It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by SplitInfinity
Evolution no longer remains a THEORY. It is fact. The Human Genome Project was concluded and this mapping was compared and is still being compared the the massive amount of Genome Mapping of other organisms it was determined that ALL LIFE...Plant, Animal, Microscopic Organisms...etc...ALL had the same Viral Infection encoding within their DNA.
This is 100% PROOF that all Life originated and EVOLVED from a SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM. A VIRUS is NOT ALIVE. The Men who won the Nobel Prize for their work in Virology won in the Nobel category of CHEMISTRY as a Virus does have DNA but is not living.
END OF ISSUE! Split Infinity
Just because you know some facts that I don't care about, doesn't prove intervention to be wrong, especially when those facts have nothing to do with proving intervention wrong.
Which are the "non important things" to you -- your own words or the facts that contradict your interventionist hypothesis?
Yes, the Bible teaches that we live in a geocentric universe i.e. that the Earth is at the center, surrounded by the firmament. The Ptolemaic system, which is what you linked to, added the concept of a spherical Earth (in contradiction to the flat Earth claimed by the Bible) but preserved the concept that the Earth was the center of the universe.
That would be my mistake, because I assumed a universe should include other planets.
You need better reading comprehension skills. I never claimed or implied that the Bible mentioned other planets, just that it claimed a flat Earth, geocentric model of the universe.
Neither, what I'm claiming is that your claim of it being hellinistic over being geocentric led me to look at some information about geocentric, which offered a line up of the planets.
You're the one that claimed that the Bible included the "astronimacal line up of our planets”. Are you now claiming that the Bible does not include the “astronimacal line up of our planets”?
All the ones I have researched are.
But that’s not what you claimed. What you claimed was “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”.
I think your confusing the fact that your not able to locate them, with them not being in existence. Just because a location can't be located doesn't mean it's no longer there. As an example, when a bomb blew up hiroshima, it was still there in the aftermath. Now you probably wouldn't be able to identify it as hiroshima but the location is still there.
I have provided four examples of places mentioned in the Bible that are not “real places still today” and your lame excuse for why they have never been found is “I'm not familliar with them”. Either “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today
All I'm admitting is that your just not able to find them.
or they are not. Can you explain where these four locations are, keeping in mind that none of these were “bombed” in the Bible, or are you admitting that not “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”?
Repost the four, and I will probably have better luck in finding them.
You claimed that “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”. I presented four that have never been found. Do you know where they are? Remember, you made the positive claim. It's up to you to provide evidence that “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”. Are you now claiming that not “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”?
You might want to check that, I dont believe I used the word immediately.
But your claim wasn't just that there's a calendar in existence based on the supposed birth of Jesus Christ, but also that “people back in that time” started using BC/AD immediately after the supposed birth of Jesus Christ.
And out of all of these which is the one most commonly known and used?
Every calendar system in existence is based on something: the Jewish calendar, where we are in year 5773 and the new year falls in September, is based on the claimed date of the creation of the Earth; the Islamic calendar, where we are in year 1434 and the new year falls in November, is based on the Hijra from Mecca to Medina; the Chinese calendar, where we are in year 4709 and the new year falls in late January, is based on the reign of Emperor Huang-Di; the Indian calendar, where we are in year 5114 and the new year depends on which Indian state you happen to be in, is based on when Krishna returned to his eternal abode. All of these systems, and the dozens of others that exist, "still manage to keep track based on that event" -- whatever event they chose to start their calendar.
Ya and what makes it even more confusing is when others have collaborated on it.
From what you can tell, DNA has a "blue laminate".
Why? Because controlling people’s perception of the afterlife, regardless of whether it is real or not, is a powerful to
I have searched for areas to see if the afterlife is mentioned, and never found any. Can you give some locations.
Why? Because controlling people’s perception of the afterlife, regardless of whether it is real or not, is a powerful tool for controlling people themselves. Or are you claiming that the afterlife isn't explicitly mentioned in the Bible?
Prove to me that all Life originated and EVOLVED from a SINGLE CELLED ORGANISM.
Just because you know some facts that I don't care about, doesn't prove intervention to be wrong, especially when those facts have nothing to do with proving intervention wrong.
So what you have proven at this point by your claims, is that the bible was not written by good scientists. But like I keep trying to tell you, supernatural elements are not bound to the restrictions of science. Are you sure your understanding the differnce between the supernatural and science, as we seem to keep revisiting this?
Neither, what I'm claiming is that your claim of it being hellinistic over being geocentric led me to look at some information about geocentric, which offered a line up of the planets.
All the ones I have researched are.
All I'm admitting is that your just not able to find them.
You might want to check that, I dont believe I used the word immediately.
And out of all of these which is the one most commonly known and used?
Ya and what makes it even more confusing is when others have collaborated on it.
I have searched for areas to see if the afterlife is mentioned, and never found any. Can you give some locations.
There is a difference between the bible being scientifically accurate and historically accurate.
So the facts that I've presented that shed light on how the Bible isn't an accurate source of "documentation" has nothing to do with your interventionist hypothesis which relies heavily on you claiming the Bible is accurate source of "documentation" of events?
I think it can, you have brought many things to light that will remain in question but haven't proven anything to be wrong. Even if the bible makes claims that represent a geocentric view, you are making an assumption that we know better at this time. None of which is a fact or proven.
So then the Bible, by your own admission, cannot be used as objective "documentation" or evidence of any of the events that you claim it can be.
I would believe more that you either didn't research very well, or gave up easily with half hearted attempts. I found this site that basically tells you where each city is, and with pin point accuracy. If they had wanted to, it looks like they could have also of given Longituide and Latituide as well. I was only able to find a couple that it looks like they were unsure of, but then I didn't look at each and every one of them.
But that's still not what you claimed. You made the positive claim that “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”. I have provided four locations which aren't “real places still today”, if they ever even existed in the first place. Do you know the modern locations of these four places? If you do not, then how can you continue to claim that “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”?
If nine out of ten are found, I'm happy to say they are all real. If I miss place my keys it doesn't mean they aren't real. There are way to many citys known.
So then not “all of the citys mentioned in the bible are real places still today”.
You assumed that meant BC/ AD period and its just a general statement.
Then what were you referring to when you said "people back in that time"?
You can argue that basis all you want, but the fact of the matter is, we use the AD time line as a reference to keep track, and the majority of the planet still to this day abides by the ten commandments.
Which still has nothing to do with whether or not it was a real event. The Gregorian calendar isn't the first calendar that was in common usage, it will not be the last.
I never admitted that the blue laminate was falsly collaborated, you must be suffering from selective amnesia. Your welcome to call the Mission in Spokane WA and ask them if they ever held chappel about blue laminate. I was there.
You mean collaborated on that "blue laminate" that you were never able to provide any evidence of or reference to, which you then admitted that you were wrong about? How did others collaborate on a fictional concept that exists only in your own mind?
Not in its entirety, no.
Sheol is mentioned throughout the Old Testament, Gehenna is mentioned throughout the New Testament. If you haven't seen these references, then you must not have actually read the Bible.
I just watched some special on netflix, where this guy used to totally believe in evolution had switched to creationism because evolution has to many holes in it.
I am honestly perplexed at the fact that highly regarded scientists really believe in evolution in gerenal or even the big bang theory. I refuted evolution long ago, and after taking 2 anatomy & microbiology classes recently I believe even more so that we are created by one creator. Even I can see the writing on the wall as how we all came together, but to think it all happened by chance is so obsured to me. Its ridicuously impossible. I mean didnt we debunk the whole "spontaneous generation" centuries ago?
Originally posted by littleewok
I am honestly perplexed at the fact that highly regarded scientists really believe in evolution in gerenal or even the big bang theory. I refuted evolution long ago, and after taking 2 anatomy & microbiology classes recently I believe even more so that we are created by one creator. Even I can see the writing on the wall as how we all came together, but to think it all happened by chance is so obsured to me. Its ridicuously impossible. I mean didnt we debunk the whole "spontaneous generation" centuries ago?
A recurring theme in antievolution literature is that if science cannot account for the origin of life, evolution is false, and that "spontaneous generation" was disproven, so therefore evolution is false. This syllogism fails, because evolution (that is, common descent and transmutation of species) occurs whether or not life arose by chance, law or design, but there is another more insidious mistake here. It is not true that "spontaneous generation" has been ruled out in all cases by science; the claims disproven were more restricted than that. Hence this essay. We will look at the history of the idea, and then the disproofs, and finally the relation of the origin of life to evolutionary theory in general. As always, we start with the Greeks. Once we reach Pasteur, the implications of the debate to that point for evolution will be considered. Then we will look at the modern - post-Pasteur and post-Darwin - developments in Origins of Life research.
Originally posted by littleewok
I am honestly perplexed at the fact that highly regarded scientists really believe in evolution in gerenal or even the big bang theory. I refuted evolution long ago, and after taking 2 anatomy & microbiology classes recently I believe even more so that we are created by one creator. Even I can see the writing on the wall as how we all came together, but to think it all happened by chance is so obsured to me. Its ridicuously impossible. I mean didnt we debunk the whole "spontaneous generation" centuries ago?
"Even I can see the writing on the wall as how we all came together, but to think it all happened by chance is so obsured to me. Its ridicuously impossible."
Originally posted by littleewok
reply to post by flyingfish
Okay, never said it was spontaneous, but then again where did the apes come from in this evolution theory? Formed by themself, out of thin air? Just curious.
Originally posted by littleewok
reply to post by flyingfish
Okay, never said it was spontaneous, but then again where did the apes come from in this evolution theory? Formed by themself, out of thin air? Just curious.
Originally posted by littleewok
reply to post by HappyBunny
Woah, calm down there, don't get your briefs in a bunch now.
First off, Spontaneous Generation was in the 1st chapter of my COLLEGE Microbiology book this semester.
And yes they still talk about it.(they call this learning, if you didn't know) Of course I'm not an expert, but you must be? um yeah, I didn't think so.
My point was this....I heard theories of evolution in the past and they just are not convincing whatsoever. Why? BECAUSE THERE'S NO PROOF!! It's a bunch of gibberish.
Too many missing links, even evolutionists with PH. D's can tell ya that.
By taking Microbiology, Anatomy & Physiology 101 and 102, (which I have A's in, thank you very much,
oh and yeah I don't cheat, but maybe you did in school, hmmm?)it gave me clearer vision of how evolution could never be and never was.The human body and all of it's inter workings could never be evolved into this masterpiece we call the human body.
There is definitely an intelligent mind behind it. There is absolutely no question in my mind. I just look at the proof, it's really simple to see it. You just have to lift the veil over your eyes.
Originally posted by littleewok
reply to post by HappyBunny
GIBBERISH! you are talking and saying nothing!!!! e coli? really? gimme a break. Is this what you do all day, cut people down? wow you crack me up.......I don't have time for you......I have finals.
Originally posted by littleewok
reply to post by HappyBunny
I do understand ur problem is u dont like the fact that i see nothing to it. So all u do is bash my intelligence and then blame it on education. ...very childish.
All that u have said still doesnt say anything about how we r standing upright now......if there is evolution where is it, fossils dont tell us that, i dont see half human half ape walking around....where in history can this be seen?
Mutations r what they r, it still doesnt prove anything....evolutionists have been on the hunt for proof for years...u still dont have any but yet u try so hard. Like a dog who chases his tail, he'll never get it. Enough said.