It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by randyvs
This thread is proof that if you want stars and flags just post any BS about aliens. Everyone has lost their freegin minds.edit on 26-11-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by randyvs
This thread is proof that if you want stars and flags just post any BS about aliens. Everyone has lost their freegin minds.edit on 26-11-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Unidentified_Objective
1. Literary disclaimer informing readers that this is in fact a work of fiction.
2. Contradictory pseudoscience that rings of someone with only a middle school grasp of physics/science.
3. No evidence and a note claiming any proof that may have existed about this earth shattering and historic interview has been destroyed...purposely.
I just don't see why some people ignore this and continue conversing about this as if it was true. It's fiction people. Just another sci-fi story. [/quote why you say this is fiction do you now the truth( do tell ) no wonder they say we are not ready to handle the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by Spacespider
reply to post by bluestreak53
If it helps the reader to see it all as pure fiction, the reader should do so.
There are no physical evidence that the information is true
But I have my reasons to believe in it, I will disclose that in a upcoming thread
1. Literary disclaimer informing readers that this is in fact a work of fiction.
2. Contradictory pseudoscience that rings of someone with only a middle school grasp of physics/science.
3. No evidence and a note claiming any proof that may have existed about this earth shattering and historic interview has been destroyed...purposely.
I just don't see why some people ignore this and continue conversing about this as if it was true. It's fiction people. Just another sci-fi story.
As far as the Editor of the book, "Alien Interview" is concerned, and for all practical
purposes, the content of the book is a work of fiction. The Editor makes no claim to
the factuality of the content, and in fact, cannot prove that the alleged author
actually ever existed.
Originally posted by galadofwarthethird
Actually dude if you read the link in the op, you would know the captured crashed alien on some page goes on to say the same exact fact. She says that she is a in fact not a biological being and she even says she is a doll, in fact its not even her real body, its just a created synthetic body that they use when there in space for long periods of time.
It would be the equivalent to a highly advanced synthetic robotic doll like space probe which is made on an assembly line somewhere or in a vat, only its not controlled from some mission control at NASA. Its controlled by mind power from a galaxy far far away, by some sort of beems not that different then the way you cellphones are used to send signals to probes in space so you can talk to others all over the world.
So basically when they die it would be the same and they would feel about the same when dieing as if you had your character die when you were playing a videogame. That is you can always get another life, or hit the restart button and they got plenty of bodies created for all kinds of functions which they hop in and out off like you would in a video game character, the gray ones are just basically scouts or deep space no gravity bodies primarily used for long periods of time in space travel or to help with maintenance on ships.
Almost everyone enjoys a good sci-fi
Originally posted by TauCetixeta
reply to post by BigfootNZ
Airl has a mission to find the Lost Battalion.
Incredibly, Matilda was a member of the Lost Battalion.
That's why she stayed and talked to her .
She also said "Be above yourself" and her spirit jumped out and above her body.
Suddenly her veil of forgetfulness was lifted and she remembered her spiritual past.
Mission complete! She found one!
Then the MPs stormed into the room and accomplished nothing.
Airl simply went home to Space Station 33 in the asteroid belt.
Originally posted by AfterInfinity
reply to post by Unidentified_Objective
1. Literary disclaimer informing readers that this is in fact a work of fiction.
2. Contradictory pseudoscience that rings of someone with only a middle school grasp of physics/science.
3. No evidence and a note claiming any proof that may have existed about this earth shattering and historic interview has been destroyed...purposely.
I just don't see why some people ignore this and continue conversing about this as if it was true. It's fiction people. Just another sci-fi story.
Oh yeah? Doesn't look like the average disclaimer...
As far as the Editor of the book, "Alien Interview" is concerned, and for all practical
purposes, the content of the book is a work of fiction. The Editor makes no claim to
the factuality of the content, and in fact, cannot prove that the alleged author
actually ever existed.
From looking at the relevant selection, I'd have to say that you're more concerned with proving this material to be fictional than actually figuring out if there's a chance it is NOT fictional.
The editor took pains to make it clear that if anyone decided to call the publishers on their apparent lack of sanity for even considering to put this book on shelves, they themselves could point to that page and say, "But I didn't say I believed it! At best, I'm distributing "found journal" literature for the amusement of the public!"
"For all practical purposes" essentially means that anyone interested in looking into the matters discussed in the book shouldn't bother because they won't find anything. It's a tongue-in-cheek word of advice obscurely warning the reader that all materials therein were, at one point, confidential, and therefore, they are unlikely to get any more details than are contained within those pages.
I'm not saying you're wrong, I'm just saying that it's pretty silly to assume that's the only way these disclaimers can be read. I guess you're not a person of subtle language.