It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by DarkKnight76
So, the extermination of the Native Americans and enslavement of Africans were a ok in god's eyes?
You better hope it's not the christian god.
Originally posted by Beavers
In fact, I hope there's a God just so he can wipe that smug look off adamant, know-it-all, athiests faces
God had no problem popping up anywhere and everywhere like a demented jack-in-a-box in the past/OT.
So Abraham didn't have a relationship with god? Moses? Any of the other prophets and judges that heard directly from him? Or the Israelites who saw his mighty works many times?
Originally posted by randyvs
Really ! How do you know this ? We haven't had a relationship with the Heavenly Father since Adam proved us all cowards by pointing his finger at his own wife, proclaiming she was the one what did it. She caused me toi eat the fruit there of that you.....told ...... me....not to..... eat.
and I'm not trying to be rude here, but was that your proof?
To me, what you're saying is that you don't know any other way how those things could be here, therefore a god must have done it. That's called an argument from ignorance. I'm not saying you are ignorant, but that is actually what the argument is called.
Originally posted by Minnie1985
i know i still haven't answered your question, but the whole world, every living creature, good and bad is my proof,
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
God had no problem popping up anywhere and everywhere like a demented jack-in-a-box in the past/OT.
Really ! How do you know this ? We haven't had a relationship with the Heavenly Father since Adam proved us all cowards by pointing his finger at his own wife, proclaiming she was the one what did it. She caused me to eat the fruit there of that you.....told ...... me....not to..... eat.edit on 17-11-2012 by randyvs because: (no reason given)
I THINK you mean that we have not been able to have a "face to face" relationship with God since Adam sinned. God cannot abide the presence of sin. Adam was sinless prior to his fall. He could stand face to face with the creator. Since then, no one else could. His holiness would blast the sinful out of existence. Thanks to the sacrifice of Jesus, we will be able to come before the Lord when all is done.
Originally posted by randyvs
reply to post by MonkeyFishFrog
God had no problem popping up anywhere and everywhere like a demented jack-in-a-box in the past/OT.
Really ! How do you know this ? We haven't had a relationship with the Heavenly Father since Adam proved us all cowards by pointing his finger at his own wife, proclaiming she was the one what did it. She caused me toi eat the fruit there of that you.....told ...... me....not to..... eat.
And if that is the case, why do you believe the bible if none of these people actually had some kind of relationship with this god
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by hawkiye
Then you fail to understand why Sodom and Gomorrah were judged. It wasn't just the existence of the sodomites there was the tolerance by the greater population of their lifestyle. That was when they roused the Lord's ire. That is where we are now imo. Though some of us do not accept or tolerate their lifestyle, the multitude now seem to.
Read the book of Job. Tell me how Satan, the father of sin, is able to have a face to face conversation with god, if god cannot abide sin....?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
God cannot abide the presence of sin. Adam was sinless prior to his fall. He could stand face to face with the creator. Since then, no one else could. His holiness would blast the sinful out of existence. Thanks to the sacrifice of Jesus, we will be able to come before the Lord when all is done.
Tell me about this relationship. What do you mean by that?
Originally posted by randyvs
Notice I said we as in mankind. Collectively ! Individually there can of course be a relationship. That doesn't mean
God himself has to be present here on earth at anytime.
Not face to face, no. Remember that Moses wanted to see the Lord and the Lord said he could not. He sheltered Moses in the cleft of a rock and covered him so that he would not be destroyed. Yet Moses still shined just from indirect exposure to the glory of God.
Originally posted by Hydroman
So Abraham didn't have a relationship with god? Moses? Any of the other prophets and judges that heard directly from him? Or the Israelites who saw his mighty works many times?
They did have a relationship with God. They heard from him, but they did not see him. They saw "The Angel of the Lord" which many believe was Jesus, they saw other Angels. They heard him speak and had dreams and visions. They did not see the face of GOD.
Originally posted by HydromanAnd if that is the case, why do you believe the bible if none of these people actually had some kind of relationship with this god?
Originally posted by Hydroman
Read the book of Job. Tell me how Satan, the father of sin, is able to have a face to face conversation with god, if god cannot abide sin....?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
God cannot abide the presence of sin. Adam was sinless prior to his fall. He could stand face to face with the creator. Since then, no one else could. His holiness would blast the sinful out of existence. Thanks to the sacrifice of Jesus, we will be able to come before the Lord when all is done.
Then that is some form of relationship. Explain to me why god couldn't show his face to Moses. Was god not capable of toning down his glory so that Moses could look at him? Isn't he all-powerful? Or was he just too lazy to do it?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Not face to face, no. Remember that Moses wanted to see the Lord and the Lord said he could not. He sheltered Moses in the cleft of a rock and covered him so that he would not be destroyed. Yet Moses still shined just from indirect exposure to the glory of God.
Cool, now why don't we have that today?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
They did have a relationship with God. They heard from him, but they did not see him. They saw "The Angel of the Lord" which many believe was Jesus, they saw other Angels. They heard him speak and had dreams and visions. They did not see the face of GOD.
The point is that he was full of sin, standing in the presence of god, which you said isn't possible. P.S. When we are dead and no longer in the flesh, why can't we be in god's presence, even though we are sinners, but no longer human?
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
Satan/Lucifer was the covering angel. It was his purpose to protect others from the holiness of God. Satan was later removed/will be removed from heaven. Until then, he is still an angelic being, not a human.
You need to reread my post. The majority of the population offended the Lord by tolerating their aberrant lifestyle. The same thing is happening here in the USA now. God may be waiting for that "tipping point" where there are no longer enough righteous people left here to justify sparing us the judgement this country has rightly earned. Or, we may have already passed that point. I am not sure, thus my question and this thread.
Originally posted by hawkiye
Originally posted by DarthMuerte
reply to post by hawkiye
Then you fail to understand why Sodom and Gomorrah were judged. It wasn't just the existence of the sodomites there was the tolerance by the greater population of their lifestyle. That was when they roused the Lord's ire. That is where we are now imo. Though some of us do not accept or tolerate their lifestyle, the multitude now seem to.
I think you need to re-read the story. God promised if there were any righteous left he would not destroy them nowhere does it mention that the population was tolerating it so they all deserved to be destroyed this is more dogma. IOW they were all given over to the so called sin. Just a bit different then 10% being sinful out of billions...
And again Christ teaches not to judge others leave it up to god so this contradicts that we are responsible for the so called sins of others now doesn't it.
edit on 17-11-2012 by hawkiye because: (no reason given)