Everyone Who Voted for Obama is a Traitor to the US

Originally posted by Sissel

Originally posted by AuranVector


The masses (who voted for Obama) are clueless.

There's nothing you can do about it now, is there? For at least 4 more years.

Tell you what, why don't you invest in Kleenex along with Donald Trump, and create a few jobs.

Either that, or make it your mission to educate all the clueless masses between now and the next election.

You've understood nothing I've posted. This country is lost forever.

Originally posted by AuranVector
I just saw that Ohio goes to Obama, so the race is over.

Obama is a New World Order (NWO) shill who is here to destroy the US as a sovereign nation.

Obama has now been given another four years (at least) to finish the job of destroying the US economy.

Expect things to get very, very bad in the US. We haven't seen anything yet.

Romney would have slowed down our sprint towards the fiscal cliff. Now there is nothing to stop Obama & the agenda of the NWO Elites behind him.

I mourn the death of my country. It will not recover from another four years of Obama.

Most of the US voters are ignorant of what was really at stake in this election. This was the most important election of my lifetime: the fork in the road for the US. The Obama supporters are really clueless. It's hard not to despise them.

It's hard not to be angry with those fiscal Conservatives who know Obama is a disaster for the US and yet wasted their votes on someone who cannot possibly win -- when those votes could have gone to Romney to unseat Obama.

I am disgusted by the treason of anyone who voted for Obama, but most of all I grieve for the death of my country.

LOL How predictable, dropping the NWO in SECOND LINE...and SHILL too...read you like a book!!
Just because you're on ATS doesn't have to mean you have to be against every single in the world you know...you don't have to find conspiracy in everything. You know, things would've been as bad, if not worse actually with your Bush2 and the way the economy is going WORLDWIDE no one single person is going to be able to change that...with aaalll the # thats actually REALLY going down you'd love to add Iran to your list huh?

reply to post by AuranVector


I wish you had lived your grandparents life.. I wish you had gone through WW2 and Depression.. I wish you lived in 1970s Russia so you would have a clue as to what hard times and oppression really like.

I see so many right wingers sit around putting this bs out there, all while online and in the comfort of there living rooms while they snack and watch cable TV then pretend that they have it oh so bad.

reply to post by Cuervo


As of 1 a.m., Obama had 50,237,808 votes -- Romney, 50,113,942. Just so you have the numbers to back that up Also, just so everyone knows, I didn't vote for either... actually I just didn't vote. I am not informed enough as a voter and I know the president is but a face of the nation.

reply to post by BABYBULL24


elections.huffingtonpost.com...

According to that, Obama has won the popular vote as well ( so far )...

Obama: 54,947,142
Romney: 53,846,020

I didn't vote for either of them.

However, there was something about Romney I didn't like.

Wow, thats really what you think? I know presidents are puppets but my gut feeling tell´s me I´d rather have Obama puppet then Mitt Romney.

You've understood nothing I've posted. This country is lost forever.

reply to post by AuranVector


You're right, it's doomed, so you should get out now while you still can.
Need any help packing?

Originally posted by AuranVector


You've understood nothing I've posted. This country is lost forever.

To the contrary, I have understood everything you have said. You are disgusted by people you consider stupid and clueless, flat out demeaning your own countrymen, and women.

You have nothing positive to say about people who might live right next door to you, who may have voted for Obama.

I understand that you are a very bitter,and emotional person, who didn't get his way.

WHAHHHHHHHHH, WHAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH, WHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

reply to post by Resurected


Wow...that was well said!! Things could always be worse. Most of us are actually in a pretty good position nowadays, as you said in the comfort of our homes and in front of our computers. Things really could be way worse...

Everyone who votes is helping to continue this charade.

Originally posted by jude11
I am Canadian and I also mourn the death of America. That Country I grew up admiring is nothing but a memory.

The World is also mourning...at least those Nations that are standing for peace.

The people of the US have chosen 4 more years of oppression and War against the innocents. That tells more than anything that the US wants to continue their murderous attempt at World domination.

I believe they have just chosen to be the enemy of the World. If it was in doubt before, it's now very clear.

You had a last chance with Ron Paul and blew it.

Duck & Cover...you asked for it.

I hear you on this one. I am sure everyone who re-elected him will see how much they should have listened to their gut rather than some puppet speech of the Elite.

And as much as I know some people don't like this guy, however, Donald Trump has the potential to be right and that this was a sad day for the USA of A.

On a funny side-note, I always thought the "NWO" would be the BAD guys.
Romney is the bad guy for me. He was the worst presidential candidate you ever had. A religious, backwards thinking, intolerant, women/gay bashing multimillionaire who already admitted he doesn't give a # about America, who changed his words the minute he opened his mouth. I am ashamed the race was even that close.

reply to post by Screwed


Everyone that doesn't vote has willingly relinquished their right to have their voice heard in the construction of our government.

To summarize: Vote = a possibility to influence who our government consists of.
No vote = no chance at all.

So, which of those options allows the "charade" to continue again?

Originally posted by JiggyPotamus
You've got it backwards buddy. The super rich are the ones in control of this country, along with most of the world. Had Romney been elected, he would have stuck with the republican doctrine of shrinking government and regulations, which means these mega corporations and other large businesses are going to get away with more than they already do. This also will translate into less regulation on Wall Street.

Everyone complains about Obama, but he is not half as bad as Bush was. That is the reason things are only getting better at a snail's pace, as Bush screwed us over extremely badly. So you should not be blaming Obama. Think about it. The housing bubble is a HUGE part of the reason the US is in this position. And WHY did that occur? Because of NO REGULATIONS prohibiting these plunderers from plundering. THAT is what we got under bush, and it would have been the same had Romney won.

So you need to realize that your political ideals are simply wrong. And then there are those who want to complain about Obamacare. It is not perfect, by any means, but why is he the only person attempting to do something about the poor healthcare in the US, poor from an economic pov that is? Bush had EIGHT years, and he accomplished absolutely nothing except putting us in a financial situation we still have not recovered from. So all the republicans who want to complain about Obama wanting to help people, need to stop and think of how much of a hypocrite you are, considering you did not throw such a tantrum when Bush was in office succeeding in hurting our nation and its people.

And you don't think the super-rich control Obama? You bet they do.

Obamacare is not about healthcare. Obama does NOT care about our healthcare. Obamacare is about the massive expansion of Federal power.

Bush was not responsible for the financial collapse of 2008. Some powerful Dems were.

You think I was a Bush supporter? I voted for Kerry in 2004. I was a bit more naive back then.

You think I'm a Neo-Con? I'm pro-choice. I'm NOT Christian (I don't belong to any organized religion).

I am pro-USA and this country has been systematically destroyed for decades. Obama is on an ACCELERATED NWO agenda.

I am happy and relieved Obama won. Had he lost we`d be facing mass-riots, looting, violence and mayhem and the ever looming threat of entire cities being burnt to the ground. This way we have a peaceful atmosphere.

Originally posted by flexy123
On a funny side-note, I always thought the "NWO" would be the BAD guys.
Romney is the bad guy for me. He was the worst presidential candidate you ever had. A religious, backwards thinking, intolerant, women/gay bashing multimillionaire who already admitted he doesn't give a # about America, who changed his words the minute he opened his mouth. I am ashamed the race was even that close.

LOL Seeee....that is why I'm sitting here thinking Bush is mind controlling him!!

You just KNOW that if he were to get elected he'd one day give a speech saying "GOD told me there were WMD'S in Iran and HE wants me to invade them!!"

I did not vote for Obama. Nor did I vote for any elected official. I found none of them ethically palatable, personally.

But with that said, I have a question. It has become apparent to me that when people discuss the "NWO," there are actually two conceptualizations thereof, depending - evidently - upon where on the political spectrum one falls.

One is seen as using the U.N. and other supranational or international bodies and organizations to undermine national sovereignty, take away people's gun rights, weaken the U.S. military until it can no longer defend itself or project power abroad without the aid of its NWO masters, indenture the population through the perpetuation of a welfare state, bankrupt the country through the use of socialist and/or communist social programs while stealing the hard earned wealth of free citizens, and expand and centralize government power and oversight over the people. This form of the NWO is often associated with and attributed to the actions and policies of the political left by those who adhere to this belief (which are usually those on the right, in my experience.)

The other is seen as using the military industrial complex to expand the power of the U.S. and NATO allies' military capabilities and strategic influence, curtail civil liberties, create and use a massive domestic surveillance apparatus, move free societies gradually into (essentially) police states, expand the wealth and financial control over the global and national economies by the international banking cartels, cause or allow a large portion of the human population to perish via war, disease, and abject poverty, and gradually consolidate control by the financial and industrial elite over the people of the world through a modern form of quasi-feudalism. This form of the NWO is often associated with and attributed to those on the political right by those who adhere to this belief (who are usually those on the left, in my experience.)

Which of these NWOs are you suggesting Obama is a part of? And is it possible that if such machinations actually exist, they are really one and the same? Can we consider the possibility that this is a false dichotomy, intended to divide and conquer? Perhaps, for all I know, without even the candidates themselves' willing cooperation. Their advisers, policymakers, and writers after all, shape their dialogue and policies as much as they do. Case in point...

Romney's campaign advisers included policy architects of the war on terror, a co-author of the PATRIOT Act, the head of the NSA during warrantless wiretapping of American citizens in the wake of 9-11 and the aforementioned war on terror, George W Bush's second head of the DHS (the DHS itself being in my view a prime example of expanding and centralized government power, despite the GOP's "smaller government" platform,) and the former Vice Chairman of Blackwater. In my respectful opinion, this does not sound like someone very far removed from either conception of the supposed NWO.

Obama for his part likewise signed the NDAA. He allowed Guantanamo Bay to remain open, and did not outright ban any and all forms of torture under all circumstances. Under his watch, controversial domestic data mining and surveillance have also continued. Our use of unmanned aerial drone strikes in a variety of countries has expanded considerably, continuing the trend established by the Bush administration.

The alleged NWO or elite "PTB" ties to GWB and the Bush and family in general are often discussed and speculated about. Yet I know few people who believe GWB was actually capable or knowledgeable enough (not an insult, just an observation of people's attitudes) to implement his administration's far-reaching, precedent setting policies and doctrines on his own. He had, among others, arguably the most powerful and policy-driving vice president of all time.

My point being that regardless of what either man's real intentions and motives may be, their associations and actions do not seem particularly far removed from the supposed NWO agendas people put forth in my opinion. There are agendas that both parties, regardless of platform or administration, and despite evidently staunch differences on key issues, maintain and perpetuate unabated in my view. To me, saying that one candidate is more of an "NWO" subordinate than another in this case is like splitting hairs. Whatever their "better angels" might be driving them to try to accomplish alongside those agendas, and whether or not they pursue them themselves or are driven and "handled" toward them.

This is only one person's opinion/thought/speculation. Consider it as you will. Also note that I did not note a belief in the supposed NWO necessarily. Just speculating. Peace.

Originally posted by LuckyLucian
reply to post by Screwed

 

Everyone that doesn't vote has willingly relinquished their right to have their voice heard in the construction of our government.

To summarize: Vote = a possibility to influence who our government consists of.
No vote = no chance at all.

So, which of those options allows the "charade" to continue again?

I guess George was wrong.
Not a big fan I take it?

reply to post by AuranVector


If you truly believe that the NWO is in control and are all powerful - then how would any election have made a difference at all. With a defeatist mindset like that - there cannot be a win at all.

The elite surely exist and exert an undo influence. But we outnumber them by nearly 7 billion. If we get to a rubber hits the road moment - they will lose.

~Heff

Originally posted by Verse

Originally posted by flexy123
On a funny side-note, I always thought the "NWO" would be the BAD guys.
Romney is the bad guy for me. He was the worst presidential candidate you ever had. A religious, backwards thinking, intolerant, women/gay bashing multimillionaire who already admitted he doesn't give a # about America, who changed his words the minute he opened his mouth. I am ashamed the race was even that close.

LOL Seeee....that is why I'm sitting here thinking Bush is mind controlling him!!

How do you know Obama is not wearing a tin foil "scalp" under his black hair?