It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Hydroman
Except none of them are inspired by god who gives them the words to say. Now, if god gave them the words to say, it should all be coherent. Go and put them together then write one complete story using all four of them.
Originally posted by MarkJS
They all coincide.... and are told from different perspectives. Just like, for example, when people see a house on fire... Some focus on one aspect, the other on a different. But the second person's perspectives, although they may be different, does not nullify the validity of the first.
I should also say that none of the authors of the gospels (except for maybe John..debatable) were witnesses to the resurrection.
Not worried about him walking this earth, he very well may have. Was he god? That's the issue.
Originally posted by MarkJS
If you're still interested in a proof that a Jesus actually existed and walked around this earth...
I should also say that none of the authors of the gospels (except for maybe John..debatable) were witnesses to the resurrection..
Originally posted by Hydroman
That's exactly right, and that's why it can't count as proof.
How do you know what they experienced wasn't true? Well maybe not everyone's, there's a lot of liars out there... but No-one's?
Originally posted by MarkJSI was raised in a full gospel church, which is pretty much the same as Assembly of God. But now that you've said that, do you mean to say that I can't experience him in a baptist or methodist church? What about Pentecostal?
Then maybe this reply is God's way of revealing Himself to you. Go to a church (association/network) called the Assembly of God... in your area. There, you will experience Him.
You fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm not looking for same wording.
Originally posted by MarkJS
I looked at the site. I don't know... it looks like the author of this site was looking for exact word matches.... Why would that be important? Like mentioned, the gospels are the same thing, but from different perspectives. It's just the human thing to do. I mean, if all four gospels were exactly the same in wording, we could then shed three of them without any trouble, right?
Originally posted by MarkJS
But why did He get the whole calendar system to revolve around Him? That doesn't pique your curiosity and interest?
The Anno Domini dating system was devised in 525 by Dionysius Exiguus to enumerate the years in his Easter table. His system was to replace the Diocletian era that had been used in an old Easter table because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.[16] The last year of the old table, Diocletian 247, was immediately followed by the first year of his table, AD 532. When he devised his table, Julian calendar years were identified by naming the consuls who held office that year—he himself stated that the "present year" was "the consulship of Probus Junior", which was 525 years "since the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ".[17] Thus Dionysius implied that Jesus' Incarnation occurred 525 years earlier, without stating the specific year during which his birth or conception occurred.
Here's why Jews say Jesus is NOT the messiah.
Originally posted by MarkJS
The way that it works- in what you may call proof- from a biblical perspective... is that in the Old Testament days... there were hints and clues of "A coming messiah". This messiah had to be from the tribe of Joseph, he had to be called a Nazarene, he had to be born of a virgin, he had to be Egyptian (called out of Egypt)...and a host of other requirements. These were accumulated in the span of several thousand years. Jesus came by and fulfilled All Of Them. This is the biblical proof that shows Jesus to be who he is... God. Because only God can do this.
Hold on a second....did I stop you from believing something? Did I make other people quit their beliefs? My kids sometimes go to church with my parents. I don't stop them. You are so wrong.
Originally posted by MarkJS
You can believe what you want... which is what you are not allowing others the freedom to do... but just because You don't see/accept it as proof... that doesn't automatically invalidate Their experiences or beliefs.
I've been to the Assembly of God, many times. It's the same as I was raised.
Originally posted by MarkJS
not so much... Try the Assembly of God .... you will see a difference.
Originally posted by Hydroman
You fail to understand what I'm saying. I'm not looking for same wording.
Originally posted by MarkJS
I looked at the site. I don't know... it looks like the author of this site was looking for exact word matches.... Why would that be important? Like mentioned, the gospels are the same thing, but from different perspectives. It's just the human thing to do. I mean, if all four gospels were exactly the same in wording, we could then shed three of them without any trouble, right?
First, you said that they wrote what god told them to write...did you not?
That being the case, the accounts are different. Many things do NOT match. For example, who was at the tomb when, how many angels, etc. Read them all side by side and you will see. There is one instance where Mary Magdalene runs off and tells the others about what happened, and another account where she says nothing to anyone. Which is it? There are several things like this.
Ok, so from what I gather from you is that these stories were written by man, and god DID NOT give them the words to write. They just wrote their own experiences. That being said, is the whole bible like that, or just the gospels? Is the whole bible written by man and their experiences, without god sitting at their side telling them what to write? Now, go and read the four accounts, because I'm sure you haven't sat down and done it yet. Then tell me that god told them to write contradictory information.
Originally posted by MarkJS
... That can be explained by the different perspectives. At first the women said nothing from being numb after the experience of seeing their Master's body being taken (their words).. and seeing angels... Well, I guessed they got a little shook up. I would be too. They said nothing... Then later, blurted out what happened. Makes sense to me.
Don't let these little apparent contradictions keep you from God. There's a lot at stake here. My recommendation is not to let what seems like huge problems from your eternal salvation. You need to go and work it out. Go to an Assembly of God, like I mentioned... then U2U me later, if you would like.
Here's why:
The Anno Domini dating system was devised in 525 by Dionysius Exiguus to enumerate the years in his Easter table. His system was to replace the Diocletian era that had been used in an old Easter table because he did not wish to continue the memory of a tyrant who persecuted Christians.[16] The last year of the old table, Diocletian 247, was immediately followed by the first year of his table, AD 532. When he devised his table, Julian calendar years were identified by naming the consuls who held office that year—he himself stated that the "present year" was "the consulship of Probus Junior", which was 525 years "since the incarnation of our Lord Jesus Christ".[17] Thus Dionysius implied that Jesus' Incarnation occurred 525 years earlier, without stating the specific year during which his birth or conception occurred.
Originally posted by Hydroman
Ok, so from what I gather from you is that these stories were written by man, and god DID NOT give them the words to write. They just wrote their own experiences. That being said, is the whole bible like that, or just the gospels? Is the whole bible written by man and their experiences, without god sitting at their side telling them what to write? Now, go and read the four accounts, because I'm sure you haven't sat down and done it yet. Then tell me that god told them to write contradictory information.
Originally posted by MarkJS
... That can be explained by the different perspectives. At first the women said nothing from being numb after the experience of seeing their Master's body being taken (their words).. and seeing angels... Well, I guessed they got a little shook up. I would be too. They said nothing... Then later, blurted out what happened. Makes sense to me.
Don't let these little apparent contradictions keep you from God. There's a lot at stake here. My recommendation is not to let what seems like huge problems from your eternal salvation. You need to go and work it out. Go to an Assembly of God, like I mentioned... then U2U me later, if you would like.
When you finally say that god didn't tell them what to write, then you see that it was all written by man's own hand. The whole bible was. And we know that man is fallible. So were those who translated. And so are those who preach it today. Why should we trust any of it?
Why not? Shouldn't I get what I deserve?
Originally posted by MarkJS
.. You may be in this class (God I hope not)... Hebrews 6:4-6
Now that we've established that the bible was written by man, by their own experiences, it can no longer be called god's word. It is man's word. Man is fallible. I want to hear from the source, not secondhand from fallible people who may or may not have had some kind of divine experiences.
Originally posted by MarkJS
True, they wrote from their own experiences. But like I said.. the second person's perspective does not invalidate the perspective of the first.
1 John 4:10
New Life Version (NLV)
10 This is love! It is not that we loved God but that He loved us. For God sent His Son to pay for our sins with His own blood.
1 John 4:10
Originally posted by Hydroman
Now that we've established that the bible was written by man, by their own experiences, it can no longer be called god's word. It is man's word. Man is fallible. I want to hear from the source, not secondhand from fallible people who may or may not have had some kind of divine experiences.
Originally posted by MarkJS
True, they wrote from their own experiences. But like I said.. the second person's perspective does not invalidate the perspective of the first.
See, I'm not stopping you from believing, as you accused me of earlier...
Originally posted by MarkJS
It looks like you're keeping to what you believe.... and I am keeping to my beliefs.
Reveal himself to me through a book? That doesn't make any sense.
Originally posted by MarkJS
Read the bible... Pray before you read it... like the prayer I suggested.... "God talk to me"... or "God, reveal yourself to me through this book"... something like that.
Would you say that you are open minded, or is your mind closed? You seem hypocritical imo. My mind is open, or I would not ask out into the air if there is a god out there to reveal himself to me, or to speak to me, or anything...
Originally posted by MarkJS
People talk like they are so open-minded, but with respects to God... the most important Person they will ever have to deal with... they are so closed-minded. It's just a big round circle(??)
Originally posted by MarkJS
We all deserve it, my friend... That's what makes God so special.
1 John 4:10
New Life Version (NLV)
10 This is love! It is not that we loved God but that He loved us. For God sent His Son to pay for our sins with His own blood.
1 John 4:10
Is it moral to allow an innocent person to take your place of punishment, if you are the one who committed the crime? Shouldn't you do your time and get what you deserve? Don't I deserve to be tortured forever in fire...
Originally posted by MarkJS
People talk like they are so open-minded, but with respects to God... the most important Person they will ever have to deal with... they are so closed-minded. It's just a big round circle(??)
Would you say that you are open minded, or is your mind closed? You seem hypocritical imo. My mind is open, or I would not ask out into the air if there is a god out there to reveal himself to me, or to speak to me, or anything...
Do you love any of the gods that you don't believe exist? I just believe in one less than you.
Originally posted by MarkJS
But I understand... you don't love - Love. You don't love... God... That's your right and priviledge. We all have free wills. Do what you want. If it feels good, do it.. and all that jazz.
Guess I better start believing because I'm afraid...?
Originally posted by MarkJS
But just be aware of what comes after....and don't act all surprised when it happens.edit on 18/11/2012 by MarkJS because: (no reason given)