Are you satisfied about Obama's birth certificate and past?

Originally posted by muse7
Come on birthers its been 5 years and Obama is about to begin his 2nd term, and you all still have not produced a single shred of evidence that backs up your stupid claims

If he would fly me to Hawaii I will gladly look in the book and proclaim my findings

Only he can authorize a record search, even though we were told they "no longer do it that way" or some other crappy excuse

Yep. I am satisfied. Even if he was not born here he probably would not know it. He won the vote and was President. If he wins again he will be president again regardless of where he was born.

Originally posted by Xeven
Yep. I am satisfied. Even if he was not born here he probably would not know it. He won the vote and was President. If he wins again he will be president again regardless of where he was born.

Good attitude

care not for truth of where he was born, if he lied and cheated the system, if his name is actually correct

Flouride works as advertised

Well well well

A Canadian birther
Now I've seen it all

Originally posted by muse7
Well well well

A Canadian birther

Now I've seen it all

Would you call me a Christian if I told you I believed Jesus died on a cross?

reply to post by BrianG


Why satisfy one nutball...when a lot of others believe?

So you don't believe...guess you don't believe in aliens are flying UFOS, NWO or any other such nonsense since they also have no proof they exist.

Oh wait some guys who give heresay on some website about UFO's and NWO and such nonsense with out any credentials believes they exist so it must be true...but some guy on another website with 20 plus yrs credentials saying Obama's BC is legit on another website must be lying..

By the way I don't believe in aliens are flying UFO's are in the NWO are such nonsense...

reply to post by BrianG


BrianG, you asked a question in the OP: "Are you satisfied about Obama's birth certificate and past?"

People give you their honest opinion, the majority claiming to be satisfied, and you belittle and degrade them for it? Was this thread just an excuse to pick a fight?

Let me know when you contact Obama and ask him to meet you in Hawaii for a birth certificate peek-show.

Not really. 'Transparency' would seem to need a reworking, in every dictionary in the world. Let's just say that what I wrote in college was sufficient to get my degree withheld, on behalf of a Jesuit institution, though I stand by what I said, and still await my degree, honorary doctorate, and Nobel Peace prize.

The last time I attempted to reinstate my driver's license, I was told to apologize to the bitch who snatched up my only picture ID, and my long form BC was sneered at as being unacceptable. Instead, I told her to have a shxxty day, demanded that she also 'take off her glasses', and said I want to know what, exactly, it's like to have a depression-proof job. I dunno. I guess I should be glad a swat team response wasn't implemented. I remember saying in a loud voice that it would be easier to become POTUS than take a driver's test, before exiting the building. I walked the 4 miles back home in bare feet, rather than to ruin my moccasins, or listen to the twisted Jesus-speak (pastor george) in the terrible confines of someone's car, and develop nerve problems.

Technofascism isn't working so well for the people, and this would be true no matter who's POTUS, I know. But this obama fellow is hiding stuff. Who deprives charities of a 5 million dollar freebie, simply because we aren't supposed to know who he is, what he wrote, and how he arrived there?

Originally posted by sheepslayer247
reply to post by BrianG

 

BrianG, you asked a question in the OP: "Are you satisfied about Obama's birth certificate and past?"

People give you their honest opinion, the majority claiming to be satisfied, and you belittle and degrade them for it? Was this thread just an excuse to pick a fight?

Let me know when you contact Obama and ask him to meet you in Hawaii for a birth certificate peek-show.

can you show me proof of belittlement and degradement of a person by name?

to generally infer is a crime? you guys are proclaiming me a birther because I choose to question the "status quo"

Forget the fraudulent birth certificates.

To convince 'me' I would need to see records of the hospital bills and delivery charges. Those would still exist in microfisch on both the hospital side and the bank side.

Follow the money and you find the truth.

Originally posted by BrianG

Originally posted by Kaploink
I was always sure. Do you really think presidential candidates are not checked by government agencies to see if they meet the requirements to be president? The government which has access to all the records including birth certificates.

okay that is what I wanted to hear - somebody who is on a conspiracy web site but trusts their government and it systems of "checks and balances"

No I think the bigger point is if he is okay to the people that vetted him what can you do about it? If by some chance the President's records are faked then the call to presidency came from a very high power. So besides political reasons what other reason would a smart person have to bring the issue up? Does he/she expect TPTB
to say okay we got caught Obama can't be president anymore? People who are wasting their time on this issue should be concerned about the bigger picture.

reply to post by BrianG

can you show me proof of belittlement and degradement of a person by name?

Sure....

Flouride works as advertised

Maybe I misunderstood your intent. Please, tell me what you were "inferring".

to generally infer is a crime? you guys are proclaiming me a birther because I choose to question the "status quo"

You're a birther because you brought up the BC issue and will not accept any evidence that contradicts the birther way of thinking. You are not questioning the status quo...you're questioning the elegability of Obama through his BC.

That is a Birther. Don't like the label....don't talk about birth certificates.

According to islamic tradition, In A.D. 621, at the age of 51, Mohammed was awakened by the archangel Gabriel, who invited him to come outside.
As he stepped through the door, he was introduced to a huge white horse with giant wings like an eagle. Gabriel told him that the horse once belonged to Abraham, and that his name was El Barack (or Buraq) meaning, “White horse” and "Lightning".
Allah told Mohammed that in the end of days, when the “day of recompense” arrives, the flying white horse will return for the resurrected Mohammed to mount and ride again.
Barack Hussein Obama is an islamic jihadist disguised as a Christian.

The white horse represents the spirit of conquest in the disguise of Peace, both spiritually and phsyically.
In the context of modern day events.

You can attempt to call me a birther to marginalize me and put me in a place to redicule me for asking for truth

If you are not on the left you must be on the right - doesn't cut it with me

I guess you have no idea how Canadian politics works? We don't get "indoctrinated" to red or blue from birth

This entire subject has been hashed out to the level of minutia for the past four years and not a single person has been able to substantiate the claims made by Orly Taitz.

The sad part is that this just feeds the stream of misinformation and detracts from people focusing upon the real issues and problems with the current POTUS. For example, five days ago Barack Obama signed a very troubling new Executive Order - and yet nobody is talking about it - or any of the previous assaults upon our freedoms, preferring to expend their energies upon this red herring of a subject.

The "look over here! LOOK OVER HERE!' trick is a staple of magicians worldwide - a commonly known thing. And, yet, when we're asked to "look over here" we still fall for it each and every time,

~Heff

Originally posted by Hefficide

This entire subject has been hashed out to the level of minutia for the past four years and not a single person has been able to substantiate the claims made by Orly Taitz.

The sad part is that this just feeds the stream of misinformation and detracts from people focusing upon the real issues and problems with the current POTUS. For example, five days ago Barack Obama signed a very troubling new Executive Order - and yet nobody is talking about it - or any of the previous assaults upon our freedoms, preferring to expend their energies upon this red herring of a subject.

The "look over here! LOOK OVER HERE!' trick is a staple of magicians worldwide - a commonly known thing. And, yet, when we're asked to "look over here" we still fall for it each and every time,

~Heff

I just wanna satiate my quest for answers - my gut feeling about it all won't let me let go of it

Sorry but the POTUS is your problem and you guys have other fish to fry, just let an old Canadian poke around a bit more

Some day some body will have some evidence that will satisfy me and I can move on.

reply to post by BrianG


Perhaps I was a bit harsh and too quick to label. I have had an "interesting" day and I feel a bit rowdy. So I apologize.

That being said, you will most likely never find the evidence that satisfies your curiosity. What else can be done? He has given us the BC and such, what else is there?

Originally posted by kerazeesicko
Some don't believe due to race...others are just gullible and believe any freakin ol' conspiracy put out there.

How these people get through life is beyond me..being led around like a sheep.

perhaps your the one being led around..obama is a fraud..i was hopefull when he got elected but way to much has happened that tells me he is no beacon of light and part of the same corrupt system..i think romney is a scumbag as well..i agree with sheepslayer 242 in the context that we will likley not get any different info than what has been begrudgingly provided by obama

No, not satisfied on this issue at all! Still too many unanswered questions which need to be addressed. The only people that seem to be satisfied are the ones that seem to not want to ask the questions as to who Obama really is, because apparently they're afraid of the answers they might find.

The sham marriage of Ann Dunham and Barack Obama, Sr. would have probably taken place in February of 1961, just before or after the baby was born. This would also mean that Barack Obama, Sr. the man, "married in name only," who has no physical resemblance to our president, could not be the biological father; there just wasn't enough time. For Obama Sr. to work as the real biological father, an early August birth date is about as soon as a child could be born. This would explain the story of an unlikely meeting in a Russian class and the rapid seduction of Ann. It would also explain why Obama's birth certificate appears to many experts to be a forgery. Obviously, if Obama was born in February 1961, the birth certificate would have to be "modified."

Just When Was Obama Born?

Not at all satisfied.
Doesn't make any difference though does it?
Politics.