It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by gibbajabba
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by elevenaugust
Conclusion: In the icon depicting "Mary at the tomb of Jesus" there is no UFO. The round object upon the tomb is the dome of the original Holy Sepulcher building in Jerusalem.
Yes but was the "Holy Sepulcher" a former copy of a UFO.
I love the subject of ufo's but it's statements like the two that you've made here that make people that are not into this subject think that we are all wacko crazy people
Originally posted by HomerinNC
reply to post by Char-Lee
now thats just TRYING to stretch things, its a temple, NO UFO HERE
Mary Magdalene and the other Mary went to look at the tomb. There was a violent earthquake, for an angel of the Lord came down from heaven and, going to the tomb, rolled back the stone and sat on it. His appearance was like lightning, and his clothes were white as snow. The guards were so afraid of him that they shook and became like dead men". (Matthew 28, 1:4) The angel is like God’s seal of truth, his words are the Lord’s notarial deed: "Do not be afraid, for I know that you are looking for Jesus, who was crucified. He is not here; he has risen just as He said. Come and see the place where he lay". (Matthew 28, 1:7)
Originally posted by elevenaugust
Here's what I've found about this... roughly translated from Italian:
This small sacred image, dated between the sixth and tenth centuries and is part of a composition of various scenes from the life of Christ, is the arrival of the "pious women" at the tomb of Christ.
The number and names of the women vary in different gospels: Mary Magdalene and the other Mary Matthew, Mary Magdalene, Joanna, and Mary of James Luke, Mary Magdalene, Mary of James, and Salome, according to Mark, the only Magdalene seconds John. In this painting, however, those who approach the tomb is Mary the mother of Jesus (you can see the stars on the mantle), which makes us think of an apocryphal origin of the story. An apocryphal gospel in which Mary to go to the tomb of Jesus is that of Gamaliel, the sixth century.
In all the stories, however, women find the empty tomb, guarded by an angel who tells them not to despair because Jesus is risen.
Although this appears in many sites UFO "Saucer at the tomb of Jesus," reads a web page (www.bibleufo.com...), and "Notice the dome shaped object above the tomb. if it is a building why is it hovering? Also, what is the round object on top? "reads another (www.marsearthconnection.com...).
Instead, it is one of the very few pieces of the original appearance of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem ("Monks in arms, Sacred architecture of the Templars through the Mediterranean", 1995, p. 69-71). The holy place before the destruction wrought by the Sultan Hachim in 1009 and subsequent reconstructions, was composed of a newsstand supported by six columns, which was inside a building surmounted by a dome. Below the dome of the Holy Sepulchre in particular by printing the beginning of the XVI century and a photo of the 1958 Elia Kahvedjian:
Conclusion:
In the icon depicting "Mary at the tomb of Jesus" there is no UFO. The round object upon the tomb is the dome of the original Holy Sepulcher building in Jerusalem.
Sourceedit on 10-12-2012 by elevenaugust because: (no reason given)edit on 10-12-2012 by elevenaugust because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by gibbajabba
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by elevenaugust
Conclusion: In the icon depicting "Mary at the tomb of Jesus" there is no UFO. The round object upon the tomb is the dome of the original Holy Sepulcher building in Jerusalem.
Yes but was the "Holy Sepulcher" a former copy of a UFO.
I love the subject of ufo's but it's statements like the two that you've made here that make people that are not into this subject think that we are all wacko crazy people
Wow really, you think art could not be imitating ancient knowledge. So strange how Christians can except a temple but not even think what may the "Pillar of Fire and column of Smoke" may have been.
I find your statement odd and narrow minded, hard to believe you have a genuine interest in the history of UFO's.
Originally posted by Char-Lee
I like all the temples in the old pictures hanging out in the sky.
Originally posted by Maroboduus
This is a tapestry titled La Vie De La Vierge. Of key importance is the fact that it hangs in a church in Beaune, France. Also of key importance is that it was commissioned by Cardinal Jean Rolin.
The city in the background is Beaune, which was Jean Rolin's diocese at the time he commissioned this tapestry (he later moved to another diocese).
It was a common artistic practice at that time to signify ownership of a city or castle by portraying a possession associated with the owner in the sky directly above that city or castle, in close proximity to it.
Hmmm, i wonder what symbol was associated with Cardinal Jean Rolin, the guy who commissioned the painting and oversaw that particular diocese depicted in the background?
If only there was another painting of him which would let us know....
Hey look! There's a hat floating above him!
So, it was common to symbolize ownership by portraying something associated with the owner in the sky above the area in question, and Rolin was apparently associated with his ecclesiastical hat.
Let's look at the original painting again:
Three diocese, as symbolized by the three different flags which depict the heraldry of whoever "rules/owns" that diocese.
Floating above each diocese/heraldry.... a floating ecclesiastical hat, signifying the ownership of that diocese by the family represented in the heraldry beside it:
Originally posted by gibbajabba
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by gibbajabba
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by elevenaugust
Conclusion: In the icon depicting "Mary at the tomb of Jesus" there is no UFO. The round object upon the tomb is the dome of the original Holy Sepulcher building in Jerusalem.
Yes but was the "Holy Sepulcher" a former copy of a UFO.
I love the subject of ufo's but it's statements like the two that you've made here that make people that are not into this subject think that we are all wacko crazy people
Wow really, you think art could not be imitating ancient knowledge. So strange how Christians can except a temple but not even think what may the "Pillar of Fire and column of Smoke" may have been.
I find your statement odd and narrow minded, hard to believe you have a genuine interest in the history of UFO's.
Hmmm do i waste my time with you on this one? I don't think so as common sense doesn't seem to be one of your strong points
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by gibbajabba
Originally posted by Char-Lee
Originally posted by gibbajabba
Originally posted by Char-Lee
reply to post by elevenaugust
Conclusion: In the icon depicting "Mary at the tomb of Jesus" there is no UFO. The round object upon the tomb is the dome of the original Holy Sepulcher building in Jerusalem.
Yes but was the "Holy Sepulcher" a former copy of a UFO.
I love the subject of ufo's but it's statements like the two that you've made here that make people that are not into this subject think that we are all wacko crazy people
Wow really, you think art could not be imitating ancient knowledge. So strange how Christians can except a temple but not even think what may the "Pillar of Fire and column of Smoke" may have been.
I find your statement odd and narrow minded, hard to believe you have a genuine interest in the history of UFO's.
Hmmm do i waste my time with you on this one? I don't think so as common sense doesn't seem to be one of your strong points
Yes you waste your time and I will not offer personal insults because i disagree with your stance.
Originally posted by deadeyedick
reply to post by PurpleVortex
That's classic.
You know they'll be hatin.