It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by EasyPleaseMe
reply to post by BlueNose
What annoys me is the now common practice of saying "would of" instead of "would have" etc.
Originally posted by xenthuin
reply to post by BlueNose
I purposefully use "I could care less" when that is precisely what I mean.
When I say that, what I actually mean is: "if you think that I am callous about (subject), then you should know that it is possible for me to care even less than my present level of caring."
Sometimes, something is so completely useless to me that I could NOT care less about it because I am presently unable to remove any more care for (subject) than I already have.
Originally posted by Trustfund
Grammar is a social construct.
Originally posted by SpearMint
"I could care less" is almost as annoying as the incorrect use of "their", "they're", "there", "your" and "you're".
Originally posted by Lazarus Short
Grammar, water bag icer gut! Ah nervous sausage bag ice!!
[If you can say where that came from, the duck comes down, and you get $100 (not really).]
Grammar is not as important as thought. Grammar is there to help transmit thought, but most of us are smart and we can still see what someone means if the grammar is slightly off. If there's a mispelling, you can still figure things out. Usually, there's context...
..people who nitpick grammar don't want to go deeper. They don't want think deeply about what a person is saying and either criticize or agree with the thought. They just want a simple reason to be able to write the person off.
Originally posted by RedmoonMWC
..people who nitpick grammar don't want to go deeper. They don't want think deeply about what a person is saying and either criticize or agree with the thought. They just want a simple reason to be able to write the person off.