It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by Neopan100
reply to post by diesel_actual
I wonder why the houses to the right are charred and the ones to the left aren't...any ideas?
most likely faulty appliance (thermo couple)...
Originally posted by delusion
To the possibility or not of gas explosion - it really could have been a 1 in a million situation, with perfect conditions for such an extreme explosion. It doesn't neccessarily matter that nothing previously has looked like this, there's still a first time for everything. Unless someone can work out an actual upper-limit to what is possible using physics that rules it out completely based on the effects?
It is of course noticable and worth pointing out the seeming equal destruction of both properties, and that the epicentre seems to be between the properties, but it's possible that a stronger wall on one side of the house deflected the explosion to it's neighbour, shielding the other house (I *think* there was a small wall or structure left standing in one of the obliterated houses)
It's also possible that the way they both look to have been completely obliterated is just a result of a very complete fire in the second house.
If it was in any way an 'official' assassination, it would have been explained naturally by now, a covert assassination is supposed to be explainable by other causes. The likelihood of a foreign power firing a missile undetected into an American suburb is virtually impossible. So military srtrike is very much reaching into illogical territory. The circumstances and implications to make it possible are just too much, unless you're trying to make life much more sinister and exciting than it is.
If it was an air-burst meteor, there would have been a very obvious flare just before, and a sound, but none have been reported in that area. Still possible of course.
I really don't get why the time of 11.10 is supposed to be 'suspicious'. It had to occur at some time, everything does. Why is this in any way indicative of pre-meditation?
Some of the reasoning that goes on here hurts my brain, but it gets me thinking at least. (mostly just 'ohmygod what the hell is wrong with you').edit on 12-11-2012 by delusion because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by StareDad
reply to post by diana
The reporter said it happened around 11:15 p.m or so, regardless, it was dark night. Who paints furniture outside at night in fall? I don´t swallow that. Suspiciously, at least 10 people mentioned they know the neighbours or such. Come on, ATS is big and the earth is small sometimes but not that small. I may believe 3 or 4 in a special coincidence but not as many as posted. I followed the thread until page >40. I´m not saying you are lying but many clearly do.
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by delusion
The US is very arrogant, when it comes to thinking we are the best and all that. The US navy would have said it was impossible for a russian sub to sneak into the middle of a war exercise, until they actually did it. Just something to ponder, if it was a country making a statement, proving it could be done, you think we would ever find out? I think it would be kept under wraps, classified super top secret
Not that I believe it was some kind of military strike, just putting on my devil's advocate hat
Originally posted by PieceOfThePuzzle
If I could star this multiple times, I would. It seems that people think the world is more evil than it actually is.
Originally posted by delusion
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by delusion
The US is very arrogant, when it comes to thinking we are the best and all that. The US navy would have said it was impossible for a russian sub to sneak into the middle of a war exercise, until they actually did it. Just something to ponder, if it was a country making a statement, proving it could be done, you think we would ever find out? I think it would be kept under wraps, classified super top secret
Not that I believe it was some kind of military strike, just putting on my devil's advocate hat
granted, quite possibly.
But everything's planned for, so wouldn't there be a policy, written somewhere, about what statements are to be made in event of an attack? Would they just make a up a plan on the spot? They certainlly would be very cautious about saying anything until they were 100 percent sure, because it would amount to a decleration of war. Be interesting to know under what conditions they would keep it a secret, if any. A shame if they would.
Originally posted by PieceOfThePuzzle
If I could star this multiple times, I would. It seems that people think the world is more evil than it actually is.
Ha, cheers. It *could* be that evil, but that *could be* should have some solid grounding first.
edit on 12-11-2012 by delusion because: (no reason given)
his post is definitely not the only stellar post in the thread, lots of valid opinions his included which have not been confirmed or denied yet.
Originally posted by PieceOfThePuzzle
Originally posted by delusion
Originally posted by TKDRL
reply to post by delusion
The US is very arrogant, when it comes to thinking we are the best and all that. The US navy would have said it was impossible for a russian sub to sneak into the middle of a war exercise, until they actually did it. Just something to ponder, if it was a country making a statement, proving it could be done, you think we would ever find out? I think it would be kept under wraps, classified super top secret
Not that I believe it was some kind of military strike, just putting on my devil's advocate hat
granted, quite possibly.
But everything's planned for, so wouldn't there be a policy, written somewhere, about what statements are to be made in event of an attack? Would they just make a up a plan on the spot? They certainlly would be very cautious about saying anything until they were 100 percent sure, because it would amount to a decleration of war. Be interesting to know under what conditions they would keep it a secret, if any. A shame if they would.
Originally posted by PieceOfThePuzzle
If I could star this multiple times, I would. It seems that people think the world is more evil than it actually is.
Ha, cheers. It *could* be that evil, but that *could be* should have some solid grounding first.
edit on 12-11-2012 by delusion because: (no reason given)
Other than people claiming that because 'X' happened that it must be, without a shadow of a doubt be 'Y' ?
Thanks again for the stellar post.edit on 12-11-2012 by PieceOfThePuzzle because: (no reason given)
Originally posted by Maskander
his post is definitely not the only stellar post in the thread, lots of valid opinions his included which have not been confirmed or denied yet.
Originally posted by lilmehere
Facebook pictures
Look at that car..