It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by blupblup
But as I keep saying, the comments made be a Councillor and a Former Police Chief, both saying Masons need to be investigated, certainly piqued my interest.
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
Out of curiousity, exactly how is it ascertained whether an applicant has a criminal record or not? For my current job, and when I did voluntary work with children, I had to complete and submit a CRB (Criminal Record Bureau) check. I am assuming that the Masons do not carry out such formalised checks...so how do they go about it?
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
In my jursidiction, and many in the United States, a criminal background check is a mandatory part of the membership process.
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
And who does that go through? Because I assume if it goes through the Police, they would then have, already, a record of all Freemasons that under these circumstances they could discretely check...
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
Can anyone clarify, that an individual would be barred from entering the fraternity if they had any kind of offence?
My concern is that if they are using 'contacts' within the Police force to find out whether someone has a record or not, not only is that in itself a legal contravention, it is also open to abuse in that it is based on the assumption that the officer concerned is not themselves in some way corrupted.
Originally posted by AugustusMasonicus
In my state this would be difficult and would have to entail a personal call or someother direct means of contact with the State Police on the form in question to identify the person as attemtping to join the Masons as they are generic (name, address and social security number only).
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
So, it therefore wouldn't necessarily include records of arrests that didn't result in convictions?
Again thanks. The system that you have is quite different to ours...it's a pity we don't have any UK Freemasons on here of late who could help clarify things for me. Certainly from what you say, it would be difficult to 'abuse' such a process...but I am wondering whether that is different over here. But, curiousity somewhat satisfied. Cheers.
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
No one has to reveal craft secrets after all, just declare their membership if they hold public office.
Out of curiousity, exactly how is it ascertained whether an applicant has a criminal record or not? For my current job, and when I did voluntary work with children, I had to complete and submit a CRB (Criminal Record Bureau) check. I am assuming that the Masons do not carry out such formalised checks...so how do they go about it?
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
And who does that go through? Because I assume if it goes through the Police, they would then have, already, a record of all Freemasons that under these circumstances they could discretely check...
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
If the Freemasons used this, under the Rehabilitation of Criminals Act they could be sued for discrimination if they refuse membership based on spent offences.
Can anyone clarify, that an individual would be barred from entering the fraternity if they had any kind of offence?
Originally posted by KSigMason
reply to post by lifttheveil
Take a chill pill, I was just proposing a hypothesis. "Thou doth protest too much, methinks"
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
No one has to reveal craft secrets after all, just declare their membership if they hold public office.
Why should I be compelled to do such a thing if it is against my will?
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
My concern is that if they are using 'contacts' within the Police force to find out whether someone has a record or not, not only is that in itself a legal contravention, it is also open to abuse in that it is based on the assumption that the officer concerned is not themselves in some way corrupted.
Originally posted by lifttheveil
Because Masons are known to be high up in government and other positions
and they have been implicated in many sick and illegal acts
MP's should have to say if they are a Mason, especially when you swear oaths to masonry that are a conflict of interest.
Originally posted by KSigMason
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
No one has to reveal craft secrets after all, just declare their membership if they hold public office.
Why should I be compelled to do such a thing if it is against my will?
Originally posted by KilgoreTrout
If we look at it hypothetically, if there was a chance that some members of your fraternity were using said fraternity as a cover for paedophilia, or as a means to network with other paedophiles, would you not be compelled to open up the doors and allow investigators in to root out such activity?
I think so. Given the nature of these allegations, I don't think it is unreasonable, for the Freemasons to be expected to want to assist the authorities in anyway that they possibly can, and given that we are talking about crimes, systemised crimes, against children, I would expect them to be as cooperative as they can. Surely, being a Freemason is nothing to be ashamed of.
I think it is important to stress the very different nature of British and US society, and I do not think that it is even remotely useful to tar every one, or every Freemason, with the same brush.
So while you make the assertion that Freemasons do not populate the upper eschelons of government or society in the US, we cannot be entirely sure that the same culture applies to the UK.
It is not such a huge leap of faith that some of those people also took advantage of the open door of Freemasonry, and subsequently abused the rights and privileges of membership to that fraternity.
I am certain that the possibility exists that some Freemasons, particularly in the UK could be, given the culture of this country specifically. And that it is up to the body of Freemasonry as a whole, to help root out these criminals and predators.
Originally posted by network dude
I cannot wait for the...Alcohol part!
Surely, being a Freemason is nothing to be ashamed of.
As you may or may not be aware, in the UK, we have a tiered educational system.
Originally posted by OnTheLevel213
If, however, I cared as British Masons care not to be named as Masons, I have a civil right to keep it private, and an equal right to due process until far more than what has been so far presented as evidence comes to light before surrendering those rights.
Originally posted by OnTheLevel213
Thing is, this isn't the first time we've been down this road in the UK. Inquiries have been done and registries created. It just keeps leading to nothing.
Originally posted by OnTheLevel213
A just society, however, does not operate on "leaps of faith" in its prosecution, however minor (and I'm not sure I agree that's not a huge leap of faith). I'll again make room for the differences between the US and UK (the UK has recently been even weaker in protecting free expression than the US), but if you were to present the above as a probable cause affidavit in the United States, you'd be laughed out of the courtroom.
Originally posted by OnTheLevel213
Justice to all concerned cannot come from a process like this, and justice to all concerned, not merely to the more sympathetic party, is both the goal and the imperative of a free society.
Originally posted by KSigMason
If you want to know the affiliations of public servants, why limit it to just Freemasonry? Should nepotism and corruption be despised regardless of affiliation?