It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by snapperski
Addressing a Washington audience that included Israel's Defence Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Mrs Clinton said the vote
"should give all of us pause. All sides need to consider carefully the path ahead".
The Game is up Israel simmer down or pay the piper.
Originally posted by Deetermined
In the meanwhile, Iran wants everyone to recognize them for the "victory" in Gaza!
Larijani: Shiite Clerics in Iraq See Tehran behind Tel Aviv's Failure in Gaza
TEHRAN (FNA)- Iranian Parliament Speaker Ali Larijani said that all the Shiite clerics residing in Iraq are aware of Tehran's key role in regional developments, especially in Gaza, and added that they consider Iran as the main cause of Gazans' victory over the Zionist regime during recent 8-day war.
english.farsnews.com...
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Originally posted by snapperski
Addressing a Washington audience that included Israel's Defence Minister Ehud Barak and Foreign Minister Avigdor Lieberman, Mrs Clinton said the vote
"should give all of us pause. All sides need to consider carefully the path ahead".
The Game is up Israel simmer down or pay the piper.
How long does the terrorist group Hamas and death to jews supporters here on ATS wish to live in denial, ignore reality?
Hillary Clinton, like everyone other human on Earth, only wants BOTH sides to consider the paths they had engage in. USA's comment is in no way taking sides, unlike others. Wake up.
Originally posted by TheHammer22
Originally posted by micmerci
reply to post by infowarrior9970
If you want to get technical, there is no such thing as a Palestinian. The so called Palestinian is just a combination of other ancestors from different regions of the ME. If you do not agree, then answer this- what is the Palestinian language? Currency?
When the Roman Empire conquered the land that is now referred to as Palestine it was renamed by the Romans as is typical of the Romans to the Latin name of Israels biggest enemy- Philistina. Philistines were the biggest enemy of Israel. Palestine is merely an English transliteration of Philistine and the original inhabitants were Jews.
Thats like saying Argentina isnt a country because they dont have their own language.
Israel has more English speakers, and people of European decent, than they have native Hebrews.
The modern Palistinian has more genetic similarity to the ancient Israelites, than the modern Jew has. By quite a bit actually.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by reeferman
Is dual citizenship a crime?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Had Israel evicted palestinians or had they been foolished to evacuate themselves freely after being led to believed in their arabs brothers that they could drive all jews into the sea and annihilate them back in 1948 and 1967, and numerous other arab terrorist slayings of innocent jews in declared peacetime?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Had USA slaughtered palestianians?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Had Israel slaughtered innocent palestinians except those who engage in war or use innocent palestinians as shields?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Are the continued targeting of innocent jewish cities with missiles by Hamas for years a myth?
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
Do end your BS and wake up to reality. You and your kind continued denial of truths and reality ARE part of the problem why there is no peace between Israel and Palestine. End your fantasies please.
Had Israel evicted palestinians...
Since the inception of Zionism, its leaders have been keen on creating a "Jewish State" based on a "Jewish majority" by mass immigration of Jews to Palestine, primarily European Jews fleeing from anti-Semitic Tsarist Russia and Nazi Germany. When a "Jewish majority" was impossible to achieve, based on Jewish immigration and natural growth, Zionist leaders (such as Ben Gurion, Moshe Sharett, Ze'ev Jabotinsky, and Chaim Weizmann) concluded that "population transfer" was the only solution to what they referred to as the "Arab Problem." Year after year, the plan to ethnically cleanse Palestine of its indigenous people became known as the "transfer solution".
•In a joint meeting between the Jewish Agency Executive and Zionist Action Committee on June 12th, 1938 Israeli first Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion stated:
"With compulsory transfer we [would] have a vast area [for settlement] .... I support compulsory transfer. I don't see anything immoral in it."
source
In "1948 and After" Benny Morris examines the first phase of the exodus and produces a detailed analysis of a source that he considers basically reliable: a report prepared by the intelligence services of the Israeli army, dated 30 June 1948 and entitled "The emigration of Palestinian Arabs in the period 1/12/1947-1/6/1948". This document sets at 391,000 the number of Palestinians who had already left the territory that was by then in the hands of Israel, and evaluates the various factors that had prompted their decisions to leave.
"At least 55% of the total of the exodus was caused by our (Haganah/IDF) operations." To this figure, the report's compilers add the operations of the Irgun and Lehi, which "directly (caused) some 15%... of the emigration". A further 2% was attributed to explicit expulsion orders issued by Israeli troops, and 1% to their psychological warfare. This leads to a figure of 73% for departures caused directly by the Israelis. In addition, the report attributes 22% of the departures to "fears" and "a crisis of confidence" affecting the Palestinian population. As for Arab calls for flight, these were reckoned to be significant in only 5% of cases...
In short, as Morris puts it, this report "undermines the traditional official Israeli 'explanation' of a mass flight ordered or 'invited' by the Arab leadership". Neither, as he points out, "does [the report] uphold the traditional Arab explanation of the exodus - that the Jews, by premeditation and in a centralized fashion, had systematically waged a campaign aimed at the wholesale expulsion of the native Palestinian population." However, he says that "the circumstances of the second half of the exodus" - which he estimates as having involved between 300,000 and 400,000 people - "are a different story."
One example of this second phase was the expulsion of Arabs living in Lydda (present-day Lod) and Ramleh. On 12 July 1948, within the framework of Operation Dani, a skirmish with Jordanian armored forces served as a pretext for a violent backlash, with 250 killed, some of whom were unarmed prisoners. This was followed by a forced evacuation characterized by summary executions and looting and involving upwards of 70,000 Palestinian civilians - almost 10% of the total exodus of 1947- 49.
Similar scenarios were enacted, as Morris shows, in central Galilee, Upper Galilee and the northern Negev, as well as in the post-war expulsion of the Palestinians of Al Majdal (Ashkelon). Most of these operations (with the exception of the latter) were marked by atrocities - a fact which led Aharon Zisling, the minister of agriculture, to tell the Israeli cabinet on 17 November 1948: "I couldn't sleep all night. I felt that things that were going on were hurting my soul, the soul of my family and all of us here (...) Now Jews too have behaved like Nazis and my entire being has been shaken.
source
Had Israel slaughtered innocent palestinians...
Are the continued targetting of innocent jewish cities with missiles by Hamas for years a myth?
Do end your BS and wake up to reality.
Originally posted by SeekerofTruth101
reply to post by reeferman
Is dual citizenship a crime?
Is Mrs Hillary Clinton a judged and sentenced criminal?
Originally posted by dsmg012
reply to post by DarknStormy
-_- are you serious? of course it was provoked by Europe and the Jewish people, as much as it was provoked by Arabs...
and btw this "Zionist regime" is still the only true democracy (one that does not give Islamic groups power over human rights) in the middle east. so call it how you want to call it, it's still better than any regime you want to be established there.
Isalmophobia XD
yeah, as much as Europe needed some counselling for Naziophobia in WWII.