Ex- Congressman talks about 9/11/01 Attack! Must Read!

I still have not seen the OP state where one can effectively triple major with all of the requirements fufilled before entering college. I am not saying it cannot be done, but it is highly not plausible.

Also, selling a TV for two years (Yes, I saw the OP's assertion of the whole theater package) Wouldn't there be a new theatre like TV that would be available within this year span-thus making this deal ridiculous, let alone the amount of HDMI cable needed in this. (The popcorn machine was a nice touch)

And there is the whole coincidence of a brick being tossed into the window of his "private quarters" (pardon if I miss said this) If it was a private study and he was worried about people listening to him-wouldn't he pick somewhere without a window?

And I know the OP has said he hasn't stated secrets.

That word aside, he did have a congressman give out state secrets (because if we all believe this is an inside job-then these are state secrets by default) to a random dude who sold him a theater package.

My opinion-there's not a lick of truth to the story.

I would like to believe, but there's no credibility.

Hello. I so want to believe this story but it reads like a 70's porno movie. Ex congressman / horny woman goes to the tv store. Young salesman sells them the tv. Ex congressman / woman are so impressed they invite the salesman out to dinner. Salesman gets invited back to congressman's /woman's home to discuss 9/11 / have sex.
A brick gets thrown through the window / husband comes home mid sex. Etc etc etc

I probably watched too much of that stuff as a spotty youth but it just does not ring true. But, what do I know ?

Originally posted by iclark97
reply to post by fourthmeal

 

From what I remember they were more or less giant vaults almost either to be incenerated or to be kept alive as experiements. He wasnt to familiar with that, but he said that they were for sure not on the planes when they hit, that the two that hit the WTC were remotely controlled.

There are phone calls to loved ones moments before impact. I would suspect that if the plane were empty and loved ones were making their final calls to say goodbye, they would probably mention the fact that they were kidnapped and being taken to a hidden chamber to be incinerated in Canada. Just throwing that out.

There WERE phone calls made by the people on the planes before impact. Loved ones did speak to each other.

I'm curious as to how the inside job angle handles this detail.

reply to post by elitelogic


Voice altering machines.
Plus, I remember some of these call being very strange. Like someone calling their father and using their full name instead of "dad"

reply to post by DrGod


to be honest - i would expect an imposter using an aledged " voice altering machine "- would be using a carefully written script

however i would also expect the real person - who has realised their death is ineviable , and minuites away to say some strange things

reply to post by ignorant_ape


Good points.
But the truth is we will Never know.
So, here we are...

Originally posted by elitelogic

There WERE phone calls made by the people on the planes before impact. Loved ones did speak to each other.

I'm curious as to how the inside job angle handles this detail.

The "Vicsim" supporters become incredibly nasty and accuse one of being a government agent deserving a horrible death for asking questions like that.

Just my limited experience.

reply to post by DelMarvel


Surely all of the experts hear have not heard of something called compartmentalization, When I hear people say that passengers could not be hauled off to Canada to meet their fate, without some low guy on the totem pole speaking out. It never occurred to them that there might be soldiers or officials hand picked that would carry out a mission like that? People whom would want to be apart of something that big. People whom are just that evil. People who have can be paid enough to keep their mouths shut. People who are afraid to speak out, or that have no idea what they are doing and who the people are they are doing it to. This story is very believable to me. Like some have said, I have seen crazier sh!t happen in my life time. That does not mean I believe the story. I matters zero to me if the story is real or not. I think it means nothing to anyone truth or not. There has been more credible witnesses to speak out the truth about 9/11 that never really made a difference. Skeptics are the only thing I don't believe in. Most of them are to afraid of the truth, they can't handle it. The poor little brains can not fathom something it cant understand or deal with. They are the tools conspirators use to convince the rest of the world that the truths are that of fiction. I like skeptics, they are fun to toy with, weak closed minded tools. I say this will love, they do make for an entertaining waist of time. They could however be put in their place when it comes to the manors in which they bring to the table. but until we can reach through these monitors and smack someone, they will continue to be a cyber bully. I respect the educated skeptics, nothing like a good argument. A little constructive criticism goes a long way when you have an OPEN mind. Good read O.P.

reply to post by DrGod


OH just wait... in 50 years or so it will be declassified, and on the history channel. They will look back at us and wonder how some of us were so blind and thy the others didn't stand up and do something about it.

reply to post by I1Am1Ready1Are1You


Yes it would be compartmentalized, but you would have so many compartments for the different aspects of the mission, that the odds of talking go up.

reply to post by I1Am1Ready1Are1You

Surely all of the experts hear have not heard of something called compartmentalization,

yes we have

now explain why the ex - congress critter know how the passengers were allegedly disposed of

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by I1Am1Ready1Are1You

 

Surely all of the experts hear have not heard of something called compartmentalization,

yes we have

now explain why the ex - congress critter know how the passengers were allegedly disposed of

None of it makes any sense at all.

If some Evil Dark Forces wanted a reason to start a war, they wouldn't have done anything like the 9/11 attacks. Too strange, unusual and difficult.

Instead, they would have put a truck bomb in a large building (something easy and completely expected), puffed up some overseas scuffle, and blamed everything on Saddam's henchmen. On 9/10/2001, nobody in the Cheney/Bush Admin gave a frack about Afghanistan---it was all Iraq all the time. That's the whole point---the ex-Clinton admin people were getting uppity and worried about Afghanistan but nobody cared any more.

The conspiracy is open and in front of you: transmogrification of war in Afghanistan to war in Iraq. Everybody knows it, so nobody believes that's it, but that's exactly what happened. And it worked: Bush and Cheney were re-elected.

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by I1Am1Ready1Are1You

 

Surely all of the experts hear have not heard of something called compartmentalization,

yes we have

now explain why the ex - congress critter know how the passengers were allegedly disposed of

I'm sorry, I was attacking anyone. And the creditability of what the '' Ex-critter" (lol) says and knows means d!ck to me, I'm just explaining IMHO how I think such a plan of such magnitude can be carried out. Its not the first time I have heard of the passangers taken off the plan from a more credible source then Washingtons explanation.

Originally posted by mbkennel

Originally posted by ignorant_ape
reply to post by I1Am1Ready1Are1You

 

Surely all of the experts hear have not heard of something called compartmentalization,

yes we have

now explain why the ex - congress critter know how the passengers were allegedly disposed of

None of it makes any sense at all.

If some Evil Dark Forces wanted a reason to start a war, they wouldn't have done anything like the 9/11 attacks. Too strange, unusual and difficult.

Instead, they would have put a truck bomb in a large building (something easy and completely expected), puffed up some overseas scuffle, and blamed everything on Saddam's henchmen. On 9/10/2001, nobody in the Cheney/Bush Admin gave a frack about Afghanistan---it was all Iraq all the time. That's the whole point---the ex-Clinton admin people were getting uppity and worried about Afghanistan but nobody cared any more.

The conspiracy is open and in front of you: transmogrification of war in Afghanistan to war in Iraq. Everybody knows it, so nobody believes that's it, but that's exactly what happened. And it worked: Bush and Cheney were re-elected.

edit on 6-12-2012 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-12-2012 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)

edit on 6-12-2012 by mbkennel because: (no reason given)

I see your point, but it seems that one would assume that "they" would have only one agenda involving 9/11 based apon some of your ideas. Secondly the more simplistic the action, I.E. car bomb, The less one may be able to accomplish from a single action. Not saying that it cannot have multiple outcomes from a single action, but more so, as an example, if you wanted to test the gullibility of the public, test your boundaries, test your auto pilot on a large remote drone 747, and start a war with a false flag, present a reason to validate killing a target overseas, and more examples of that nature. then you can put all the "test" together into one scenario and in return make it harder to figure out the intent of such actions. IMHO