...?
Originally posted by HIWATT
One nation has used them extensively since WWII. And that nation is the United States. Not just in Japan, but also the depleted uranium which has contaminated every country the US has "invaded" since.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by HIWATT
One nation has used them extensively since WWII. And that nation is the United States. Not just in Japan, but also the depleted uranium which has contaminated every country the US has "invaded" since.
Depleted uranium isn't a nuclear weapon though. Not condoning the use of the material, but that is what it is, a material. No nuclear explosion occurs when a depleted uranium round strikes another object.
Depleted uranium is 40% less radioactive than naturally occurring uranium; meaning it is nothing in terms of radioactivity.
Originally posted by GarrusVasNormandy
Originally posted by SLAYER69
.
How is this any different than the Soviet Union's capability of obliterating the US during the cold war which would have triggered MAD?
Personally, it's not different.
Two superpowers facing each-other. Which can be good because a Cold War doesn't involve direct conflict, but it's also bad because it can mean new proxy wars, and we all know how those past wars turned out and their consequences...
The recent economic studies have stated China will pass all world economies by 2030.
Makes me wonder where this is heading...
Originally posted by HIWATT
Bingo.
In that respect, it is much like what MAD was during the cold war.
As I stated however, things are a bit more complicated with he advent of various defensive technologies against these kinds of weapons.
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by HIWATT
One nation has used them extensively since WWII. And that nation is the United States. Not just in Japan, but also the depleted uranium which has contaminated every country the US has "invaded" since.
Depleted uranium isn't a nuclear weapon though. Not condoning the use of the material, but that is what it is, a material. No nuclear explosion occurs when a depleted uranium round strikes another object.
Depleted uranium is 40% less radioactive than naturally occurring uranium; meaning it is nothing in terms of radioactivity.
Depleted uranium is not classified as a dangerous substance radiologically, though it is a potential hazard in large quantities, beyond what could conceivably be breathed. Its emissions are very low, since the half-life of U-238 is the same as the age of the Earth (4.5 billion years). There are no reputable reports of cancer or other negative health effects from radiation exposure to ingested or inhaled natural or depleted uranium, despite much study.
DU is clearly dangerous for military targets, but for anyone else – even in a war zone – there is little hazard. Ingestion or inhalation of uranium oxide dust resulting from the impact of DU munitions on their targets is the main possible exposure route.
2030 ? O_o
If they aren't already there (or close) now, I don't see how it could possibly take another 20 YEARS to accomplish it.
(Reuters) - China's economy is likely to surpass the United States in less than two decades but the Asian country is not expected to take on the superpower role of the United States in gathering coalitions to deal with global issues, U.S. intelligence analysts said on Monday.
By 2030 Asia will overtake North America and Europe combined in global power based on gross domestic product, population, military spending and technological investment, a new intelligence report said.
Makes you wonder about the changing socio-political paradigm in America... and whether the emerging structure here is molding itself based on what is happening over there due to it's success.
"China isn't going to replace the U.S. on a global level," Mathew Burrows, counselor to the National Intelligence Council, said at a media briefing. "Being the largest economic power is important ... (but) it isn't necessarily the largest economic power that always is going to be the superpower."
Originally posted by HIWATT
LIES
One thing to say to that:
Go POUND SAND.
RADIOACTIVE sand....
Originally posted by SLAYER69
Originally posted by HIWATT
Bingo.
In that respect, it is much like what MAD was during the cold war.
So basically nothings changed. Well for those out there who are too young to remember the last Cold war maybe things have. But from many others perspective it's back to the same old business as usual.
As I stated however, things are a bit more complicated with he advent of various defensive technologies against these kinds of weapons.
ABMs and other technologies have been in the works for decades and have been tested and some even believe they have already been fielded.
Here's an interesting discussion on that scenario
Star Wars: It has begun
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by HIWATT
LIES
One thing to say to that:
Go POUND SAND.
RADIOACTIVE sand....
Lies? So science and research of the material is lies because you say so? Okay. I see where this thread is headed. Have fun in your head.
Originally posted by HIWATT
Uranium is radioactive.
"depleted" or not
Originally posted by ownbestenemy
Originally posted by HIWATT
One nation has used them extensively since WWII. And that nation is the United States. Not just in Japan, but also the depleted uranium which has contaminated every country the US has "invaded" since.
Depleted uranium isn't a nuclear weapon though. Not condoning the use of the material, but that is what it is, a material. No nuclear explosion occurs when a depleted uranium round strikes another object.
Depleted uranium is 40% less radioactive than naturally occurring uranium; meaning it is nothing in terms of radioactivity.
The scenarios for the highest potential exposure to DU in the Gulf War (friendly fire incidents, Level I) had estimated doses in the range of 0.05 Sv (5 rem). Incidental or casual exposures (Levels II and III) are estimated to be orders of magnitude less. To the extent that NATO forces in the Balkans had any exposure to DU, it is difficult to imagine exposure greater than Level II exposure scenarios.
You could say that nothing has changed, but the game board has gotten much more crowded... which I'm saying does change the game in that strategies and mindsets are influenced.
For instance, the US cannot simply say "we're going to bomb the Japs back into the stone age!!" now, without reaping a whirlwind.
Almost every nation during WWII had no response to a nuclear attack.
Definitely not the case today.